Poseidon: Mitigating Interest Flooding DDoS Attacks in Named Data Networking

Content-Centric Networking (CCN) is an emerging networking paradigm being considered as a possible replacement for the current IP-based host-centric Internet infrastructure. In CCN, named content becomes a first-class entity. CCN focuses on content distribution, which dominates current Internet traffic and is arguably not well served by IP. Named-Data Networking (NDN) is an example of CCN. NDN is also an active research project under the NSF Future Internet Architectures (FIA) program. FIA emphasizes security and privacy from the outset and by design. To be a viable Internet architecture, NDN must be resilient against current and emerging threats. This paper focuses on distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks; in particular we address interest flooding, an attack that exploits key architectural features of NDN. We show that an adversary with limited resources can implement such attack, having a significant impact on network performance. We then introduce Poseidon: a framework for detecting and mitigating interest flooding attacks. Finally, we report on results of extensive simulations assessing proposed countermeasure.Comment: The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2013

Interest Flooding Attack in Named Data Networking: A Survey

Named Data Networking (NDN) is based on the principle of Content-Centric Networking (CCN) that aims to overcome the weaknesses of the current host-based Internet architecture. Like traditional networks, it is identified that NDN is also vulnerable to many security threats including denial-of-service (DoS) or distributed DoS (DDoS) and might offer avenues for new DoS/DDoS attacks. DDoS attacks can be triggered in NDN to exhaust resources within an NDN router or the content producer(s). This survey paper focuses on different types of possible distributed denial-ofservice (DDoS) attacks; in particular, we address Interest flooding, where an adversary with limited resources can implement this attack and significantly impact thenetwork performance and their proposed countermeasures.Keywords:Named Data Networking, Interest flooding, denial-of-service

To NACK or not to NACK? Negative Acknowledgments in Information-Centric Networking

Information-Centric Networking (ICN) is an internetworking paradigm that offers an alternative to the current IP\nobreakdash-based Internet architecture. ICN's most distinguishing feature is its emphasis on information (content) instead of communication endpoints. One important open issue in ICN is whether negative acknowledgments (NACKs) at the network layer are useful for notifying downstream nodes about forwarding failures, or requests for incorrect or non-existent information. In benign settings, NACKs are beneficial for ICN architectures, such as CCNx and NDN, since they flush state in routers and notify consumers. In terms of security, NACKs seem useful as they can help mitigating so-called Interest Flooding attacks. However, as we show in this paper, network-layer NACKs also have some unpleasant security implications. We consider several types of NACKs and discuss their security design requirements and implications. We also demonstrate that providing secure NACKs triggers the threat of producer-bound flooding attacks. Although we discuss some potential countermeasures to these attacks, the main conclusion of this paper is that network-layer NACKs are best avoided, at least for security reasons.Comment: 10 pages, 7 figure