An evolutionary algorithm with double-level archives for multiobjective optimization

Existing multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) tackle a multiobjective problem either as a whole or as several decomposed single-objective sub-problems. Though the problem decomposition approach generally converges faster through optimizing all the sub-problems simultaneously, there are two issues not fully addressed, i.e., distribution of solutions often depends on a priori problem decomposition, and the lack of population diversity among sub-problems. In this paper, a MOEA with double-level archives is developed. The algorithm takes advantages of both the multiobjective-problemlevel and the sub-problem-level approaches by introducing two types of archives, i.e., the global archive and the sub-archive. In each generation, self-reproduction with the global archive and cross-reproduction between the global archive and sub-archives both breed new individuals. The global archive and sub-archives communicate through cross-reproduction, and are updated using the reproduced individuals. Such a framework thus retains fast convergence, and at the same time handles solution distribution along Pareto front (PF) with scalability. To test the performance of the proposed algorithm, experiments are conducted on both the widely used benchmarks and a set of truly disconnected problems. The results verify that, compared with state-of-the-art MOEAs, the proposed algorithm offers competitive advantages in distance to the PF, solution coverage, and search speed

Interactive Decomposition Multi-Objective Optimization via Progressively Learned Value Functions

Decomposition has become an increasingly popular technique for evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). A decomposition-based EMO algorithm is usually designed to approximate a whole Pareto-optimal front (PF). However, in practice, the decision maker (DM) might only be interested in her/his region of interest (ROI), i.e., a part of the PF. Solutions outside that might be useless or even noisy to the decision-making procedure. Furthermore, there is no guarantee to find the preferred solutions when tackling many-objective problems. This paper develops an interactive framework for the decomposition-based EMO algorithm to lead a DM to the preferred solutions of her/his choice. It consists of three modules, i.e., consultation, preference elicitation and optimization. Specifically, after every several generations, the DM is asked to score a few candidate solutions in a consultation session. Thereafter, an approximated value function, which models the DM's preference information, is progressively learned from the DM's behavior. In the preference elicitation session, the preference information learned in the consultation module is translated into the form that can be used in a decomposition-based EMO algorithm, i.e., a set of reference points that are biased toward to the ROI. The optimization module, which can be any decomposition-based EMO algorithm in principle, utilizes the biased reference points to direct its search process. Extensive experiments on benchmark problems with three to ten objectives fully demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method for finding the DM's preferred solutions.Comment: 25 pages, 18 figures, 3 table

Preference incorporation in MOEA/D using an outranking approach with imprecise model parameters

Multi-objective Optimization Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) face numerous challenges when they are used to solve Many-objective Optimization Problems (MaOPs). Decomposition-based strategies, such as MOEA/D, divide an MaOP into multiple single-optimization sub-problems, achieving better diversity and a better approximation of the Pareto front, and dealing with some of the challenges of MaOPs. However, these approaches still require one to solve a multi-criteria selection problem that will allow a Decision-Maker (DM) to choose the final solution. Incorporating preferences may provide results that are closer to the region of interest of a DM. Most of the proposals to integrate preferences in decomposition-based MOEAs prefer progressive articulation over the “a priori” incorporation of preferences. Progressive articulation methods can hardly work without comparable and transitive preferences, and they can significantly increase the cognitive effort required of a DM. On the other hand, the “a priori” strategies do not demand transitive judgements from the DM but require a direct parameter elicitation that usually is subject to imprecision. Outranking approaches have properties that allow them to suitably handle non-transitive preferences, veto conditions, and incomparability, which are typical characteristics of many real DMs. This paper explores how to incorporate DM preferences into MOEA/D using the “a priori” incorporation of preferences, based on interval outranking relations, to handle imprecision when preference parameters are elicited. Several experiments make it possible to analyze the proposal's performance on benchmark problems and to compare the results with the classic MOEA/D without preference incorporation and with a recent, state-of-the-art preference-based decomposition algorithm. In many instances, our results are closer to the Region of Interest, particularly when the number of objectives increases

An adaptation reference-point-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.It is well known that maintaining a good balance between convergence and diversity is crucial to the performance of multiobjective optimization algorithms (MOEAs). However, the Pareto front (PF) of multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) affects the performance of MOEAs, especially reference point-based ones. This paper proposes a reference-point-based adaptive method to study the PF of MOPs according to the candidate solutions of the population. In addition, the proportion and angle function presented selects elites during environmental selection. Compared with five state-of-the-art MOEAs, the proposed algorithm shows highly competitive effectiveness on MOPs with six complex characteristics

A Preference-guided Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition (MOEA/Ds) represent a class of widely employed problem solvers for multicriteria optimization problems. In this work we investigate the adaptation of these methods for incorporating preference information prior to the optimization, so that the search process can be biased towards a Pareto-optimal region that better satisfies the aspirations of a decision-making entity. The incorporation of the Preference-based Adaptive Region-of-interest (PAR) framework into the MOEA/D requires only the modification of the reference points used within the scalarization function, which in principle allows a straightforward use in more sophisticated versions of the base algorithm. Experimental results using the UF benchmark set suggest gains in diversity within the region of interest, without significant losses in convergence

Incorporation of region of interest in a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

Preference-based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) restrict the search to a given region of the Pareto front preferred by the Decision Maker (DM), called the Region of Interest (ROI). In this paper, a new preference-guided MOEA is proposed. In this method, we define the ROI as a preference cone in the objective space. The preferential direction and the aperture of the cone are parameters that the DM has to provide to define the ROI. Given the preference cone, we employ a weight vector generation method that is based on a steady-state evolutionary algorithm. The main idea of our method is to evolve a population of weight vectors towards the characteristics that are desirable for a set of weight vectors in a decomposition-based MOEA framework. The main advantage is that the DM can define the number of weight vectors and thus can control the population size. Once the ROI is defined and the set of weight vectors are generated within the preference cone, we start a decomposition-based MOEA using the provided set of weights in its initialization. Therefore, this enforces the algorithm to converge to the ROI. The results show the benefit and adequacy of the preference cone MOEA/D for preference-guided many-objective optimization.This work was supported by the Brazilian funding agencies CAPES and CNPq

Cultural Algorithm based on Decomposition to solve Optimization Problems

Decomposition is used to solve optimization problems by introducing many simple scalar optimization subproblems and optimizing them simultaneously. Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Problems (DMOP) have several objective functions and constraints that vary over time. As a consequence of such dynamic changes, the optimal solutions may vary over time, affecting the performance of convergence. In this thesis, we propose a new Cultural Algorithm (CA) based on decomposition (CA/D). The objective of the CA/D algorithm is to decompose DMOP into a number of subproblems that can be optimized using the information shared by neighboring problems. The proposed CA/D approach is evaluated using a number of CEC 2015 optimization benchmark functions. When compared to CA, Multi-population CA (MPCA), and MPCA incorporating game strategies (MPCA-GS), the results obtained showed that CA/D outperformed them in 7 out of the 15 benchmark functions

System Architecture Design Using Multi-Criteria Optimization

System architecture is defined as the description of a complex system in terms of its functional requirements, physical elements and their interrelationships. Designing a complex system architecture can be a difficult task involving multi-faceted trade-off decisions. The system architecture designs often have many project-specific goals involving mix of quantitative and qualitative criteria and a large design trade space. Several tools and methods have been developed to support the system architecture design process in the last few decades. However, many conventional problem solving techniques face difficulties in dealing with complex system design problems having many goals. In this research work, an interactive multi-criteria design optimization framework is proposed for solving many-objective system architecture design problems and generating a well distributed set of Pareto optimal solutions for these problems. System architecture design using multi-criteria optimization is demonstrated using a real-world application of an aero engine health management (EHM) system. A design process is presented for the optimal deployment of the EHM system functional operations over physical architecture subsystems. The EHM system architecture design problem is formulated as a multi-criteria optimization problem. The proposed methodology successfully generates a well distributed family of Pareto optimal architecture solutions for the EHM system, which provides valuable insights into the design trade-offs. Uncertainty analysis is implemented using an efficient polynomial chaos approach and robust architecture solutions are obtained for the EHM system architecture design. Performance assessment through evaluation of benchmark test metrics demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed methodology