92 research outputs found

    Computational structure‐based drug design: Predicting target flexibility

    Get PDF
    The role of molecular modeling in drug design has experienced a significant revamp in the last decade. The increase in computational resources and molecular models, along with software developments, is finally introducing a competitive advantage in early phases of drug discovery. Medium and small companies with strong focus on computational chemistry are being created, some of them having introduced important leads in drug design pipelines. An important source for this success is the extraordinary development of faster and more efficient techniques for describing flexibility in three‐dimensional structural molecular modeling. At different levels, from docking techniques to atomistic molecular dynamics, conformational sampling between receptor and drug results in improved predictions, such as screening enrichment, discovery of transient cavities, etc. In this review article we perform an extensive analysis of these modeling techniques, dividing them into high and low throughput, and emphasizing in their application to drug design studies. We finalize the review with a section describing our Monte Carlo method, PELE, recently highlighted as an outstanding advance in an international blind competition and industrial benchmarks.We acknowledge the BSC-CRG-IRB Joint Research Program in Computational Biology. This work was supported by a grant from the Spanish Government CTQ2016-79138-R.J.I. acknowledges support from SVP-2014-068797, awarded by the Spanish Government.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Computational Biology and Chemistry

    Get PDF
    The use of computers and software tools in biochemistry (biology) has led to a deep revolution in basic sciences and medicine. Bioinformatics and systems biology are the direct results of this revolution. With the involvement of computers, software tools, and internet services in scientific disciplines comprising biology and chemistry, new terms, technologies, and methodologies appeared and established. Bioinformatic software tools, versatile databases, and easy internet access resulted in the occurrence of computational biology and chemistry. Today, we have new types of surveys and laboratories including “in silico studies” and “dry labs” in which bioinformaticians conduct their investigations to gain invaluable outcomes. These features have led to 3-dimensioned illustrations of different molecules and complexes to get a better understanding of nature

    Modeling Protein-Ligand Interactions with Applications to Drug Design

    Get PDF

    Exploring ligand binding pathways on proteins using hypersound-accelerated molecular dynamics

    Get PDF
    生体分子の動きを効率的に捉えるシミュレーション技術を開発 --超高周波超音波照射によってタンパク質と医薬品の結合計算を加速--. 京都大学プレスリリース. 2021-05-28.Capturing the dynamic processes of biomolecular systems in atomistic detail remains difficult despite recent experimental advances. Although molecular dynamics (MD) techniques enable atomic-level observations, simulations of “slow” biomolecular processes (with timescales longer than submilliseconds) are challenging because of current computer speed limitations. Therefore, we developed a method to accelerate MD simulations by high-frequency ultrasound perturbation. The binding events between the protein CDK2 and its small-molecule inhibitors were nearly undetectable in 100-ns conventional MD, but the method successfully accelerated their slow binding rates by up to 10–20 times. Hypersound-accelerated MD simulations revealed a variety of microscopic kinetic features of the inhibitors on the protein surface, such as the existence of different binding pathways to the active site. Moreover, the simulations allowed the estimation of the corresponding kinetic parameters and exploring other druggable pockets. This method can thus provide deeper insight into the microscopic interactions controlling biomolecular processes

    PLAS-5k: Dataset of Protein-Ligand Affinities from Molecular Dynamics for Machine Learning Applications

    Get PDF
    Computational methods and recently modern machine learning methods have played a key role in structure-based drug design. Though several benchmarking datasets are available for machine learning applications in virtual screening, accurate prediction of binding affinity for a protein-ligand complex remains a major challenge. New datasets that allow for the development of models for predicting binding affinities better than the state-of-the-art scoring functions are important. For the first time, we have developed a dataset, PLAS-5k comprised of 5000 protein-ligand complexes chosen from PDB database. The dataset consists of binding affinities along with energy components like electrostatic, van der Waals, polar and non-polar solvation energy calculated from molecular dynamics simulations using MMPBSA (Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area) method. The calculated binding affinities outperformed docking scores and showed a good correlation with the available experimental values. The availability of energy components may enable optimization of desired components during machine learning-based drug design. Further, OnionNet model has been retrained on PLAS-5k dataset and is provided as a baseline for the prediction of binding affinities

    Improved prediction of ligand-protein binding affinities by meta-modeling

    Full text link
    The accurate screening of candidate drug ligands against target proteins through computational approaches is of prime interest to drug development efforts, as filtering potential candidates would save time and expenses for finding drugs. Such virtual screening depends in part on methods to predict the binding affinity between ligands and proteins. Given many computational models for binding affinity prediction with varying results across targets, we herein develop a meta-modeling framework by integrating published empirical structure-based docking and sequence-based deep learning models. In building this framework, we evaluate many combinations of individual models, training databases, and linear and nonlinear meta-modeling approaches. We show that many of our meta-models significantly improve affinity predictions over individual base models. Our best meta-models achieve comparable performance to state-of-the-art exclusively structure-based deep learning tools. Overall, we demonstrate that diverse modeling approaches can be ensembled together to gain substantial improvement in binding affinity prediction while allowing control over input features such as physicochemical properties or molecular descriptors.Comment: 61 pages, 3 main tables, 6 main figures, 6 supplementary figures, and supporting information. For 8 supplementary tables and code, see https://github.com/Lee1701/Lee2023

    PEPSI-Dock: a detailed data-driven protein–protein interaction potential accelerated by polar Fourier correlation

    Get PDF
    International audienceMotivation: Docking prediction algorithms aim to find the native conformation of a complex of proteins from knowledge of their unbound structures. They rely on a combination of sampling and scoring methods, adapted to different scales. Polynomial Expansion of Protein Structures and Interactions for Docking (PEPSI-Dock) improves the accuracy of the first stage of the docking pipeline , which will sharpen up the final predictions. Indeed, PEPSI-Dock benefits from the precision of a very detailed data-driven model of the binding free energy used with a global and exhaustive rigid-body search space. As well as being accurate, our computations are among the fastest by virtue of the sparse representation of the pre-computed potentials and FFT-accelerated sampling techniques. Overall, this is the first demonstration of a FFT-accelerated docking method coupled with an arbitrary-shaped distance-dependent interaction potential. Results: First, we present a novel learning process to compute data-driven distant-dependent pair-wise potentials, adapted from our previous method used for rescoring of putative protein–protein binding poses. The potential coefficients are learned by combining machine-learning techniques with physically interpretable descriptors. Then, we describe the integration of the deduced potentials into a FFT-accelerated spherical sampling provided by the Hex library. Overall, on a training set of 163 heterodimers, PEPSI-Dock achieves a success rate of 91% mid-quality predictions in the top-10 solutions. On a subset of the protein docking benchmark v5, it achieves 44.4% mid-quality predictions in the top-10 solutions when starting from bound structures and 20.5% when starting from unbound structures. The method runs in 5–15 min on a modern laptop and can easily be extended to other types of interactions. Availability and Implementation: https://team.inria.fr/nano-d/software/PEPSI-Dock. Contact: [email protected]

    Novel algorithms and high-performance cloud computing enable efficient fully quantum mechanical protein-ligand scoring

    Get PDF
    Ranking the binding of small molecules to protein receptors through physics-based computation remains challenging. Though inroads have been made using free energy methods, these fail when the underlying classical mechanical force fields are insufficient. In principle, a more accurate approach is provided by quantum mechanical density functional theory (DFT) scoring, but even with approximations, this has yet to become practical on drug discovery-relevant timescales and resources. Here, we describe how to overcome this barrier using algorithms for DFT calculations that scale on widely available cloud architectures, enabling full density functional theory, without approximations, to be applied to protein-ligand complexes with approximately 2500 atoms in tens of minutes. Applying this to a realistic example of 22 ligands binding to MCL1 reveals that density functional scoring outperforms classical free energy perturbation theory for this system. This raises the possibility of broadly applying fully quantum mechanical scoring to real-world drug discovery pipelines.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures, 1 tabl
    corecore