431 research outputs found
VPSPACE and a transfer theorem over the complex field
We extend the transfer theorem of [KP2007] to the complex field. That is, we
investigate the links between the class VPSPACE of families of polynomials and
the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation over C. Roughly speaking, a family of
polynomials is in VPSPACE if its coefficients can be computed in polynomial
space. Our main result is that if (uniform, constant-free) VPSPACE families can
be evaluated efficiently then the class PAR of decision problems that can be
solved in parallel polynomial time over the complex field collapses to P. As a
result, one must first be able to show that there are VPSPACE families which
are hard to evaluate in order to separate P from NP over C, or even from PAR.Comment: 14 page
On the effects of firing memory in the dynamics of conjunctive networks
Boolean networks are one of the most studied discrete models in the context
of the study of gene expression. In order to define the dynamics associated to
a Boolean network, there are several \emph{update schemes} that range from
parallel or \emph{synchronous} to \emph{asynchronous.} However, studying each
possible dynamics defined by different update schemes might not be efficient.
In this context, considering some type of temporal delay in the dynamics of
Boolean networks emerges as an alternative approach. In this paper, we focus in
studying the effect of a particular type of delay called \emph{firing memory}
in the dynamics of Boolean networks. Particularly, we focus in symmetric
(non-directed) conjunctive networks and we show that there exist examples that
exhibit attractors of non-polynomial period. In addition, we study the
prediction problem consisting in determinate if some vertex will eventually
change its state, given an initial condition. We prove that this problem is
{\bf PSPACE}-complete
Strong ETH Breaks With Merlin and Arthur: Short Non-Interactive Proofs of Batch Evaluation
We present an efficient proof system for Multipoint Arithmetic Circuit
Evaluation: for every arithmetic circuit of size and
degree over a field , and any inputs ,
the Prover sends the Verifier the values and a proof of length, and
the Verifier tosses coins and can check the proof in about time, with probability of error less than .
For small degree , this "Merlin-Arthur" proof system (a.k.a. MA-proof
system) runs in nearly-linear time, and has many applications. For example, we
obtain MA-proof systems that run in time (for various ) for the
Permanent, Circuit-SAT for all sublinear-depth circuits, counting
Hamiltonian cycles, and infeasibility of - linear programs. In general,
the value of any polynomial in Valiant's class can be certified
faster than "exhaustive summation" over all possible assignments. These results
strongly refute a Merlin-Arthur Strong ETH and Arthur-Merlin Strong ETH posed
by Russell Impagliazzo and others.
We also give a three-round (AMA) proof system for quantified Boolean formulas
running in time, nearly-linear time MA-proof systems for
counting orthogonal vectors in a collection and finding Closest Pairs in the
Hamming metric, and a MA-proof system running in -time for
counting -cliques in graphs.
We point to some potential future directions for refuting the
Nondeterministic Strong ETH.Comment: 17 page
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
- …