2,574 research outputs found

    The 2+12+1 convex hull of a finite set

    Full text link
    We study R2⊕R\mathbb{R}^2\oplus\mathbb{R}-separately convex hulls of finite sets of points in R3\mathbb{R}^3, as introduced in \cite{KirchheimMullerSverak2003}. When R3\mathbb{R}^3 is considered as a certain subset of 3×23\times 2 matrices, this notion of convexity corresponds to rank-one convex convexity KrcK^{rc}. If R3\mathbb{R}^3 is identified instead with a subset of 2×32\times 3 matrices, it actually agrees with the quasiconvex hull, due to a recent result \cite{HarrisKirchheimLin18}. We introduce "2+12+1 complexes", which generalize TnT_n constructions. For a finite set KK, a "2+12+1 KK-complex" is a 2+12+1 complex whose extremal points belong to KK. The "2+12+1-complex convex hull of KK", KccK^{cc}, is the union of all 2+12+1 KK-complexes. We prove that KccK^{cc} is contained in the 2+12+1 convex hull KrcK^{rc}. We also consider outer approximations to 2+12+1 convexity based in the locality theorem \cite[4.7]{Kirchheim2003}. Starting with a crude outer approximation we iteratively chop off "DD-prisms". For the examples in \cite{KirchheimMullerSverak2003}, and many others, this procedure reaches a "2+12+1 KK-complex" in a finite number of steps, and thus computes the 2+12+1 convex hull. We show examples of finite sets for which this procedure does not reach the 2+12+1 convex hull in finite time, but we show that a sequence of outer approximations built with DD-prisms converges to a 2+12+1 KK-complex. We conclude that KrcK^{rc} is always a "2+12+1 KK-complex", which has interesting consequences

    Relative Convex Hull Determination from Convex Hulls in the Plane

    Full text link
    A new algorithm for the determination of the relative convex hull in the plane of a simple polygon A with respect to another simple polygon B which contains A, is proposed. The relative convex hull is also known as geodesic convex hull, and the problem of its determination in the plane is equivalent to find the shortest curve among all Jordan curves lying in the difference set of B and A and encircling A. Algorithms solving this problem known from Computational Geometry are based on the triangulation or similar decomposition of that difference set. The algorithm presented here does not use such decomposition, but it supposes that A and B are given as ordered sequences of vertices. The algorithm is based on convex hull calculations of A and B and of smaller polygons and polylines, it produces the output list of vertices of the relative convex hull from the sequence of vertices of the convex hull of A.Comment: 15 pages, 4 figures, Conference paper published. We corrected two typing errors in Definition 2: ISI_S has to be defined based on OSO_S, and IEI_E has to be defined based on OEO_E (not just using OO). These errors appeared in the text of the original conference paper, which also contained the pseudocode of an algorithm where ISI_S and IEI_E appeared as correctly define

    Inner and Outer Rounding of Boolean Operations on Lattice Polygonal Regions

    Get PDF
    Robustness problems due to the substitution of the exact computation on real numbers by the rounded floating point arithmetic are often an obstacle to obtain practical implementation of geometric algorithms. If the adoption of the --exact computation paradigm--[Yap et Dube] gives a satisfactory solution to this kind of problems for purely combinatorial algorithms, this solution does not allow to solve in practice the case of algorithms that cascade the construction of new geometric objects. In this report, we consider the problem of rounding the intersection of two polygonal regions onto the integer lattice with inclusion properties. Namely, given two polygonal regions A and B having their vertices on the integer lattice, the inner and outer rounding modes construct two polygonal regions with integer vertices which respectively is included and contains the true intersection. We also prove interesting results on the Hausdorff distance, the size and the convexity of these polygonal regions

    Algebraic pairs of isometries

    Full text link
    We consider pairs of commuting isometries that are annihilated by a polynomial. We show that the polynomial must be inner toral, which is a geometric condition on its zero set. We show that cyclic pairs of commuting isometries are nearly unitarily equivalent if they are annihilated by the same minimal polynomial

    Approximating the Maximum Overlap of Polygons under Translation

    Full text link
    Let PP and QQ be two simple polygons in the plane of total complexity nn, each of which can be decomposed into at most kk convex parts. We present an (1−ε)(1-\varepsilon)-approximation algorithm, for finding the translation of QQ, which maximizes its area of overlap with PP. Our algorithm runs in O(cn)O(c n) time, where cc is a constant that depends only on kk and ε\varepsilon. This suggest that for polygons that are "close" to being convex, the problem can be solved (approximately), in near linear time
    • …
    corecore