The Simplest Evaluation Measures for XML Information Retrieval that Could Possibly Work

This paper reviews several evaluation measures developed for evaluating XML information retrieval (IR) systems. We argue that these measures, some of which are currently in use by the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX), are complicated, hard to understand, and hard to explain to users of XML IR systems. To show the value of keeping things simple, we report alternative evaluation results of official evaluation runs submitted to INEX 2004 using simple metrics, and show its value for INEX

UJM at INEX 2008: pre impacting of tags weights

International audienceThis paper addresses the integration of tags in terms weighting function for focused XML retrieval. Our model allows to consider a certain kind of structural information: tags that represent logical structure (title, section, etc.) as well as tags related to formatting (bold font, centered text, etc.). We first take into account the tags influence by estimating the probability that tags distinguishes terms which are the most relevant. Then, these weights are impacted on terms weighting function using several combining schemes. Experiments on a large collection during INEX 2008 XML IR evaluation campaign (INitiative for Evaluation of XML Retrieval) showed that using tags leads to improvements on focused retrieval

Evaluation of effective XML information retrieval

XML is being adopted as a common storage format in scientific data repositories, digital libraries, and on the World Wide Web. Accordingly, there is a need for content-oriented XML retrieval systems that can efficiently and effectively store, search and retrieve information from XML document collections. Unlike traditional information retrieval systems where whole documents are usually indexed and retrieved as information units, XML retrieval systems typically index and retrieve document components of varying granularity. To evaluate the effectiveness of such systems, test collections where relevance assessments are provided according to an XML-specific definition of relevance are necessary. Such test collections have been built during four rounds of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX). There are many different approaches to XML retrieval; most approaches either extend full-text information retrieval systems to handle XML retrieval, or use database technologies that incorporate existing XML standards to handle both XML presentation and retrieval. We present a hybrid approach to XML retrieval that combines text information retrieval features with XML-specific features found in a native XML database. Results from our experiments on the INEX 2003 and 2004 test collections demonstrate the usefulness of applying our hybrid approach to different XML retrieval tasks. A realistic definition of relevance is necessary for meaningful comparison of alternative XML retrieval approaches. The three relevance definitions used by INEX since 2002 comprise two relevance dimensions, each based on topical relevance. We perform an extensive analysis of the two INEX 2004 and 2005 relevance definitions, and show that assessors and users find them difficult to understand. We propose a new definition of relevance for XML retrieval, and demonstrate that a relevance scale based on this definition is useful for XML retrieval experiments. Finding the appropriate approach to evaluate XML retrieval effectiveness is the subject of ongoing debate within the XML information retrieval research community. We present an overview of the evaluation methodologies implemented in the current INEX metrics, which reveals that the metrics follow different assumptions and measure different XML retrieval behaviours. We propose a new evaluation metric for XML retrieval and conduct an extensive analysis of the retrieval performance of simulated runs to show what is measured. We compare the evaluation behaviour obtained with the new metric to the behaviours obtained with two of the official INEX 2005 metrics, and demonstrate that the new metric can be used to reliably evaluate XML retrieval effectiveness. To analyse the effectiveness of XML retrieval in different application scenarios, we use evaluation measures in our new metric to investigate the behaviour of XML retrieval approaches under the following two scenarios: the ad-hoc retrieval scenario, exploring the activities carried out as part of the INEX 2005 Ad-hoc track; and the multimedia retrieval scenario, exploring the activities carried out as part of the INEX 2005 Multimedia track. For both application scenarios we show that, although different values for retrieval parameters are needed to achieve the optimal performance, the desired textual or multimedia information can be effectively located using a combination of XML retrieval approaches

The Role of Context in Matching and Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval

Sähköisten kokoelmien kasvun, hakujen arkipäiväistymisen ja mobiililaitteiden yleistymisen myötä yksi tiedonhaun menetelmien kehittämisen tavoitteista on saavuttaa alati tarkempia hakutuloksia; pitkistäkin dokumenteista oleellinen sisältö pyritään osoittamaan hakijalle tarkasti. Tiedonhakija pyritään siis vapauttamaan turhasta dokumenttien selaamisesta. Internetissä ja muussa sähköisessä julkaisemisessa dokumenttien osat merkitään usein XML-kielen avulla dokumenttien automaattista käsittelyä varten. XML-merkkaus mahdollistaa dokumenttien sisäisen rakenteen hyödyntämisen. Toisin sanoen tätä merkkausta voidaan hyödyntää kehitettäessä tarkkuusorientoituneita (kohdennettuja) tiedonhakujärjestelmiä ja menetelmiä. Väitöskirja käsittelee tarkkuusorientoitunutta tiedonhakua, jossa eksplisiittistä XML merkkausta voidaan hyödyntää. Väitöskirjassa on kaksi pääteemaa, joista ensimmäisen käsittelee XML -tiedonhakujärjestelmä TRIX:in (Tampere Retrieval and Indexing for XML) kehittämistä, toteuttamista ja arviointia. Toinen teema käsittelee kohdennettujen tiedonhakujärjestelmien empiirisiä arviointimenetelmiä. Ensimmäisen teeman merkittävin kontribuutio on kontekstualisointi, jolloin täsmäytyksessä XML-tiedonhaulle tyypillistä tekstievidenssin vähäisyyttä kompensoidaan hyödyntämällä XML-hierarkian ylempien tai rinnakkaisten osien sisältöä (so. kontekstia). Menetelmän toimivuus osoitetaan empiirisin menetelmin. Tutkimuksen seurauksena kontekstualisointi (contextualization) on vakiintunut alan yleiseen, kansainväliseen sanastoon. Toisessa teemassa todetaan kohdennetun tiedonhaun vaikuttavuuden mittaamiseen käytettävien menetelmien olevan monin tavoin puutteellisia. Puutteiden korjaamiseksi väitöskirjassa kehitetään realistisempia arviointimenetelmiä, jotka ottavat huomioon palautettavien hakuyksiköiden kontekstin, lukemisjärjestyksen ja käyttäjälle selailusta koituvan vaivan. Tutkimuksessa kehitetty mittari (T2I(300)) on valittu varsinaiseksi mittariksi kansainvälisessä INEX (Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval) hankkeessa, joka on vuonna 2002 perustettu XML tiedonhaun tutkimusfoorumi.This dissertation addresses focused retrieval, especially its sub-concept XML (eXtensible Mark-up Language) information retrieval (XML IR). In XML IR, the retrievable units are either individual elements, or sets of elements grouped together typically by a document. These units are ranked according to their estimated relevance by an XML IR system. In traditional information retrieval, the retrievable unit is an atomic document. Due to this atomicity, many core characteristics of such document retrieval paradigm are not appropriate for XML IR. Of these characteristics, this dissertation explores element indexing, scoring and evaluation methods which form two main themes: 1. Element indexing, scoring, and contextualization 2. Focused retrieval evaluation To investigate the first theme, an XML IR system based on structural indices is constructed. The structural indices offer analyzing power for studying element hierarchies. The main finding in the system development is the utilization of surrounding elements as supplementary evidence in element scoring. This method is called contextualization, for which we distinguish three models: vertical, horizontal and ad hoc contextualizations. The models are tested with the tools provided by (or derived from) the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX). The results indicate that the evidence from element surroundings improves the scoring effectiveness of XML retrieval. The second theme entails a task where the retrievable elements are grouped by a document. The aim of this theme is to create methods measuring XML IR effectiveness in a credible fashion in a laboratory environment. The credibility is pursued by assuming the chronological reading order of a user together with a point where the user becomes frustrated after reading a certain amount of non-relevant material. Novel metrics are created based on these assumptions. The relative rankings of systems measured with the metrics differ from those delivered by contemporary metrics. In addition, the focused retrieval strategies benefit from the novel metrics over traditional full document retrieval

A Recommender System For Social Book Search

University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. August 2014. Major: Computer Science. Advisor: Carolyn Crouch. 1 computer file (PDF); vi, 21 pages.Information retrieval (IR) is a field of computing which deals with storing and retrieving document information. The World Wide Web (WWW) contains a vast amount of information. Storage and retrieval of this information is a huge task. Extensible Markup Language (XML) is used to represent documents so that portions (or elements) may be effectively retrieved. INEX (Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval) is a forum for experimental XML retrieval. It is used to evaluate XML retrieval systems and provides a number of tracks (e.g., Social Book Search, Linked Data, and Tweet Contextualization) and evaluation strategies for the systems designed by competing teams. It also provides a set of XML documents and queries that can be used as a test bed. This thesis focuses on the 2014 INEX Social Book Search (SBS) Suggestion task. The goal of this track is to provide support to users in searching and navigating a large set of books using professional and metadata and user-generated content. In this task, given book requests from LibraryThing discussion forums and a collection of 2.8 million book descriptions from Amazon and LibraryThing, a ranked list of book suggestions is returned to the user. The methodology (based on traditional retrieval and recommendation), the experimental results, and conclusions are described herein

Hybrid XML Retrieval: Combining Information Retrieval and a Native XML Database

This paper investigates the impact of three approaches to XML retrieval: using Zettair, a full-text information retrieval system; using eXist, a native XML database; and using a hybrid system that takes full article answers from Zettair and uses eXist to extract elements from those articles. For the content-only topics, we undertake a preliminary analysis of the INEX 2003 relevance assessments in order to identify the types of highly relevant document components. Further analysis identifies two complementary sub-cases of relevance assessments ("General" and "Specific") and two categories of topics ("Broad" and "Narrow"). We develop a novel retrieval module that for a content-only topic utilises the information from the resulting answer list of a native XML database and dynamically determines the preferable units of retrieval, which we call "Coherent Retrieval Elements". The results of our experiments show that -- when each of the three systems is evaluated against different retrieval scenarios (such as different cases of relevance assessments, different topic categories and different choices of evaluation metrics) -- the XML retrieval systems exhibit varying behaviour and the best performance can be reached for different values of the retrieval parameters. In the case of INEX 2003 relevance assessments for the content-only topics, our newly developed hybrid XML retrieval system is substantially more effective than either Zettair or eXist, and yields a robust and a very effective XML retrieval.Comment: Postprint version. The editor version can be accessed through the DO

Combining Indexing Schemes to Accelerate Querying XML on Content and Structure

This paper presents the advantages of combining multiple document representation schemes for query processing of XML queries on content and structure. We show how extending the Text Region approach [2] with the main features of the Binary Relation approach developed in [8] leads to a considerable speed-up in the processing of the XPath location steps. We detail how, by using the combined scheme, we reduce the number of structural joins used to process the XPath steps, while simultaneously limiting the amount of memory usage. We discuss optimisation strategies enabled by the new `combined representation scheme'. Experiments comparing the efficiency of alternative query processing strategies on a subset of the queries used at INEX 2003 (the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval [4]) demonstrate a favourable performance for the combined indexing scheme

Enhancing Content-And-Structure Information Retrieval using a Native XML Database

Three approaches to content-and-structure XML retrieval are analysed in this paper: first by using Zettair, a full-text information retrieval system; second by using eXist, a native XML database, and third by using a hybrid XML retrieval system that uses eXist to produce the final answers from likely relevant articles retrieved by Zettair. INEX 2003 content-and-structure topics can be classified in two categories: the first retrieving full articles as final answers, and the second retrieving more specific elements within articles as final answers. We show that for both topic categories our initial hybrid system improves the retrieval effectiveness of a native XML database. For ranking the final answer elements, we propose and evaluate a novel retrieval model that utilises the structural relationships between the answer elements of a native XML database and retrieves Coherent Retrieval Elements. The final results of our experiments show that when the XML retrieval task focusses on highly relevant elements our hybrid XML retrieval system with the Coherent Retrieval Elements module is 1.8 times more effective than Zettair and 3 times more effective than eXist, and yields an effective content-and-structure XML retrieval