850 research outputs found
LIPIcs
We study two-player zero-sum games over infinite-state graphs equipped with ωB and finitary conditions. Our first contribution is about the strategy complexity, i.e the memory required for winning strategies: we prove that over general infinite-state graphs, memoryless strategies are sufficient for finitary Büchi, and finite-memory suffices for finitary parity games. We then study pushdown games with boundedness conditions, with two contributions. First we prove a collapse result for pushdown games with ωB-conditions, implying the decidability of solving these games. Second we consider pushdown games with finitary parity along with stack boundedness conditions, and show that solving these games is EXPTIME-complete
Parity and Streett Games with Costs
We consider two-player games played on finite graphs equipped with costs on
edges and introduce two winning conditions, cost-parity and cost-Streett, which
require bounds on the cost between requests and their responses. Both
conditions generalize the corresponding classical omega-regular conditions and
the corresponding finitary conditions. For parity games with costs we show that
the first player has positional winning strategies and that determining the
winner lies in NP and coNP. For Streett games with costs we show that the first
player has finite-state winning strategies and that determining the winner is
EXPTIME-complete. The second player might need infinite memory in both games.
Both types of games with costs can be solved by solving linearly many instances
of their classical variants.Comment: A preliminary version of this work appeared in FSTTCS 2012 under the
name "Cost-parity and Cost-Streett Games". The research leading to these
results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreements 259454 (GALE) and 239850
(SOSNA
Parity games with weights
Quantitative extensions of parity games have recently attracted significant interest. These extensions include parity games with energy and payoff conditions as well as finitary parity games and their generalization to parity games with costs. Finitary parity games enjoy a special status among these extensions, as they offer a native combination of the qualitative and quantitative aspects in infinite games: The quantitative aspect of finitary parity games is a quality measure for the qualitative aspect, as it measures the limit superior of the time it takes to answer an odd color by a larger even one. Finitary parity games have been extended to parity games with costs, where each transition is labeled with a nonnegative weight that reflects the costs incurred by taking it. We lift this restriction and consider parity games with costs with arbitrary integer weights. We show that solving such games is in NP and coNP, the signature complexity for games of this type. We also show that the protagonist has finite-state winning strategies, and provide tight pseudo-polynomial bounds for the memory he needs to win the game. Naturally, the antagonist may need infinite memory to win. Moreover, we present tight bounds on the quality of winning strategies for the protagonist. Furthermore, we investigate the problem of determining, for a given threshold b, whether the protagonist has a strategy of quality at most b and show this problem to be EXPTIME-complete. The protagonist inherits the necessity of exponential memory for implementing such strategies from the special case of finitary parity games
Finitary languages
The class of omega-regular languages provides a robust specification language
in verification. Every omega-regular condition can be decomposed into a safety
part and a liveness part. The liveness part ensures that something good happens
"eventually". Finitary liveness was proposed by Alur and Henzinger as a
stronger formulation of liveness. It requires that there exists an unknown,
fixed bound b such that something good happens within b transitions. In this
work we consider automata with finitary acceptance conditions defined by
finitary Buchi, parity and Streett languages. We study languages expressible by
such automata: we give their topological complexity and present a
regular-expression characterization. We compare the expressive power of
finitary automata and give optimal algorithms for classical decisions
questions. We show that the finitary languages are Sigma 2-complete; we present
a complete picture of the expressive power of various classes of automata with
finitary and infinitary acceptance conditions; we show that the languages
defined by finitary parity automata exactly characterize the star-free fragment
of omega B-regular languages; and we show that emptiness is NLOGSPACE-complete
and universality as well as language inclusion are PSPACE-complete for finitary
parity and Streett automata
Formats of Winning Strategies for Six Types of Pushdown Games
The solution of parity games over pushdown graphs (Walukiewicz '96) was the
first step towards an effective theory of infinite-state games. It was shown
that winning strategies for pushdown games can be implemented again as pushdown
automata. We continue this study and investigate the connection between game
presentations and winning strategies in altogether six cases of game arenas,
among them realtime pushdown systems, visibly pushdown systems, and counter
systems. In four cases we show by a uniform proof method that we obtain
strategies implementable by the same type of pushdown machine as given in the
game arena. We prove that for the two remaining cases this correspondence
fails. In the conclusion we address the question of an abstract criterion that
explains the results
Propositional computability logic I
In the same sense as classical logic is a formal theory of truth, the
recently initiated approach called computability logic is a formal theory of
computability. It understands (interactive) computational problems as games
played by a machine against the environment, their computability as existence
of a machine that always wins the game, logical operators as operations on
computational problems, and validity of a logical formula as being a scheme of
"always computable" problems. The present contribution gives a detailed
exposition of a soundness and completeness proof for an axiomatization of one
of the most basic fragments of computability logic. The logical vocabulary of
this fragment contains operators for the so called parallel and choice
operations, and its atoms represent elementary problems, i.e. predicates in the
standard sense. This article is self-contained as it explains all relevant
concepts. While not technically necessary, however, familiarity with the
foundational paper "Introduction to computability logic" [Annals of Pure and
Applied Logic 123 (2003), pp.1-99] would greatly help the reader in
understanding the philosophy, underlying motivations, potential and utility of
computability logic, -- the context that determines the value of the present
results. Online introduction to the subject is available at
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html and
http://www.csc.villanova.edu/~japaridz/CL/gsoll.html .Comment: To appear in ACM Transactions on Computational Logi
Relational semantics of linear logic and higher-order model-checking
In this article, we develop a new and somewhat unexpected connection between
higher-order model-checking and linear logic. Our starting point is the
observation that once embedded in the relational semantics of linear logic, the
Church encoding of any higher-order recursion scheme (HORS) comes together with
a dual Church encoding of an alternating tree automata (ATA) of the same
signature. Moreover, the interaction between the relational interpretations of
the HORS and of the ATA identifies the set of accepting states of the tree
automaton against the infinite tree generated by the recursion scheme. We show
how to extend this result to alternating parity automata (APT) by introducing a
parametric version of the exponential modality of linear logic, capturing the
formal properties of colors (or priorities) in higher-order model-checking. We
show in particular how to reunderstand in this way the type-theoretic approach
to higher-order model-checking developed by Kobayashi and Ong. We briefly
explain in the end of the paper how his analysis driven by linear logic results
in a new and purely semantic proof of decidability of the formulas of the
monadic second-order logic for higher-order recursion schemes.Comment: 24 pages. Submitte
- …