Proving Looping and Non-Looping Non-Termination by Finite Automata

A new technique is presented to prove non-termination of term rewriting. The basic idea is to find a non-empty regular language of terms that is closed under rewriting and does not contain normal forms. It is automated by representing the language by a tree automaton with a fixed number of states, and expressing the mentioned requirements in a SAT formula. Satisfiability of this formula implies non-termination. Our approach succeeds for many examples where all earlier techniques fail, for instance for the S-rule from combinatory logic

Expression-based aliasing for OO-languages

Alias analysis has been an interesting research topic in verification and optimization of programs. The undecidability of determining whether two expressions in a program may reference to the same object is the main source of the challenges raised in alias analysis. In this paper we propose an extension of a previously introduced alias calculus based on program expressions, to the setting of unbounded program executions s.a. infinite loops and recursive calls. Moreover, we devise a corresponding executable specification in the K-framework. An important property of our extension is that, in a non-concurrent setting, the corresponding alias expressions can be over-approximated in terms of a notion of regular expressions. This further enables us to show that the associated K-machinery implements an algorithm that always stops and provides a sound over-approximation of the "may aliasing" information, where soundness stands for the lack of false negatives. As a case study, we analyze the integration and further applications of the alias calculus in SCOOP. The latter is an object-oriented programming model for concurrency, recently formalized in Maude; K-definitions can be compiled into Maude for execution

Efficient recursion termination for function-free horn logic

We present an efficient scheme to terminate infinite recursion in function-free Horn logic. In [BW84], Brough and Walker show that a preorder linear resolution with a goal termination strategy is incomplete, i.e. it must miss some answers. Their theory is true if left-recursion is allowed. The crucial assumption underlying Brough and Walker's theory is that the order of literals in a clause should not be altered. This assumption, however, is not necessary in programs that do not contain any extra-logical features such as the 'cut' symbol of Prolog. This is because the order of literals does not affect the correctness of such programs, only their efficiency. In this paper, we show that left-recursion can always be eliminated. The idea is to transform loops of the input set into safe loops, that are left-recursion free. Consequently, the goal termination strategy guarantees to always terminate properly with all possible answers; thus, it is complete in the domain of safe loops. We further show that all rules in a safe loop can be transformed into rules that begin with a base literal. This permits the implementation of a simple scheme to carry out the goal termination strategy more efficiently. The basic idea of this scheme is to distribute the history containing all executed goals over assertions, rather than maintaining it as a centralized data structure. This reduces the amount of work performed during execution