208 research outputs found

    Diagnosis and monitoring of Alzheimer's patients using classical and deep learning techniques

    Get PDF
    Machine based analysis and prediction systems are widely used for diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, lower accuracy of existing techniques and lack of post diagnosis monitoring systems limit the scope of such studies. In this paper, a novel machine learning based diagnosis and monitoring of AD-like diseases is proposed. The AD-like diseases diagnosis process is accomplished by analysing the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using deep learning and is followed by an activity monitoring framework to monitor the subjectsโ€™ activities of daily living using body worn inertial sensors. The activity monitoring provides an assistive framework in daily life activities and evaluates vulnerability of the patients based on the activity level. The AD diagnosis results show up to 82% improvement in comparison to well-known existing techniques. Moreover, above 95% accuracy is achieved to classify the activities of daily living which is quite encouraging in terms of monitoring the activity profile of the subject

    The use of wearable/portable digital sensors in Huntingtonโ€™s disease: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    In chronic neurological conditions, wearable/portable devices have potential as innovative tools to detect subtle early disease manifestations and disease fluctuations for the purpose of clinical diagnosis, care and therapeutic development. Huntingtonโ€™s disease (HD) has a unique combination of motor and non-motor features which, combined with recent and anticipated therapeutic progress, gives great potential for such devices to prove useful. The present work aims to provide a comprehensive account of the use of wearable/portable devices in HD and of what they have contributed so far. We conducted a systematic review searching MEDLINE, Embase, and IEEE Xplore. Thirty references were identified. Our results revealed large variability in the types of sensors used, study design, and the measured outcomes. Digital technologies show considerable promise for therapeutic research and clinical management of HD. However, more studies with standardized devices and harmonized protocols are needed to optimize the potential applicability of wearable/portable devices in HD

    the wearable devices opportunity

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2022. 8. ๊น€๊ธฐ์›….๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ : ์น˜๋งค๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ณต๊ณต๋ณด๊ฑด ๋ถ€๋‹ด์ด ๊ฐ€์ค‘๋จ์—๋„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ถ€์žฌํ•œ ํ˜„ ์ƒํ™ฉ์€ ์น˜๋งค ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘์„ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ง„ํ–‰์„ ์ง€์—ฐ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜ ๋˜๋Š” ์น˜๋งค ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์„ ์กฐ๊ธฐ์— ์‹๋ณ„ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ํ•„์š”๋ฅผ ๋”์šฑ ๋ถ€๊ฐ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์‹œ ํ•œ๋ฐœ-ํ•œ๋ฐœ ์‚ฌ์ด ๋ณดํ–‰์ธ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ์ธ์ง€ ์ €ํ•˜, ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์•  ๋ฐ ์น˜๋งค์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์›จ์–ด๋Ÿฌ๋ธ” ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์€ ๊ฐ๋…์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ž์—ฐ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋” ์˜ค๋žœ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’์„ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ๋งํ•œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งˆ์ปค๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š”, ์‹ ์ฒด์— ๋ถ€์ฐฉํ•œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์‚ผ์ถ•๊ฐ€์†๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋œ ๋ณดํ–‰ ๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งˆ์ปค๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ ์ฒด ๋ถ€์ฐฉ ์‚ผ์ถ•๊ฐ€์†๊ณ„๋กœ ์–ป์€ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ์ •์ƒ์ธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋…ธ์ธ์—์„œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋” ํฐ ํ‘œ๋ณธ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋น„์น˜๋งค ๋…ธ์ธ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งˆ์ปค๋กœ์„œ ๋ณดํ–‰ ๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์งˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋†’์€ ๋ณดํ–‰ ๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์–ต ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์ง„ ๋‡Œ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ์–‡์•„์ง„ ๋Œ€๋‡Œ ํ”ผ์งˆ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์˜์—ญ์ด ๋ณดํ–‰-์ธ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต์œ  ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ธฐ์งˆ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ I์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‡Œํ—ˆํ˜ˆ์ด๋‚˜ ํŒŒํ‚จ์Šจ๋ณ‘์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉด์„œ, ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ์— ๊ฑฐ์ฃผํ•˜๋Š”, ์ธ์ง€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ •์ƒ์ธ ๋…ธ์ธ 91๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 4๋…„ ์ „ํ–ฅ์  ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒด์ค‘์‹ฌ์— ๋ถ€์ฐฉํ•œ ์‚ผ์ถ•๊ฐ€์†๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ ์›Œํ‚น ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ์ง„๋‹จ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€ ์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ ์ง„๋‹จํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋ณดํ–‰ ๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋ฅผ ์‚ผ๋ถ„์œ„์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์ผ๋ถ„์œ„ ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ 4๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘์„ ์ถ”์ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์•  ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๋น„๊ต๋Š” Log-rank test์™€ Kaplan-Meier ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์•  ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์œ„ํ—˜๋น„(Hazard Ratio, HR)๋Š” ์—ฐ๋ น, ์„ฑ๋ณ„, ๊ต์œก์ˆ˜์ค€, ๋ˆ„์ ์งˆ๋ณ‘ํ‰๊ฐ€์ฒ™๋„ ์ ์ˆ˜, GDS ์ ์ˆ˜, ์•„ํฌ์ง€๋‹จ๋ฐฑ E ฮต4 ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ์œ ์ „์ž ์œ ๋ฌด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ •ํ•œ ์ฝ•์Šค ๋น„๋ก€์œ„ํ—˜ ํšŒ๊ท€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ II์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 207๋ช…์˜ ์น˜๋งค๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ๋…ธ์ธ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ ๋‡Œ ํ”ผ์งˆ ๋ฐ ํ”ผ์งˆ ํ•˜ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ-์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์˜ ๊ณต์œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์งˆ์„ ํšก๋‹จ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช…์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๋‡Œ ํ”ผ์งˆ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ํ”ผ์งˆ ํ•˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ, ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ, ํ”ผ์งˆ ๋‘๊ป˜์™€ ํ”ผ์งˆ ํ•˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์™€์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์–‘์ชฝ์— ๋ชจ๋‘ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๋‡Œ์˜์—ญ์˜ ํ”ผ์งˆ ๋‘๊ป˜ ๋˜๋Š” ํ”ผ์งˆ ํ•˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ์—ฐ๊ตฌ I์—์„œ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ์ผ๋ถ„์œ„์— ์†ํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ธ์ธ๋“ค์€ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ธ๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด์„œ 4๋…„ ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์•  ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์•ฝ 12๋ฐฐ ๋” ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. (HR = 11.97, 95% CI = 1.29โ€“111.37). ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Š๋ฆฐ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋…ธ์ธ๋“ค์€ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๋…ธ์ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์•  ๋ฐœ๋ณ‘์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (HR = 5.04, 95% CI = 0.53โ€“48.18). ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์—๋Š” ์„ฑ๋ณ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ฐํ˜”๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋“ค์„ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์‚ผ๋ถ„์œ„ํ™” ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ํšจ๊ณผ (threshold effect) ์œ ๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ณดํ–‰์†๋„๋ฅผ ์—ฐ์†๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‘๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ์—๋„ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด 10% ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•  ๋•Œ๋งˆ๋‹ค ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด 1.5๋ฐฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋ณดํ–‰์†๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธ์ง€๊ฐํ‡ด ์œ„ํ—˜์˜ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ II์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์ด ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ๋Œ€๋‡Œํ”ผ์งˆ ๋‘๊ป˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์€ ํ”ผ์งˆ ํ•˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์™€๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ๊ณผ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ ํ”ผ์งˆ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ ์ค‘ ์ขŒ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ์˜ inferior temporal, entorhinal, parahippocampal, fusiform, and lingual์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ์˜ ํ”ผ์งˆ ๋‘๊ป˜๋Š” ์ „๋ฐ˜์  ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ์–ธ์–ด๊ธฐ์–ต๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ฐ ํ•ด์„: ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š”, ์‹ ์ฒด๋ถ€์ฐฉ ๋‹จ์ผ ์‚ผ์ถ•๊ฐ€์†๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๋ณดํ–‰๋ณ€์ด์„ฑ์˜ ์ธ์ง€์ €ํ•˜ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งˆ์ปค๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.Background and Objectives: Large public health burden of dementia and the absence of a cure highlight the need for early identification of those at risk for cognitive decline or dementia to prevent and/or delay the onset of dementia. Emerging evidence indicates gait variability, the fluctuation of a gait measure from one step to the next, strongly relate to the risk of cognitive decline, MCI and dementia. Gait variability obtain via wearable sensor is a promising digital biomarker for predicting risk of cognitive impairment due to its favorable practical advantages of being able to obtain measurements over a longer period of time under unsupervised real-world conditions at lower cost. In my thesis, I examine the possibility that gait variability measured by a single body-worn tri-axial accelerometer (TAA) can be used as a digital biomarker to predict future risk of cognitive decline. In the first study, I examined whether gait variability obtained by the body-worn TAA could predict future risk of cognitive decline in older people with normal cognition (NC). In the second study, I then identify neural substrates that theoretically support the potential of gait variability as a digital biomarker in older adults with larger sample size and broader range of cognitive function. Additionally, I hypothesized higher gait variability would be related to lower cortical thickness, especially in regions important for cognitive function and memory, and that these regions would represent a shared neural substrate for gait control and cognitive impairment. Methods: In the study I, we conducted 4-year prospective cohort study on 91 community-dwelling cognitively normal elderly individuals without cerebral ischemic burden or Parkinsonism. We evaluated gait speed and step time variability using a TAA placed on the center of body mass, and diagnosed mild cognitive impairment (MCI) according to the International Working Group on MCI. We performed Kaplan-Meier analysis with consecutive log-rank testing for MCI-free survival by cohort-specific tertiles of gait variability; hazard ratios (HR) of incident MCI were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, education level, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score, GDS score, and presence of the apolipoprotein E ฮต4 allele. In the study II, we cross-sectionally investigated the cortical and subcortical neural structures associated with gait variability, and the shared neural substrates of gait variability and cognitive function in 207 non-demented older adults. We obtained the cortical thickness and subcortical volumes from the magnetic resonance images, and examined associations between gait variability, cognitive function, and cortical thickness and subcortical volumes. Finally, we analyzed the mediation effect of the cluster cortical thickness and subcortical volume which had a significant association with both gait variability and cognitive function on the association between gait variability and cognition. Results: In the study I, subjects with high gait variability showed about 12-fold higher risk of MCI (HR = 11.97, 95% CI = 1.29โ€“111.37) than those with mid-to-low variability. However, those with slow gait speed showed comparable MCI risk to those with mid-to-high speed (HR = 5.04, 95% CI = 0.53โ€“ 48.18). We additionally found that no sex differences were found when assessing the ability of high gait variability to predict future cognitive decline. When we computed gait variability and gait speed as continuous variables to explore whether there are any threshold effects, the risk of incident cognitive decline increased 1.5 times per 10% increment of gait variability, whereas it did not change significantly with changes of gait speed. In the study II, higher gait variability was associated with lower cognitive functions. We found the widespread decrease in cortical thickness with increasing gait variability while there was no significant association with the volume of subcortical structures. Among the clusters that showed significant correlation with the gait variability, a cluster that included the inferior temporal, entorhinal, parahippocampal, fusiform, and lingual in left hemisphere was also associated with global cognitive function, and verbal memory function. Cortical thickness of the cluster explained 17% of the total effect of gait variability on global cognitive function measured by CERAD-TS. Interpretation: Gait variability measured by a single body-worn TAA could be a novel digital biomarker of risk of cognitive decline that could be used repeatedly and frequently and at low cost to test risk of individuals without clinical evidence of cognitive impairments.I Introduction 10 1. Study background 11 2. Purpose of research 16 II Methods 18 1. Study 1: Can gait variability predict the risk of cognitive decline in cognitively normal elderly? 19 1.1. Study population 19 1.2. Clinical assessments 20 1.3. Gait Assessments 22 1.4. Statistical analysis 23 2. Study 2: Shared Neural Substrates between Gait Variability-Cognitive Function 24 2.1. Study population 24 2.2. Assessments of cognition and medical conditions 25 2.3. Gait assessments 26 2.4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and preprocessing 27 2.5. Statistical analyses 28 III Results 32 1. Study 1: Can gait variability predict the risk of cognitive decline in cognitively normal elderly? 33 1.1. Association of gait variability and gait speed status with the risk of MCI 34 2. Study 2: Shared Neural Substrates between Gait Variability-Cognitive Function 35 IV Discussion 38 [Figure 1] Risk of incident mild cognitive impairment over 4 years stratified by gait speed (a) and variability (b) by log-rank test 49 [Figure 2] Cortical thickness and gait variability in non-demented older adults 50 [Figure 3] Cortical thickness of LH1 cluster mediates effect of gait variability on CERAD-TS (a) and VMS (b) 51 [Table 1] Demographic, clinical, cognitive function, and gait characteristics of the subjects 52 [Table 2] Prediction of mild cognitive impairment in cognitively normal elderly individuals 54 [Table 3] Characteristics of participants 55 [Table 4] Vertex-Wise Analyses of Gait Variability and Cortical Thickness 56 [Table 5] Regression Analyses of Gait Variability and Cortical Thickness 57 [Table 6] Associations between Cortical Regions related with Gait Variability and Cognitive Function 58 Bibliography 59 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ธ€ 66 ์ดˆ ๋ก 67๋ฐ•

    Evaluation of home-based rehabilitation sensing systems with respect to standardised clinical tests

    Get PDF
    With increased demand for tele-rehabilitation, many autonomous home-based rehabilitation systems have appeared recently. Many of these systems, however, suffer from lack of patient acceptance and engagement or fail to provide satisfactory accuracy; both are needed for appropriate diagnostics. This paper first provides a detailed discussion of current sensor-based home-based rehabilitation systems with respect to four recently established criteria for wide acceptance and long engagement. A methodological procedure is then proposed for the evaluation of accuracy of portable sensing home-based rehabilitation systems, in line with medically-approved tests and recommendations. For experiments, we deploy an in-house low-cost sensing system meeting the four criteria of acceptance to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation methodology. We observe that the deployed sensor system has limitations in sensing fast movement. Indicators of enhanced motivation and engagement are recorded through the questionnaire responses with more than 83% of the respondents supporting the systemโ€™s motivation and engagement enhancement. The evaluation results demonstrate that the deployed system is fit for purpose with statistically significant ( ฯฑc>0.99 , R2>0.94 , ICC>0.96 ) and unbiased correlation to the golden standard

    Protocol for PD SENSORS:Parkinsonโ€™s Diseaseโ€ฏSymptom Evaluation in a Naturalistic Setting producing Outcomesโ€ฏmeasuResโ€ฏusing SPHERE technology. An observational feasibility study ofโ€ฏmulti-modal multi-sensor technologyโ€ฏtoโ€ฏmeasureโ€ฏsymptoms and activities of daily living in Parkinsonโ€™s disease

    Get PDF
    Introduction The impact of disease-modifying agents on disease progression in Parkinsonโ€™s disease is largely assessed in clinical trials using clinical rating scales. These scales have drawbacks in terms of their ability to capture the fluctuating nature of symptoms while living in a naturalistic environment. The SPHERE (Sensor Platform for HEalthcare in a Residential Environment) project has designed a multi-sensor platform with multimodal devices designed to allow continuous, relatively inexpensive, unobtrusive sensing of motor, non-motor and activities of daily living metrics in a home or a home-like environment. The aim of this study is to evaluate how the SPHERE technology can measure aspects of Parkinsonโ€™s disease.Methods and analysis This is a small-scale feasibility and acceptability study during which 12 pairs of participants (comprising a person with Parkinsonโ€™s and a healthy control participant) will stay and live freely for 5 days in a home-like environment embedded with SPHERE technology including environmental, appliance monitoring, wrist-worn accelerometry and camera sensors. These data will be collected alongside clinical rating scales, participant diary entries and expert clinician annotations of colour video images. Machine learning will be used to look for a signal to discriminate between Parkinsonโ€™s disease and control, and between Parkinsonโ€™s disease symptoms โ€˜onโ€™ and โ€˜offโ€™ medications. Additional outcome measures including bradykinesia, activity level, sleep parameters and some activities of daily living will be explored. Acceptability of the technology will be evaluated qualitatively using semi-structured interviews.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been given to commence this study; the results will be disseminated as widely as appropriate
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore