Neural mechanisms underlying interindividual differences in intergenerational sustainable behavior.

Intergenerational sustainability is a pressing challenge, which is exacerbated by the fact that the current generation must make sacrifices today to ensure the well-being of future generations. There are large interindividual differences in intergenerational sustainable behavior. However, the neural mechanisms underlying these interindividual differences have remained unexplored. Here, we combined fMRI with a consequential intergenerational sustainability paradigm in a sample of 72 healthy students. Specifically, we analyzed task-dependent functional activity and connectivity during intergenerational sustainable decision-making, focusing on the state-like neurophysiological processes giving rise to behavioral heterogeneity in sustainability. We found that differences in neural communication within and between the mentalizing (TPJ/DMPFC) and cognitive control (ACC/DLPFC) network are related to interindividual differences in intergenerational sustainable behavior. Specifically, the stronger the functional connectivity within and between these networks during decision-making, the more individuals behaved intergenerationally sustainably. Corroborated by mediation analyses, these findings suggest that differences in the engagement of perspective-taking and self-control processes underly interindividual differences in intergenerational sustainable behavior. By answering recent calls for leveraging behavioral and neuroscience for sustainability research, we hope to contribute to interdisciplinary efforts to advance the understanding of interindividual differences in intergenerational sustainability

Neurophysiological correlates underlying social behavioural adjustment of conformity

[eng] Conformity is the act of changing one’s behaviour to adjust to other human beings. It is a crucial social adaptation that happens when people cooperate, where one sacrifices their own perception, expectations, or beliefs to reach convergence with another person. The aim of the present study was to increase the understanding of the neurophysiological underpinnings regarding the social behavioural adjustment of conformity. We start by introducing cooperation and how it is ingrained in human behaviour. Then we explore the different processes that the brain requires for the social behavioural adjustment of conformity. To engage in this social adaptation, a person needs a self-referenced learning mechanism based on a predictive model that helps them track the prediction errors from unexpected events. Also, the brain uses its monitoring and control systems to encode different value functions used in action selection. The use of different learning models in neuroscience, such as reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, has been a success story identifying learning systems by means of the mapped activity of different regions in the brain. Importantly, experimental paradigms which has been used to study conformity have not been based in a social interaction setting and, hence, the results, cannot be used to explain an inherently social phenomenon. The main goal of the present thesis is to study the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the social behavioural adjustment of conformity and its modulation with repeated interaction. To reach this goal, we have first designed a new experimental task where conformity appears spontaneously between two persons and in a reiterative way. This design exposes learning acquisition processes, which require iterative loops, as well as other cognitive control mechanisms such as feedback processing, value-based decision making and attention. The first study shows that people who previously cooperate increase their level of convergence and report a significantly more satisfying overall experience. In addition, participants learning on their counterparts’ behaviour can be explained using a RL algorithm as opposed to when they do not have previously cooperated. In the second study, we have studied the event-related potentials (ERP) and oscillatory power underlying conformity. ERP results show different levels of cognitive engagement that are associated to distinct levels of conformity. Also, time-frequency analysis shows evidence in theta, alpha and beta related to different functions such as cognitive control, attention and, also, reward processing, supporting the idea that convergence between dyads acts as a social reward. Finally, in the third study, we explored the intra- and inter- oscillatory connectivity between electrodes related to behavioural convergence. In intra-brain oscillatory connectivity coherence, we have found two different dynamics related to attention and executive functions in alpha. Also, we have found that the learning about peer’s behaviour as computed using a RL is mediated by theta oscillatory connectivity. Consequently, combined evidence from Study 2 and Study 3 suggests that both cognitive control and learning computations happening in the social behavioural adaptation of conformity are signalled in theta frequency band. The present work is one of the first studies describing, with credible evidence, that conformity, when this occurs willingly and spontaneously rather than induced, engages different brain activity underlying reward-guided learning, cognitive control, and attention.[spa] La conformidad es el acto de cambiar el comportamiento de uno a favor de ajustarnos a otros seres humanos. Se trata de una adaptación crucial que ocurre cuando la gente coopera, donde uno sacrifica su propia percepción, expectativas o creencias en aras de conseguir una convergencia con la otra persona. El objetivo del presente estudio ha sido tratar de aportar a la comprensión de las estructuras neurofisiológicas que soportan un ajuste social como el de la conformidad. En la primera parte de esta tesis comenzamos hablando de la cooperación y lo profundamente arraigada que está en nuestro comportamiento. Más tarde exploramos diferentes procesos que el cerebro requiere en el ajuste social de la conformidad. Así pues, para involucrarse en esta adaptación social, una persona requiere de un mecanismo de aprendizaje auto-referenciado basado en un modelo predictivo que le ayude a seguir el rastro de los errores de predicción que acompañan a los eventos inesperados. Además, el cerebro usa sus sistemas de control y predicción para codificar diferentes funciones de valor usadas en la selección de acción. El uso de diferentes modelos de aprendizaje en neurociencia, como los algoritmos de aprendizaje por refuerzo (RL), han sido una historia de éxito a la hora de identificar los sistemas de aprendizaje a través del mapeo de la actividad de diferentes regiones del cerebro. Es importante destacar que los paradigmas experimentales que se han usado para estudiar la conformidad no se han basado en entornos de interacción social y que, por lo tanto, sus resultados no pueden usarse para explicar un fenómeno inherentemente social. El objetivo principal de la presente tesis es el estudio de los mecanismos neurofisiológicos que fundamentan el comportamiento de ajuste social de la conformidad y su modulación con la interacción repetida. Para alcanzar este objetivo, primero hemos diseñado una nueva tarea experimental en la que la conformidad aparece de forma espontánea entre dos personas y, además, de forma reiterativa. Este diseño permite exponer tanto los procesos de adquisición del aprendizaje, que requieren de ciclos iterativos, así como otros mecanismos de control cognitivo tales como el procesamiento de la retroalimentación, las tomas de decisiones basadas en procesos valorativos y la atención. El primer estudio nos muestra que la gente que coopera previamente incrementa sus niveles de convergencia y reportan significativamente una experiencia generalmente más satisfactoria en el experimento. Adicionalmente, un modelo de RL nos explica que los participantes tratan de aprender del comportamiento de sus parejas en mayor medida si estos han cooperado previamente. En el segundo estudio, hemos estudiado los potenciales relacionados con eventos (ERP) y el poder de las oscilaciones que sustentan la conformidad. Los estudios de ERP muestran diferentes niveles de implicación cognitiva asociados con diferentes niveles de conformidad. Además, los análisis de tiempo-frecuencia muestran evidencia en theta, alfa y beta relacionados con diferentes funciones como el control cognitivo, la atención, y, también, el procesamiento de la recompensa, apoyando la idea de que la convergencia entre díadas actúa como una recompensa social. Finalmente, en el tercer estudio, exploramos la conectividad oscilatoria intra e inter entre electrodos que se pudieran relacionar con la conducta de convergencia. A propósito de la conectividad oscilatoria coherente intra, hemos hallado dos dinámicas relacionadas con la atención y las funciones ejecutivas en alfa. Asimismo, hemos encontrado que el aprendizaje de la conducta de la pareja computada a través de RL está mediada a través de la conectividad oscilatoria de theta. Consecuentemente, la evidencia combinada entre el estudio 2 y el estudio 3 sugiere que conjuntamente el control cognitivo y las computaciones de aprendizaje que ocurren en la conducta de adaptación social de la conformidad están relacionadas con la actividad de la banda de frecuencia theta. Este trabajo constituye uno de los primeros estudios que describen, con evidencia creíble, que la conformidad, cuando ocurre voluntaria y espontáneamente a diferencia cuando esta es inducida, involucra actividad del cerebro que se fundamenta en el aprendizaje guiado por reforzamiento, el control cognitivo y la atención

Directional adposition use in English, Swedish and Finnish

Directional adpositions such as to the left of describe where a Figure is in relation to a Ground. English and Swedish directional adpositions refer to the location of a Figure in relation to a Ground, whether both are static or in motion. In contrast, the Finnish directional adpositions edellä (in front of) and jäljessä (behind) solely describe the location of a moving Figure in relation to a moving Ground (Nikanne, 2003). When using directional adpositions, a frame of reference must be assumed for interpreting the meaning of directional adpositions. For example, the meaning of to the left of in English can be based on a relative (speaker or listener based) reference frame or an intrinsic (object based) reference frame (Levinson, 1996). When a Figure and a Ground are both in motion, it is possible for a Figure to be described as being behind or in front of the Ground, even if neither have intrinsic features. As shown by Walker (in preparation), there are good reasons to assume that in the latter case a motion based reference frame is involved. This means that if Finnish speakers would use edellä (in front of) and jäljessä (behind) more frequently in situations where both the Figure and Ground are in motion, a difference in reference frame use between Finnish on one hand and English and Swedish on the other could be expected. We asked native English, Swedish and Finnish speakers’ to select adpositions from a language specific list to describe the location of a Figure relative to a Ground when both were shown to be moving on a computer screen. We were interested in any differences between Finnish, English and Swedish speakers. All languages showed a predominant use of directional spatial adpositions referring to the lexical concepts TO THE LEFT OF, TO THE RIGHT OF, ABOVE and BELOW. There were no differences between the languages in directional adpositions use or reference frame use, including reference frame use based on motion. We conclude that despite differences in the grammars of the languages involved, and potential differences in reference frame system use, the three languages investigated encode Figure location in relation to Ground location in a similar way when both are in motion. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslingiuistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M.F. Garrett (Eds.) Language and Space (pp.109-170). Massachusetts: MIT Press. Nikanne, U. (2003). How Finnish postpositions see the axis system. In E. van der Zee & J. Slack (Eds.), Representing direction in language and space. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Walker, C. (in preparation). Motion encoding in language, the use of spatial locatives in a motion context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lincoln, Lincoln. United Kingdo

Genetics and developmental biology of cooperation

Despite essential progress towards understanding the evolution of cooperative behaviour, we still lack detailed knowledge about its underlying molecular mechanisms, genetic basis, evolutionary dynamics and ontogeny. An international workshop "Genetics and Development of Cooperation," organized by the University of Bern (Switzerland), aimed at discussing the current progress in this research field and suggesting avenues for future research. This review uses the major themes of the meeting as a springboard to synthesize the concepts of genetic and nongenetic inheritance of cooperation, and to review a quantitative genetic framework that allows for the inclusion of indirect genetic effects. Furthermore, we argue that including nongenetic inheritance, such as transgenerational epigenetic effects, parental effects, ecological and cultural inheritance, provides a more nuanced view of the evolution of cooperation. We summarize those genes and molecular pathways in a range of species that seem promising candidates for mechanisms underlying cooperative behaviours. Concerning the neurobiological substrate of cooperation, we suggest three cognitive skills necessary for the ability to cooperate: (i) event memory, (ii) synchrony with others and (iii) responsiveness to others. Taking a closer look at the developmental trajectories that lead to the expression of cooperative behaviours, we discuss the dichotomy between early morphological specialization in social insects and more flexible behavioural specialization in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Finally, we provide recommendations for which biological systems and species may be particularly suitable, which specific traits and parameters should be measured, what type of approaches should be followed, and which methods should be employed in studies of cooperation to better understand how cooperation evolves and manifests in nature

Modelling relationship quality across organizational cultures : an empirical investigation within the logistics outsourcing industry

Relationship quality is the cornerstone of relationship marketing. However, conceptualizations of relationship quality vary across studies indicating the absence of a general consensus. Consistent with the definition of Hennig-Thurau et al. (2002, p. 234), relationship quality most often refers to ―a metaconstruct composed of several key components reflecting the overall nature of relationships between companies and consumers‖. However, ―the only area of convergence is three major dimensions of RQ [relationship quality] (trust, commitment and satisfaction)‖ (Athanasopoulou, 2009, p. 603). This assumption is at odds with a growing body of research which calls to ―expand the constructs and determine which aspects or dimensions should be included to obtain a multifaceted view of relational exchanges‖ (Palmatier et al., 2006, p. 152). Moreover, there is a consensus that culture affects business relationships. Yet, to date, both the phenomena are under-researched. Owing to the fragmented insights into relationship quality and its links with organizational culture, calls for future research gather momentum each day. This thesis forwards a study of relationship quality across organizational cultures. Consequently, the objective of the current study is to conceptualize rival models by amalgamating extant literature stemming from diverse theories in order to empirically corroborate (1) the dimensions of relationship quality, (2) the structural relationships between them and (3) the effects of organizational culture on relationship quality. In doing so, the current study constitutes the first attempt to evaluate the direct and moderating effects of organizational culture on relationship quality in a holistic manner. Extensive synthesis of extant literature stemming from different theories reveals six dimensions of relationship quality: loyalty, reciprocity, co-operation, communication, trust and opportunism. Further synthesis of the literature identifies five dimensions or organizational culture relevant to relationship quality: individualism and collectivism, human orientation, power distance, assertiveness and uncertainty avoidance. Owing to the absence of a general consensus, two competing models of relationship quality are conceptualized. A web-based survey was employed to collect data within the logistics outsourcing industry in the United Kingdom. This process resulted in two hundred and sixty six usable responses. Subsequently, structural equation modelling was employed to test the hypotheses of interest. The findings demonstrate that the construct of relationship quality comprises five dimensions: action loyalty, reciprocity, co-operation, trust and opportunism. Moreover, four dimensions of organizational culture appear to have effects on relationship quality: individualism and collectivism, human orientation, power distance and assertiveness. The findings result in numerous theoretical contributions and practical implications