4,928 research outputs found

    Uniform rationality of Poincar\'e series of p-adic equivalence relations and Igusa's conjecture on exponential sums

    Full text link
    This thesis contains some new results on the uniform rationality of Poincar\'e series of p-adic equivalence relations and Igusa's conjecture on exponential sumsComment: Doctoral thesis, University of Lill

    Exponential sums and polynomial congruences in two variables: the quasi-homogeneous case

    Get PDF
    We adapt ideas of Phong, Stein and Sturm and ideas of Ikromov and M\"uller from the continuous setting to various discrete settings, obtaining sharp bounds for exponential sums and the number of solutions to polynomial congruences for general quasi-homogeneous polynomials in two variables. This extends work of Denef and Sperber and also Cluckers regarding a conjecture of Igusa in the two dimensional setting by no longer requiring the polynomial to be nondegenerate with respect to its Newton diagram

    Products of Differences over Arbitrary Finite Fields

    Full text link
    There exists an absolute constant Ξ΄>0\delta > 0 such that for all qq and all subsets AβŠ†FqA \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q of the finite field with qq elements, if ∣A∣>q2/3βˆ’Ξ΄|A| > q^{2/3 - \delta}, then ∣(Aβˆ’A)(Aβˆ’A)∣=∣{(aβˆ’b)(cβˆ’d):a,b,c,d∈A}∣>q2. |(A-A)(A-A)| = |\{ (a -b) (c-d) : a,b,c,d \in A\}| > \frac{q}{2}. Any Ξ΄<1/13,542\delta < 1/13,542 suffices for sufficiently large qq. This improves the condition ∣A∣>q2/3|A| > q^{2/3}, due to Bennett, Hart, Iosevich, Pakianathan, and Rudnev, that is typical for such questions. Our proof is based on a qualitatively optimal characterisation of sets A,XβŠ†FqA,X \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q for which the number of solutions to the equation (a1βˆ’a2)=x(a3βˆ’a4) ,β€…β€Ša1,a2,a3,a4∈A,x∈X (a_1-a_2) = x (a_3-a_4) \, , \; a_1,a_2, a_3, a_4 \in A, x \in X is nearly maximum. A key ingredient is determining exact algebraic structure of sets A,XA, X for which ∣A+XA∣|A + XA| is nearly minimum, which refines a result of Bourgain and Glibichuk using work of Gill, Helfgott, and Tao. We also prove a stronger statement for (Aβˆ’B)(Cβˆ’D)={(aβˆ’b)(cβˆ’d):a∈A,b∈B,c∈C,d∈D} (A-B)(C-D) = \{ (a -b) (c-d) : a \in A, b \in B, c \in C, d \in D\} when A,B,C,DA,B,C,D are sets in a prime field, generalising a result of Roche-Newton, Rudnev, Shkredov, and the authors.Comment: 42 page
    • …
    corecore