379 research outputs found

    Deterministic Distributed Edge-Coloring via Hypergraph Maximal Matching

    Full text link
    We present a deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a (2Δ1)(2\Delta-1)-edge-coloring, or even list-edge-coloring, in any nn-node graph with maximum degree Δ\Delta, in O(log7Δlogn)O(\log^7 \Delta \log n) rounds. This answers one of the long-standing open questions of \emph{distributed graph algorithms} from the late 1980s, which asked for a polylogarithmic-time algorithm. See, e.g., Open Problem 4 in the Distributed Graph Coloring book of Barenboim and Elkin. The previous best round complexities were 2O(logn)2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})} by Panconesi and Srinivasan [STOC'92] and O~(Δ)+O(logn)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\Delta}) + O(\log^* n) by Fraigniaud, Heinrich, and Kosowski [FOCS'16]. A corollary of our deterministic list-edge-coloring also improves the randomized complexity of (2Δ1)(2\Delta-1)-edge-coloring to poly(loglogn)(\log\log n) rounds. The key technical ingredient is a deterministic distributed algorithm for \emph{hypergraph maximal matching}, which we believe will be of interest beyond this result. In any hypergraph of rank rr --- where each hyperedge has at most rr vertices --- with nn nodes and maximum degree Δ\Delta, this algorithm computes a maximal matching in O(r5log6+logrΔlogn)O(r^5 \log^{6+\log r } \Delta \log n) rounds. This hypergraph matching algorithm and its extensions lead to a number of other results. In particular, a polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed maximal independent set algorithm for graphs with bounded neighborhood independence, hence answering Open Problem 5 of Barenboim and Elkin's book, a ((logΔ/ε)O(log(1/ε)))((\log \Delta/\varepsilon)^{O(\log (1/\varepsilon))})-round deterministic algorithm for (1+ε)(1+\varepsilon)-approximation of maximum matching, and a quasi-polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed algorithm for orienting λ\lambda-arboricity graphs with out-degree at most (1+ε)λ(1+\varepsilon)\lambda, for any constant ε>0\varepsilon>0, hence partially answering Open Problem 10 of Barenboim and Elkin's book

    Hamiltonicity and σ\sigma-hypergraphs

    Get PDF
    We define and study a special type of hypergraph. A σ\sigma-hypergraph H=H(n,r,qH= H(n,r,q \mid σ\sigma), where σ\sigma is a partition of rr, is an rr-uniform hypergraph having nqnq vertices partitioned into n n classes of qq vertices each. If the classes are denoted by V1V_1, V2V_2,...,VnV_n, then a subset KK of V(H)V(H) of size rr is an edge if the partition of rr formed by the non-zero cardinalities \mid KK \cap ViV_i \mid, 1in 1 \leq i \leq n, is σ\sigma. The non-empty intersections KK \cap ViV_i are called the parts of KK, and s(σ)s(\sigma) denotes the number of parts. We consider various types of cycles in hypergraphs such as Berge cycles and sharp cycles in which only consecutive edges have a nonempty intersection. We show that most σ\sigma-hypergraphs contain a Hamiltonian Berge cycle and that, for ns+1n \geq s+1 and qr(r1)q \geq r(r-1), a σ\sigma-hypergraph HH always contains a sharp Hamiltonian cycle. We also extend this result to kk-intersecting cycles

    Submodular Maximization Meets Streaming: Matchings, Matroids, and More

    Full text link
    We study the problem of finding a maximum matching in a graph given by an input stream listing its edges in some arbitrary order, where the quantity to be maximized is given by a monotone submodular function on subsets of edges. This problem, which we call maximum submodular-function matching (MSM), is a natural generalization of maximum weight matching (MWM), which is in turn a generalization of maximum cardinality matching (MCM). We give two incomparable algorithms for this problem with space usage falling in the semi-streaming range---they store only O(n)O(n) edges, using O(nlogn)O(n\log n) working memory---that achieve approximation ratios of 7.757.75 in a single pass and (3+ϵ)(3+\epsilon) in O(ϵ3)O(\epsilon^{-3}) passes respectively. The operations of these algorithms mimic those of Zelke's and McGregor's respective algorithms for MWM; the novelty lies in the analysis for the MSM setting. In fact we identify a general framework for MWM algorithms that allows this kind of adaptation to the broader setting of MSM. In the sequel, we give generalizations of these results where the maximization is over "independent sets" in a very general sense. This generalization captures hypermatchings in hypergraphs as well as independence in the intersection of multiple matroids.Comment: 18 page

    Learning from networked examples

    Get PDF
    Many machine learning algorithms are based on the assumption that training examples are drawn independently. However, this assumption does not hold anymore when learning from a networked sample because two or more training examples may share some common objects, and hence share the features of these shared objects. We show that the classic approach of ignoring this problem potentially can have a harmful effect on the accuracy of statistics, and then consider alternatives. One of these is to only use independent examples, discarding other information. However, this is clearly suboptimal. We analyze sample error bounds in this networked setting, providing significantly improved results. An important component of our approach is formed by efficient sample weighting schemes, which leads to novel concentration inequalities

    Counting hypergraph matchings up to uniqueness threshold

    Get PDF
    We study the problem of approximately counting matchings in hypergraphs of bounded maximum degree and maximum size of hyperedges. With an activity parameter λ\lambda, each matching MM is assigned a weight λM\lambda^{|M|}. The counting problem is formulated as computing a partition function that gives the sum of the weights of all matchings in a hypergraph. This problem unifies two extensively studied statistical physics models in approximate counting: the hardcore model (graph independent sets) and the monomer-dimer model (graph matchings). For this model, the critical activity λc=ddk(d1)d+1\lambda_c= \frac{d^d}{k (d-1)^{d+1}} is the threshold for the uniqueness of Gibbs measures on the infinite (d+1)(d+1)-uniform (k+1)(k+1)-regular hypertree. Consider hypergraphs of maximum degree at most k+1k+1 and maximum size of hyperedges at most d+1d+1. We show that when λ<λc\lambda < \lambda_c, there is an FPTAS for computing the partition function; and when λ=λc\lambda = \lambda_c, there is a PTAS for computing the log-partition function. These algorithms are based on the decay of correlation (strong spatial mixing) property of Gibbs distributions. When λ>2λc\lambda > 2\lambda_c, there is no PRAS for the partition function or the log-partition function unless NP==RP. Towards obtaining a sharp transition of computational complexity of approximate counting, we study the local convergence from a sequence of finite hypergraphs to the infinite lattice with specified symmetry. We show a surprising connection between the local convergence and the reversibility of a natural random walk. This leads us to a barrier for the hardness result: The non-uniqueness of infinite Gibbs measure is not realizable by any finite gadgets
    corecore