705 research outputs found

    Toward an automaton Constraint for Local Search

    Full text link
    We explore the idea of using finite automata to implement new constraints for local search (this is already a successful technique in constraint-based global search). We show how it is possible to maintain incrementally the violations of a constraint and its decision variables from an automaton that describes a ground checker for that constraint. We establish the practicality of our approach idea on real-life personnel rostering problems, and show that it is competitive with the approach of [Pralong, 2007]

    On minimizing deterministic tree automata

    Get PDF
    We present two algorithms for minimizing deterministic frontier-to-root tree automata (dfrtas) and compare them with their string counterparts. The presentation is incremental, starting out from definitions of minimality of automata and state equivalence, in the style of earlier algorithm taxonomies by the authors. The first algorithm is the classical one, initially presented by Brainerd in the 1960s and presented (sometimes imprecisely) in standard texts on tree language theory ever since. The second algorithm is completely new. This algorithm, essentially representing the generalization to ranked trees of the string algorithm presented by Watson and Daciuk, incrementally minimizes a dfrta. As a result, intermediate results of the algorithm can be used to reduce the initial automaton’s size. This makes the algorithm useful in situations where running time is restricted (for example, in real-time applications). We also briefly sketch how a concurrent specification of the algorithm in CSP can be obtained from an existing specification for the dfa case

    On minimizing deterministic tree automata

    Get PDF
    We present two algorithms for minimizing deterministic frontier-to-root tree automata (dfrtas) and compare them with their string counterparts. The presentation is incremental, starting out from definitions of minimality of automata and state equivalence, in the style of earlier algorithm taxonomies by the authors. The first algorithm is the classical one, initially presented by Brainerd in the 1960s and presented (sometimes imprecisely) in standard texts on tree language theory ever since. The second algorithm is completely new. This algorithm, essentially representing the generalization to ranked trees of the string algorithm presented by Watson and Daciuk, incrementally minimizes a dfrta. As a result, intermediate results of the algorithm can be used to reduce the initial automaton’s size. This makes the algorithm useful in situations where running time is restricted (for example, in real-time applications). We also briefly sketch how a concurrent specification of the algorithm in CSP can be obtained from an existing specification for the dfa case

    Efficient Implementation for Deterministic Finite Tree Automata Minimization

    Full text link

    Quick Subset Construction

    Get PDF
    A finite automaton can be either deterministic (DFA) or nondeterministic (NFA). An automaton-based task is in general more efficient when performed with a DFA rather than an NFA. For any NFA there is an equivalent DFA that can be generated by the classical Subset Construction algorithm. When, however, a large NFA may be transformed into an equivalent DFA by a series of actions operating directly on the NFA, Subset Construction may be unnecessarily expensive in computation, as a (possibly large) deterministic portion of the NFA is regenerated as is, a waste of processing. This is why a conservative algorithm for NFA determinization is proposed, called Quick Subset Construction, which progressively transforms an NFA into an equivalent DFA instead of generating the DFA from scratch, thereby avoiding unnecessary processing. Quick Subset Construction is proven, both formally and empirically, to be equivalent to Subset Construction, inasmuch it generates exactly the same DFA. Experimental results indicate that, the smaller the number of repair actions performed on the NFA, as compared to the size of the equivalent DFA, the faster Quick Subset Construction over Subset Construction

    Regular Languages meet Prefix Sorting

    Full text link
    Indexing strings via prefix (or suffix) sorting is, arguably, one of the most successful algorithmic techniques developed in the last decades. Can indexing be extended to languages? The main contribution of this paper is to initiate the study of the sub-class of regular languages accepted by an automaton whose states can be prefix-sorted. Starting from the recent notion of Wheeler graph [Gagie et al., TCS 2017]-which extends naturally the concept of prefix sorting to labeled graphs-we investigate the properties of Wheeler languages, that is, regular languages admitting an accepting Wheeler finite automaton. Interestingly, we characterize this family as the natural extension of regular languages endowed with the co-lexicographic ordering: when sorted, the strings belonging to a Wheeler language are partitioned into a finite number of co-lexicographic intervals, each formed by elements from a single Myhill-Nerode equivalence class. Moreover: (i) We show that every Wheeler NFA (WNFA) with nn states admits an equivalent Wheeler DFA (WDFA) with at most 2n1Σ2n-1-|\Sigma| states that can be computed in O(n3)O(n^3) time. This is in sharp contrast with general NFAs. (ii) We describe a quadratic algorithm to prefix-sort a proper superset of the WDFAs, a O(nlogn)O(n\log n)-time online algorithm to sort acyclic WDFAs, and an optimal linear-time offline algorithm to sort general WDFAs. By contribution (i), our algorithms can also be used to index any WNFA at the moderate price of doubling the automaton's size. (iii) We provide a minimization theorem that characterizes the smallest WDFA recognizing the same language of any input WDFA. The corresponding constructive algorithm runs in optimal linear time in the acyclic case, and in O(nlogn)O(n\log n) time in the general case. (iv) We show how to compute the smallest WDFA equivalent to any acyclic DFA in nearly-optimal time.Comment: added minimization theorems; uploaded submitted version; New version with new results (W-MH theorem, linear determinization), added author: Giovanna D'Agostin
    corecore