In vivo estimation of target registration errors during augmented reality laparoscopic surgery

PURPOSE: Successful use of augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery requires that the surgeon has a thorough understanding of the likely accuracy of any overlay. Whilst the accuracy of such systems can be estimated in the laboratory, it is difficult to extend such methods to the in vivo clinical setting. Herein we describe a novel method that enables the surgeon to estimate in vivo errors during use. We show that the method enables quantitative evaluation of in vivo data gathered with the SmartLiver image guidance system. METHODS: The SmartLiver system utilises an intuitive display to enable the surgeon to compare the positions of landmarks visible in both a projected model and in the live video stream. From this the surgeon can estimate the system accuracy when using the system to locate subsurface targets not visible in the live video. Visible landmarks may be either point or line features. We test the validity of the algorithm using an anatomically representative liver phantom, applying simulated perturbations to achieve clinically realistic overlay errors. We then apply the algorithm to in vivo data. RESULTS: The phantom results show that using projected errors of surface features provides a reliable predictor of subsurface target registration error for a representative human liver shape. Applying the algorithm to in vivo data gathered with the SmartLiver image-guided surgery system shows that the system is capable of accuracies around 12 mm; however, achieving this reliably remains a significant challenge. CONCLUSION: We present an in vivo quantitative evaluation of the SmartLiver image-guided surgery system, together with a validation of the evaluation algorithm. This is the first quantitative in vivo analysis of an augmented reality system for laparoscopic surgery

Optical techniques for 3D surface reconstruction in computer-assisted laparoscopic surgery

One of the main challenges for computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is to determine the intra-opera- tive morphology and motion of soft-tissues. This information is prerequisite to the registration of multi-modal patient-specific data for enhancing the surgeon’s navigation capabilites by observ- ing beyond exposed tissue surfaces and for providing intelligent control of robotic-assisted in- struments. In minimally invasive surgery (MIS), optical techniques are an increasingly attractive approach for in vivo 3D reconstruction of the soft-tissue surface geometry. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art methods for optical intra-operative 3D reconstruction in laparoscopic surgery and discusses the technical challenges and future perspectives towards clinical translation. With the recent paradigm shift of surgical practice towards MIS and new developments in 3D opti- cal imaging, this is a timely discussion about technologies that could facilitate complex CAS procedures in dynamic and deformable anatomical regions

Automatic registration of 3D models to laparoscopic video images for guidance during liver surgery

Laparoscopic liver interventions offer significant advantages over open surgery, such as less pain and trauma, and shorter recovery time for the patient. However, they also bring challenges for the surgeons such as the lack of tactile feedback, limited field of view and occluded anatomy. Augmented reality (AR) can potentially help during laparoscopic liver interventions by displaying sub-surface structures (such as tumours or vasculature). The initial registration between the 3D model extracted from the CT scan and the laparoscopic video feed is essential for an AR system which should be efficient, robust, intuitive to use and with minimal disruption to the surgical procedure. Several challenges of registration methods in laparoscopic interventions include the deformation of the liver due to gas insufflation in the abdomen, partial visibility of the organ and lack of prominent geometrical or texture-wise landmarks. These challenges are discussed in detail and an overview of the state of the art is provided. This research project aims to provide the tools to move towards a completely automatic registration. Firstly, the importance of pre-operative planning is discussed along with the characteristics of the liver that can be used in order to constrain a registration method. Secondly, maximising the amount of information obtained before the surgery, a semi-automatic surface based method is proposed to recover the initial rigid registration irrespective of the position of the shapes. Finally, a fully automatic 3D-2D rigid global registration is proposed which estimates a global alignment of the pre-operative 3D model using a single intra-operative image. Moving towards incorporating the different liver contours can help constrain the registration, especially for partial surfaces. Having a robust, efficient AR system which requires no manual interaction from the surgeon will aid in the translation of such approaches to the clinics

Non-Rigid Liver Registration for Laparoscopy using Data-Driven Biomechanical Models

During laparoscopic liver resection, the limited access to the organ, the small field of view and lack of palpation can obstruct a surgeon’s workflow. Automatic navigation systems could use the images from preoperative volumetric organ scans to help the surgeons find their target (tumors) and risk-structures (vessels) more efficiently. This requires the preoperative data to be fused (or registered) with the intraoperative scene in order to display information at the correct intraoperative position. One key challenge in this setting is the automatic estimation of the organ’s current intra-operative deformation, which is required in order to predict the position of internal structures. Parameterizing the many patient-specific unknowns (tissue properties, boundary conditions, interactions with other tissues, direction of gravity) is very difficult. Instead, this work explores how to employ deep neural networks to solve the registration problem in a data-driven manner. To this end, convolutional neural networks are trained on synthetic data to estimate an organ’s intraoperative displacement field and thus its current deformation. To drive this estimation, visible surface cues from the intraoperative camera view must be supplied to the networks. Since reliable surface features are very difficult to find, the networks are adapted to also find correspondences between the pre- and intraoperative liver geometry automatically. This combines the search for correspondences with the biomechanical behavior estimation and allows the networks to tackle the full non-rigid registration problem in one single step. The result is a model which can quickly predict the volume deformation of a liver, given only sparse surface information. The model combines the advantages of a physically accurate biomechanical simulation with the speed and powerful feature extraction capabilities of deep neural networks. To test the method intraoperatively, a registration pipeline is developed which constructs a map of the liver and its surroundings from the laparoscopic video and then uses the neural networks to fuse the preoperative volume data into this map. The deformed organ volume can then be rendered as an overlay directly onto the laparoscopic video stream. The focus of this pipeline is to be applicable to real surgery, where everything should be quick and non-intrusive. To meet these requirements, a SLAM system is used to localize the laparoscopic camera (avoiding setup of an external tracking system), various neural networks are used to quickly interpret the scene and semi-automatic tools let the surgeons guide the system. Beyond the concrete advantages of the data-driven approach for intraoperative registration, this work also demonstrates general benefits of training a registration system preoperatively on synthetic data. The method lets the engineer decide which values need to be known explicitly and which should be estimated implicitly by the networks, which opens the door to many new possibilities.:1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation 1.1.1 Navigated Liver Surgery 1.1.2 Laparoscopic Liver Registration 1.2 Challenges in Laparoscopic Liver Registration 1.2.1 Preoperative Model 1.2.2 Intraoperative Data 1.2.3 Fusion/Registration 1.2.4 Data 1.3 Scope and Goals of this Work 1.3.1 Data-Driven, Biomechanical Model 1.3.2 Data-Driven Non-Rigid Registration 1.3.3 Building a Working Prototype 2 State of the Art 2.1 Rigid Registration 2.2 Non-Rigid Liver Registration 2.3 Neural Networks for Simulation and Registration 3 Theoretical Background 3.1 Liver 3.2 Laparoscopic Liver Resection 3.2.1 Staging Procedure 3.3 Biomechanical Simulation 3.3.1 Physical Balance Principles 3.3.2 Material Models 3.3.3 Numerical Solver: The Finite Element Method (FEM) 3.3.4 The Lagrangian Specification 3.4 Variables and Data in Liver Registration 3.4.1 Observable 3.4.2 Unknowns 4 Generating Simulations of Deforming Organs 4.1 Organ Volume 4.2 Forces and Boundary Conditions 4.2.1 Surface Forces 4.2.2 Zero-Displacement Boundary Conditions 4.2.3 Surrounding Tissues and Ligaments 4.2.4 Gravity 4.2.5 Pressure 4.3 Simulation 4.3.1 Static Simulation 4.3.2 Dynamic Simulation 4.4 Surface Extraction 4.4.1 Partial Surface Extraction 4.4.2 Surface Noise 4.4.3 Partial Surface Displacement 4.5 Voxelization 4.5.1 Voxelizing the Liver Geometry 4.5.2 Voxelizing the Displacement Field 4.5.3 Voxelizing Boundary Conditions 4.6 Pruning Dataset - Removing Unwanted Results 4.7 Data Augmentation 5 Deep Neural Networks for Biomechanical Simulation 5.1 Training Data 5.2 Network Architecture 5.3 Loss Functions and Training 6 Deep Neural Networks for Non-Rigid Registration 6.1 Training Data 6.2 Architecture 6.3 Loss 6.4 Training 6.5 Mesh Deformation 6.6 Example Application 7 Intraoperative Prototype 7.1 Image Acquisition 7.2 Stereo Calibration 7.3 Image Rectification, Disparity- and Depth- estimation 7.4 Liver Segmentation 7.4.1 Synthetic Image Generation 7.4.2 Automatic Segmentation 7.4.3 Manual Segmentation Modifier 7.5 SLAM 7.6 Dense Reconstruction 7.7 Rigid Registration 7.8 Non-Rigid Registration 7.9 Rendering 7.10 Robotic Operating System 8 Evaluation 8.1 Evaluation Datasets 8.1.1 In-Silico 8.1.2 Phantom Torso and Liver 8.1.3 In-Vivo, Human, Breathing Motion 8.1.4 In-Vivo, Human, Laparoscopy 8.2 Metrics 8.2.1 Mean Displacement Error 8.2.2 Target Registration Error (TRE) 8.2.3 Champfer Distance 8.2.4 Volumetric Change 8.3 Evaluation of the Synthetic Training Data 8.4 Data-Driven Biomechanical Model (DDBM) 8.4.1 Amount of Intraoperative Surface 8.4.2 Dynamic Simulation 8.5 Volume to Surface Registration Network (V2S-Net) 8.5.1 Amount of Intraoperative Surface 8.5.2 Dependency on Initial Rigid Alignment 8.5.3 Registration Accuracy in Comparison to Surface Noise 8.5.4 Registration Accuracy in Comparison to Material Stiffness 8.5.5 Champfer-Distance vs. Mean Displacement Error 8.5.6 In-vivo, Human Breathing Motion 8.6 Full Intraoperative Pipeline 8.6.1 Intraoperative Reconstruction: SLAM and Intraoperative Map 8.6.2 Full Pipeline on Laparoscopic Human Data 8.7 Timing 9 Discussion 9.1 Intraoperative Model 9.2 Physical Accuracy 9.3 Limitations in Training Data 9.4 Limitations Caused by Difference in Pre- and Intraoperative Modalities 9.5 Ambiguity 9.6 Intraoperative Prototype 10 Conclusion 11 List of Publications List of Figures Bibliograph

The value of Augmented Reality in surgery — A usability study on laparoscopic liver surgery

Augmented Reality (AR) is considered to be a promising technology for the guidance of laparoscopic liver surgery. By overlaying pre-operative 3D information of the liver and internal blood vessels on the laparoscopic view, surgeons can better understand the location of critical structures. In an effort to enable AR, several authors have focused on the development of methods to obtain an accurate alignment between the laparoscopic video image and the pre-operative 3D data of the liver, without assessing the benefit that the resulting overlay can provide during surgery. In this paper, we present a study that aims to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the value of an AR overlay in laparoscopic surgery during a simulated surgical task on a phantom setup. We design a study where participants are asked to physically localise pre-operative tumours in a liver phantom using three image guidance conditions — a baseline condition without any image guidance, a condition where the 3D surfaces of the liver are aligned to the video and displayed on a black background, and a condition where video see-through AR is displayed on the laparoscopic video. Using data collected from a cohort of 24 participants which include 12 surgeons, we observe that compared to the baseline, AR decreases the median localisation error of surgeons on non-peripheral targets from 25.8 mm to 9.2 mm. Using subjective feedback, we also identify that AR introduces usability improvements in the surgical task and increases the perceived confidence of the users. Between the two tested displays, the majority of participants preferred to use the AR overlay instead of navigated view of the 3D surfaces on a separate screen. We conclude that AR has the potential to improve performance and decision making in laparoscopic surgery, and that improvements in overlay alignment accuracy and depth perception should be pursued in the future

Augmented Reality in Kidney Cancer

Augmented reality(AR) is the concept of a digitally created perception that enhances components of the real-world to allow better engagement with it. Within healthcare, there has been a recent expansion of AR solutions, especially in the field of surgery. Traditional renal cancer surgery has been largely replaced by minimally invasive laparoscopic (or robotic) partial nephrectomies. This has meant loss of certain intra-operative experiences such as haptic feedback and AR can aid this replacement with enhanced visual and patient-specific feedback. The kidney is a dynamic organ and current AR development has revolved around specific surgical stages such as safe arterial clamping and perfecting tumour margins. This chapter discusses the current state of AR technology in these areas with key attention to the aspects of image registration, organ tracking, tissue deformation and live imaging. The chapter then discusses limitations of AR, such as intentional blindness and depth perception and provides potential future ideas and solutions. These include inventions such as AR headsets and 3D-printed renal models (with the possibility of remote surgical intervention). AR provides a very positive outcome for the future of truly minimally invasive renal surgery. However, current AR needs validation, cost evaluation and thorough planning before being safely integrated into everyday surgical practice

Performance of image guided navigation in laparoscopic liver surgery – A systematic review

Background: Compared to open surgery, minimally invasive liver resection has improved short term outcomes. It is however technically more challenging. Navigated image guidance systems (IGS) are being developed to overcome these challenges. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of their current capabilities and limitations. Methods: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched using free text terms and corresponding controlled vocabulary. Titles and abstracts of retrieved articles were screened for inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the retrieved data it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis. Therefore results are presented in tabulated and narrative format. Results: Out of 2015 articles, 17 pre-clinical and 33 clinical papers met inclusion criteria. Data from 24 articles that reported on accuracy indicates that in recent years navigation accuracy has been in the range of 8–15 mm. Due to discrepancies in evaluation methods it is difficult to compare accuracy metrics between different systems. Surgeon feedback suggests that current state of the art IGS may be useful as a supplementary navigation tool, especially in small liver lesions that are difficult to locate. They are however not able to reliably localise all relevant anatomical structures. Only one article investigated IGS impact on clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Further improvements in navigation accuracy are needed to enable reliable visualisation of tumour margins with the precision required for oncological resections. To enhance comparability between different IGS it is crucial to find a consensus on the assessment of navigation accuracy as a minimum reporting standard