5,677 research outputs found
2-factors with k cycles in Hamiltonian graphs
A well known generalisation of Dirac's theorem states that if a graph on
vertices has minimum degree at least then contains a
-factor consisting of exactly cycles. This is easily seen to be tight in
terms of the bound on the minimum degree. However, if one assumes in addition
that is Hamiltonian it has been conjectured that the bound on the minimum
degree may be relaxed. This was indeed shown to be true by S\'ark\"ozy. In
subsequent papers, the minimum degree bound has been improved, most recently to
by DeBiasio, Ferrara, and Morris. On the other hand no
lower bounds close to this are known, and all papers on this topic ask whether
the minimum degree needs to be linear. We answer this question, by showing that
the required minimum degree for large Hamiltonian graphs to have a -factor
consisting of a fixed number of cycles is sublinear in Comment: 13 pages, 6 picture
Hamilton cycles in graphs and hypergraphs: an extremal perspective
As one of the most fundamental and well-known NP-complete problems, the
Hamilton cycle problem has been the subject of intensive research. Recent
developments in the area have highlighted the crucial role played by the
notions of expansion and quasi-randomness. These concepts and other recent
techniques have led to the solution of several long-standing problems in the
area. New aspects have also emerged, such as resilience, robustness and the
study of Hamilton cycles in hypergraphs. We survey these developments and
highlight open problems, with an emphasis on extremal and probabilistic
approaches.Comment: to appear in the Proceedings of the ICM 2014; due to given page
limits, this final version is slightly shorter than the previous arxiv
versio
On some intriguing problems in Hamiltonian graph theory -- A survey
We survey results and open problems in Hamiltonian graph theory centred around three themes: regular graphs, -tough graphs, and claw-free graphs
Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs
What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph
H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's
theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect
matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all
the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a
(small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs
G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it
makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a
perfect F-packing.
The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy
and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and
quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have
been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress
(with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree
embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved
A Tight Lower Bound for Counting Hamiltonian Cycles via Matrix Rank
For even , the matchings connectivity matrix encodes which
pairs of perfect matchings on vertices form a single cycle. Cygan et al.
(STOC 2013) showed that the rank of over is
and used this to give an
time algorithm for counting Hamiltonian cycles modulo on graphs of
pathwidth . The same authors complemented their algorithm by an
essentially tight lower bound under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis
(SETH). This bound crucially relied on a large permutation submatrix within
, which enabled a "pattern propagation" commonly used in previous
related lower bounds, as initiated by Lokshtanov et al. (SODA 2011).
We present a new technique for a similar pattern propagation when only a
black-box lower bound on the asymptotic rank of is given; no
stronger structural insights such as the existence of large permutation
submatrices in are needed. Given appropriate rank bounds, our
technique yields lower bounds for counting Hamiltonian cycles (also modulo
fixed primes ) parameterized by pathwidth.
To apply this technique, we prove that the rank of over the
rationals is . We also show that the rank of
over is for any prime
and even for some primes.
As a consequence, we obtain that Hamiltonian cycles cannot be counted in time
for any unless SETH fails. This
bound is tight due to a time algorithm by Bodlaender et
al. (ICALP 2013). Under SETH, we also obtain that Hamiltonian cycles cannot be
counted modulo primes in time , indicating
that the modulus can affect the complexity in intricate ways.Comment: improved lower bounds modulo primes, improved figures, to appear in
SODA 201
- …