Parallel processing and expert systems

Whether it be monitoring the thermal subsystem of Space Station Freedom, or controlling the navigation of the autonomous rover on Mars, NASA missions in the 1990s cannot enjoy an increased level of autonomy without the efficient implementation of expert systems. Merely increasing the computational speed of uniprocessors may not be able to guarantee that real-time demands are met for larger systems. Speedup via parallel processing must be pursued alongside the optimization of sequential implementations. Prototypes of parallel expert systems have been built at universities and industrial laboratories in the U.S. and Japan. The state-of-the-art research in progress related to parallel execution of expert systems is surveyed. The survey discusses multiprocessors for expert systems, parallel languages for symbolic computations, and mapping expert systems to multiprocessors. Results to date indicate that the parallelism achieved for these systems is small. The main reasons are (1) the body of knowledge applicable in any given situation and the amount of computation executed by each rule firing are small, (2) dividing the problem solving process into relatively independent partitions is difficult, and (3) implementation decisions that enable expert systems to be incrementally refined hamper compile-time optimization. In order to obtain greater speedups, data parallelism and application parallelism must be exploited

Lock-free Concurrent Data Structures

Concurrent data structures are the data sharing side of parallel programming. Data structures give the means to the program to store data, but also provide operations to the program to access and manipulate these data. These operations are implemented through algorithms that have to be efficient. In the sequential setting, data structures are crucially important for the performance of the respective computation. In the parallel programming setting, their importance becomes more crucial because of the increased use of data and resource sharing for utilizing parallelism. The first and main goal of this chapter is to provide a sufficient background and intuition to help the interested reader to navigate in the complex research area of lock-free data structures. The second goal is to offer the programmer familiarity to the subject that will allow her to use truly concurrent methods.Comment: To appear in "Programming Multi-core and Many-core Computing Systems", eds. S. Pllana and F. Xhafa, Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computin

Parallel processing and expert systems

Whether it be monitoring the thermal subsystem of Space Station Freedom, or controlling the navigation of the autonomous rover on Mars, NASA missions in the 90's cannot enjoy an increased level of autonomy without the efficient use of expert systems. Merely increasing the computational speed of uniprocessors may not be able to guarantee that real time demands are met for large expert systems. Speed-up via parallel processing must be pursued alongside the optimization of sequential implementations. Prototypes of parallel expert systems have been built at universities and industrial labs in the U.S. and Japan. The state-of-the-art research in progress related to parallel execution of expert systems was surveyed. The survey is divided into three major sections: (1) multiprocessors for parallel expert systems; (2) parallel languages for symbolic computations; and (3) measurements of parallelism of expert system. Results to date indicate that the parallelism achieved for these systems is small. In order to obtain greater speed-ups, data parallelism and application parallelism must be exploited

Parallel Architectures for Planetary Exploration Requirements (PAPER)

The Parallel Architectures for Planetary Exploration Requirements (PAPER) project is essentially research oriented towards technology insertion issues for NASA's unmanned planetary probes. It was initiated to complement and augment the long-term efforts for space exploration with particular reference to NASA/LaRC's (NASA Langley Research Center) research needs for planetary exploration missions of the mid and late 1990s. The requirements for space missions as given in the somewhat dated Advanced Information Processing Systems (AIPS) requirements document are contrasted with the new requirements from JPL/Caltech involving sensor data capture and scene analysis. It is shown that more stringent requirements have arisen as a result of technological advancements. Two possible architectures, the AIPS Proof of Concept (POC) configuration and the MAX Fault-tolerant dataflow multiprocessor, were evaluated. The main observation was that the AIPS design is biased towards fault tolerance and may not be an ideal architecture for planetary and deep space probes due to high cost and complexity. The MAX concepts appears to be a promising candidate, except that more detailed information is required. The feasibility for adding neural computation capability to this architecture needs to be studied. Key impact issues for architectural design of computing systems meant for planetary missions were also identified

Ada as an implementation language for knowledge based systems

Debates about the selection of programming languages often produce cultural collisions that are not easily resolved. This is especially true in the case of Ada and knowledge based programming. The construction of programming tools provides a desirable alternative for resolving the conflict

Some aspects of the efficient use of multiprocessor control systems

Computer technology, particularly at the circuit level, is fast approaching its physical limitations. As future needs for greater power from computing systems grows, increases in circuit switching speed (and thus instruction speed) will be unable to match these requirements. Greater power can also be obtained by incorporating several processing units into a single system. This ability to increase the performance of a system by the addition of processing units is one of the major advantages of multiprocessor systems. Four major characteristics of multiprocessor systems have been identified (28) which demonstrate their advantage. These are:- Throughput Flexibility Availability Reliability The additional throughput obtained from a multiprocessor has been mentioned above.. This increase in the power of the system can be obtained in a modular fashion with extra processors being added as greater processing needs arise. The addition of extra processors also has (in general) the desirable advantage of giving a smoother cost - performance curve ( 63). Flexibility is obtained from the increased ability to construct a system matching the user 'requirements at a given time without placing restrictions upon future expansion. With multiprocessor systems; the potential also exists of making greater use of the resources within the system. Availability and reliability are inter-related. Increased availability is achieved, in a well designed system, by ensuring that processing capabilities can be provided to the user even if one (or more) of the processing units has failed. The service provided, however, will probably be degraded due to the reduction in processing capacity. Increased reliability is obtained by the ability of the processing units to compensate for the failure of one of their number. This recovery may involve complex software checks and a consequent decrease in available power even when all the units are functioning

Towards co-designed optimizations in parallel frameworks: A MapReduce case study

The explosion of Big Data was followed by the proliferation of numerous complex parallel software stacks whose aim is to tackle the challenges of data deluge. A drawback of a such multi-layered hierarchical deployment is the inability to maintain and delegate vital semantic information between layers in the stack. Software abstractions increase the semantic distance between an application and its generated code. However, parallel software frameworks contain inherent semantic information that general purpose compilers are not designed to exploit. This paper presents a case study demonstrating how the specific semantic information of the MapReduce paradigm can be exploited on multicore architectures. MR4J has been implemented in Java and evaluated against hand-optimized C and C++ equivalents. The initial observed results led to the design of a semantically aware optimizer that runs automatically without requiring modification to application code. The optimizer is able to speedup the execution time of MR4J by up to 2.0x. The introduced optimization not only improves the performance of the generated code, during the map phase, but also reduces the pressure on the garbage collector. This demonstrates how semantic information can be harnessed without sacrificing sound software engineering practices when using parallel software frameworks.Comment: 8 page