Suppress vibration on robotic polishing with impedance matching

Installing force-controlled end-effectors on the end of industrial robots has become the mainstream method for robot force control. Additionally, during the polishing process, contact force stability has an important impact on polishing quality. However, due to the difference between the robot structure and the force-controlled end-effector, in the polishing operation, direct force control will have impact during the transition from noncontact to contact between the tool and the workpiece. Although impedance control can solve this problem, industrial robots still produce vibrations with high inertia and low stiffness. Therefore, this research proposes an impedance matching control strategy based on traditional direct force control and impedance control methods to improve this problem. This method's primary purpose is to avoid force vibration in the contact phase and maintain force-tracking performance during the dynamic tracking phase. Simulation and experimental results show that this method can smoothly track the contact force and reduce vibration compared with traditional force control and impedance control

Propuesta de inclusión de esfuerzos en el control de un brazo robot para asegurar el cumplimiento de la rugosidad superficial durante operaciones de lijado en diferentes materiales

Tesis por compendio[ES] El mecanizado con brazos robots ha sido estudiado aproximadamente desde los años 90, durante este tiempo se han llevado a cabo importantes avances y descubrimientos en cuanto a su campo de aplicación. En general, los robots manipuladores tienen muchos beneficios y ventajas al ser usados en operaciones de mecanizado, tales como, flexibilidad, gran área de trabajo y facilidad de programación, entre otras, frente a las Máquinas Herramientas de Control numérico (MHCN) que necesitan de una gran inversión para trabajar piezas muy grandes o incrementar sus grados de libertad. Como desventajas, frente a las MHCN, los brazos robóticos poseen menor rigidez, lo que combinado con las altas fuerzas producidas en los procesos de mecanizado hace que aparezcan errores de precisión, desviaciones en las trayectorias, vibraciones y, por consiguiente, una mala calidad en las piezas fabricadas. Entre los brazos robots, los brazos colaborativos están en auge debido a su programación intuitiva y a sus medidas de seguridad, que les permiten trabajar en el mismo espacio que los operadores sin que estos corran riesgos. Como desventaja añadida de los robots colaborativos se encuentra la mayor flexibilidad que estos tienen en sus articulaciones, debido a que incluyen reductores del tipo Harmonic drive. El uso de un control de fuerza en procesos de mecanizado con brazos robots permite controlar y corregir en tiempo real las desviaciones generadas por la flexibilidad en las articulaciones del robot. Utilizar este método de control es beneficioso en cualquier brazo robot; sin embargo, el control interno que incluyen los robots colaborativos presenta ventajas que permiten que el control de fuerza pueda ser aplicado de una manera más eficiente. En el presente trabajo se desarrolla una propuesta real para la inclusión del control de esfuerzos en el brazo robot, así como también, se evalúa y cuantifica la capacidad de los robots industriales y colaborativos en tareas de mecanizado. La propuesta plantea cómo mejorar la utilización de un control de fuerza por bucle interior/exterior aplicado en un brazo colaborativo cuando se desconocen los pares reales de los motores del robot, así como otros parámetros internos que los fabricantes no dan a conocer. Este bucle de control interior/exterior ha sido utilizado en aplicaciones de pulido y lijado sobre diferentes materiales. Los resultados indican que el robot colaborativo es factible para realizar tales operaciones de mecanizado. Sus mejores resultados se obtienen cuando se utiliza un bucle de control interno por velocidad y un bucle de control externo de fuerza con algoritmos, Proporcional-Integral-Derivativo o Proporcional más Pre-Alimentación de la Fuerza.[CA] El mecanitzat amb braços robots ha estat estudiat aproximadament des dels anys 90, durant aquest temps s'han dut a terme importants avanços i descobriments en el que fa al seu camp d'aplicació. En general, els robots manipuladors tenen molts beneficis i avantatges al ser usats en operacions de mecanitzat, com ara, flexibilitat, gran àrea de treball i facilitat de programació, entre d'altres, davant de Màquines Eines de Control Numèric (MECN) que necessiten d'una gran inversió per treballar peces molt grans o incrementar els seus graus de llibertat. Com a desavantatges, enfront de les MECN, els braços robòtics posseeixen menor rigidesa, el que combinat amb les altes forces produïdes en els processos de mecanitzat fa que apareguin errors de precisió, desviacions en les trajectòries, vibracions i, per tant, una mala qualitat en les peces fabricades. Entre els braços robots, els braços col·laboratius estan en auge a causa de la seva programació intuïtiva i a les seves mesures de seguretat, que els permeten treballar en el mateix espai que els operadors sense que aquests corrin riscos. Com desavantatge afegida als robots col·laboratius es troba la major flexibilitat que aquests tenen en les seves articulacions, a causa de que inclouen reductors del tipus Harmonic drive. L'ús d'un control de força en processos de mecanitzat amb braços robots permet controlar, i corregir, en temps real les desviacions generades per la flexibilitat en les articulacions del robot. Utilitzar aquest mètode de control és beneficiós en qualsevol braç robot, però, el control intern que inclouen els robots col·laboratius presenta avantatges que permeten que el control de força es puga aplicar d'una manera més eficient. En el present treball es desenvolupa una proposta real per a la inclusió del control d'esforços en el braç robot, així com s'avalua i quantifica la capacitat dels robots industrials i col·laboratius en tasques de mecanitzat. La proposta planteja com millorar la utilització d'un control de força per bucle interior/exterior aplicat en un braç col·laboratiu, quan es desconeixen els parells reals dels motors del robot, així com altres paràmetres interns que els fabricants no donen a conèixer. Aquest bucle de control interior/exterior ha estat utilitzat en aplicacions de polit sobre diferents materials. Els resultats indiquen que el robot col·laboratiu és factible de realitzar aquestes operacions de mecanitzat. Els seus millors resultats s'obtenen quan s'utilitza un bucle de control intern per velocitat i un bucle de control extern de força amb els algoritmes Proporcional-Integral-Derivatiu o Proporcional més Pre-alimentació de la Força.[EN] Machining with robot arms has been studied approximately since the 90s; during this time, important advances and discoveries have been made in its field of application. In general, manipulative robots have many benefits and advantages when they are used in machining operations, such as flexibility, large work area, and ease of programming, among others, compared to Numerical Control Machine Tools (NCMT) that need a great investment to work very large pieces or increase their degrees of freedom. As for disadvantages, compared to NCMT, robotic arms have lower rigidity, which, combined with the high forces produced in machining processes, causes precision errors, path deviations, vibrations, and, consequently, poor quality in the manufactured parts. Among robot arms, collaborative arms are on the rise due to their intuitive programming and safety measures, which allow them to work in the same space without risk for the operators. An added disadvantage of collaborative robots is their flexibility in their joints because they include Harmonic drive type reducers. The use of force control in machining processes with robot arms makes possible to control and correct, in real-time, the deviations generated by the flexibility in the robot's joints. The use of this control method is beneficial for any robot arm. However, the internal control included in collaborative robots has advantages that allow the force control to be applied more efficiently. In this work, a real proposal is developed to include effort control in the robot arm. The capacity of industrial and collaborative robots in machining tasks is evaluated and quantified. The proposal recommends how to improve the use of an inner/outer force control loop applied in a collaborative arm, when the real torques of the robot's motors are unknown and other internal parameters that manufacturers do not disclose. This inner/outer control loop has been used in polishing and sanding applications on different materials. The results indicate that the collaborative robot is feasible to perform such machining operations. Best results are obtained using an internal velocity control loop and external force control loop with Proportional-Integral-Derivative or Proportional plus Feed Forward.The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and European Union, grant DPI2016-81002-R (AEI/FEDER, UE). This work was funded by the CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2017 – 72180157.Pérez Ubeda, RA. (2022). Propuesta de inclusión de esfuerzos en el control de un brazo robot para asegurar el cumplimiento de la rugosidad superficial durante operaciones de lijado en diferentes materiales [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/182000TESISCompendi

Force Control Improvement in Collaborative Robots through Theory Analysis and Experimental Endorsement

[EN] Due to the elasticity of their joints, collaborative robots are seldom used in applications with force control. Besides, the industrial robot controllers are closed and do not allow the user to access the motor torques and other parameters, hindering the possibility of carrying out a customized control. A good alternative to achieve a custom force control is sending the output of the force regulator to the robot controller through motion commands (inner/outer loop control). There are different types of motion commands (e.g., position or velocity). They may be implemented in different ways (Jacobian inverse vs. Jacobian transpose), but this information is usually not available for the user. This article is dedicated to the analysis of the effect of different inner loops and their combination with several external controllers. Two of the most determinant factors found are the type of the inner loop and the stiffness matrix. The theoretical deductions have been experimentally verified on a collaborative robot UR3, allowing us to choose the best behaviour in a polishing operation according to pre-established criteria.The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and European Union, grant DPI2016-81002-R (AEI/FEDER, UE), to the research work here published. Rodrigo Perez-Ubeda is grateful to the Ph.D. Grant CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2017-72180157.Pérez-Ubeda, R.; Zotovic Stanisic, R.; Gutiérrez, SC. (2020). Force Control Improvement in Collaborative Robots through Theory Analysis and Experimental Endorsement. Applied Sciences. 10(12):1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124329S1241012Top Trends Robotics 2020—International Federation of Robotics https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/top-trends-robotics-2020Gaz, C., Magrini, E., & De Luca, A. (2018). A model-based residual approach for human-robot collaboration during manual polishing operations. Mechatronics, 55, 234-247. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.02.014Iglesias, I., Sebastián, M. A., & Ares, J. E. (2015). Overview of the State of Robotic Machining: Current Situation and Future Potential. Procedia Engineering, 132, 911-917. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.577Perez-Ubeda, R., Gutierrez, S. C., Zotovic, R., & Lluch-Cerezo, J. (2019). Study of the application of a collaborative robot for machining tasks. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 867-874. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.009Spong, M. W. (1989). On the force control problem for flexible joint manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34(1), 107-111. doi:10.1109/9.8661Ren, T., Dong, Y., Wu, D., & Chen, K. (2019). Impedance control of collaborative robots based on joint torque servo with active disturbance rejection. Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application, 46(4), 518-528. doi:10.1108/ir-06-2018-0130Ajoudani, A., Tsagarakis, N. G., & Bicchi, A. (2017). Choosing Poses for Force and Stiffness Control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(6), 1483-1490. doi:10.1109/tro.2017.2708087Magrini, E., & De Luca, A. (2016). Hybrid force/velocity control for physical human-robot collaboration tasks. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759151Ahmad, S. (1993). Constrained motion (force/position) control of flexible joint robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(2), 374-381. doi:10.1109/21.229451Calanca, A., & Fiorini, P. (2018). Understanding Environment-Adaptive Force Control of Series Elastic Actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 23(1), 413-423. doi:10.1109/tmech.2018.2790350Oh, S., & Kong, K. (2017). High-Precision Robust Force Control of a Series Elastic Actuator. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22(1), 71-80. doi:10.1109/tmech.2016.2614503Yin, H., Li, S., & Wang, H. (2016). Sliding mode position/force control for motion synchronization of a flexible-joint manipulator system with time delay. 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). doi:10.1109/chicc.2016.7554329Ma, Z., Hong, G.-S., Ang, M. H., Poo, A.-N., & Lin, W. (2018). A Force Control Method with Positive Feedback for Industrial Finishing Applications. 2018 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). doi:10.1109/aim.2018.8452689Huang, L., Ge, S. S., & Lee, T. H. (2006). Position/force control of uncertain constrained flexible joint robots. Mechatronics, 16(2), 111-120. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2005.10.002Chiaverini, S., Siciliano, B., & Villani, L. (1999). A survey of robot interaction control schemes with experimental comparison. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 4(3), 273-285. doi:10.1109/3516.789685Winkler, A., & Suchy, J. (2016). Explicit and implicit force control of an industrial manipulator — An experimental summary. 2016 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). doi:10.1109/mmar.2016.7575081Neranon, P., & Bicker, R. (2016). Force/position control of a robot manipulator for human-robot interaction. Thermal Science, 20(suppl. 2), 537-548. doi:10.2298/tsci151005036nChen, S., Zhang, T., & Zou, Y. (2017). Fuzzy-Sliding Mode Force Control Research on Robotic Machining. Journal of Robotics, 2017, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2017/8128479Lin, H.-I., & Dubey, V. (2018). Design of an Adaptive Force Controlled Robotic Polishing System Using Adaptive Fuzzy-PID. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 825-836. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01370-7_64Perez-Vidal, C., Gracia, L., Sanchez-Caballero, S., Solanes, J. E., Saccon, A., & Tornero, J. (2019). Design of a polishing tool for collaborative robotics using minimum viable product approach. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 32(9), 848-857. doi:10.1080/0951192x.2019.1637026Chen, F., Zhao, H., Li, D., Chen, L., Tan, C., & Ding, H. (2019). Contact force control and vibration suppression in robotic polishing with a smart end effector. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 57, 391-403. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.019Mohammad, A. E. K., Hong, J., & Wang, D. (2018). Design of a force-controlled end-effector with low-inertia effect for robotic polishing using macro-mini robot approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 49, 54-65. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2017.05.011Xiao, C., Wang, Q., Zhou, X., Xu, Z., Lao, X., & Chen, Y. (2019). Hybrid Force/Position Control Strategy for Electromagnetic based Robotic Polishing Systems. 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC). doi:10.23919/chicc.2019.8865183Li, J., Zhang, T., Liu, X., Guan, Y., & Wang, D. (2018). A Survey of Robotic Polishing. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). doi:10.1109/robio.2018.8664890Zollo, L., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., Guglielmelli, E., & Dario, P. (2004). Compliance Control for an Anthropomorphic Robot with Elastic Joints: Theory and Experiments. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 127(3), 321-328. doi:10.1115/1.1978911Han, D., Duan, X., Li, M., Cui, T., Ma, A., & Ma, X. (2017). Interaction Control for Manipulator with compliant end-effector based on hybrid position-force control. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). doi:10.1109/icma.2017.8015929Schindlbeck, C., & Haddadin, S. (2015). Unified passivity-based Cartesian force/impedance control for rigid and flexible joint robots via task-energy tanks. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139036Zotovic Stanisic, R., & Valera Fernández, Á. (2009). Simultaneous velocity, impact and force control. Robotica, 27(7), 1039-1048. doi:10.1017/s0263574709005451Volpe, R., & Khosla, P. (1993). A theoretical and experimental investigation of explicit force control strategies for manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38(11), 1634-1650. doi:10.1109/9.262033Zeng, G., & Hemami, A. (1997). An overview of robot force control. Robotica, 15(5), 473-482. doi:10.1017/s026357479700057xSalisbury, J. (1980). Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates. 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes. doi:10.1109/cdc.1980.272026Chen, S.-F., & Kao, I. (2000). Conservative Congruence Transformation for Joint and Cartesian Stiffness Matrices of Robotic Hands and Fingers. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 19(9), 835-847. doi:10.1177/02783640022067201Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics DLR Light Weight Robot III https://www.dlr.de/rm/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-12464/#gallery/2916

Research on hybrid manufacturing using industrial robot

The applications of using industrial robots in hybrid manufacturing overcome many restrictions of the conventional manufacturing methods, such as small part building size, long building period, and limited material choices. However, some problems such as the uneven distribution of motion accuracy within robot working volume, the acceleration impact of robot under heavy external loads, few methods and facilities for increasing the efficiency of hybrid manufacturing process are still challenging. This dissertation aims to improve the applications of using industrial robot in hybrid manufacturing by addressing following three categories research issues. The first research issue proposed a novel concept view on robot accuracy and stiffness problem, for making the maximum usage of current manufacturing capability of robot system. Based on analyzing the robot forward/inverse kinematic, the angle error sensitivity of different joint and the stiffness matrix properties of robot, new evaluation formulations are established to help finding the best position and orientation to perform a specific trajectory within the robot\u27s working volume. The second research issue focus on the engineering improvements of robotic hybrid manufacturing. By adopting stereo vision, laser scanning technology and curved surface compensation algorithm, it enhances the automation level and adaptiveness of hybrid manufacturing process. The third research issue extends the robotic hybrid manufacturing process to the broader application area. A mini extruder with a variable pitch and progressive diameter screw is developed for large scale robotic deposition. The proposed robotic deposition system could increase the building efficiency and quality for large-size parts. Moreover, the research results of this dissertation can benefit a wide range of industries, such as automation manufacturing, robot design and 3D printing --Abstract, page iv

Robots in machining

Robotic machining centers offer diverse advantages: large operation reach with large reorientation capability, and a low cost, to name a few. Many challenges have slowed down the adoption or sometimes inhibited the use of robots for machining tasks. This paper deals with the current usage and status of robots in machining, as well as the necessary modelling and identification for enabling optimization, process planning and process control. Recent research addressing deburring, milling, incremental forming, polishing or thin wall machining is presented. We discuss various processes in which robots need to deal with significant process forces while fulfilling their machining task

Robot Manipulators

Robot manipulators are developing more in the direction of industrial robots than of human workers. Recently, the applications of robot manipulators are spreading their focus, for example Da Vinci as a medical robot, ASIMO as a humanoid robot and so on. There are many research topics within the field of robot manipulators, e.g. motion planning, cooperation with a human, and fusion with external sensors like vision, haptic and force, etc. Moreover, these include both technical problems in the industry and theoretical problems in the academic fields. This book is a collection of papers presenting the latest research issues from around the world

Industrial Robotics for Advanced Machining

This work presents a literature review of the current state of robotic machining with industrial machining robots, primarily those with 6-axis end effectors and serial link (anthropomorphic) construction. Various disadvantages of robotic machining in industry are presented, as well as the methods applied to mitigate them and discussions of their effects. From this review, the methods of dynamic modelling, stability prediction and configuration control are selected for application to the task of optimisation of a robotic machining cell for drilling operations. Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA) and methods developed by Klimchik et al. are used for compliance modelling, stability prediction methods developed by Altintas et al. and machining stability lobe prediction are then applied to a robotic drilling process, as explored by Mousavi et al. This optimisation method is applied using the measured and estimated properties of an ABB IRB 6640 robot and results are presented in comparison with previous experimentation with the physical robot, and analytical stability predictions from the same cutting parameters with Cutpro software. Results are discussed in the concluding chapters, as well as discontinued parts of the project and suggestions for future work

Geometrical Error Analysis and Correction in Robotic Grinding

The use of robots in industrial applications has been widespread in the manufacturing tasks such as welding, finishing, polishing and grinding. Most robotic grinding focus on the surface finish rather than accuracy and precision. Therefore, it is important to advance the technology of robotic machining so that more practical and competitive systems can be developed for components that have accuracy and precision requirement. This thesis focuses on improving the level of accuracy in robotic grinding which is a significant challenge in robotic applications because of the kinematic accuracy of the robot movement which is much more complex than normal CNC machine tools. Therefore, aiming to improve the robot accuracy, this work provides a novel method to define the geometrical error by using the cutting tool as a probe whilst using Acoustic Emission monitoring to modify robot commands and to detect surfaces of the workpiece. The work also includes an applicable mathematical model for compensating machining errors in relation to its geometrical position as well as applying an optimum grinding method to motivate the need of eliminating the residual error when performing abrasive grinding using the robot. The work has demonstrated an improved machining precision level from 50µm to 30µm which is controlled by considering the process influential variables, such as depth of cut, wheel speed, feed speed, dressing condition and system time constant. The recorded data and associated error reduction provide a significant evidence to support the viability of implementing a robotic system for various grinding applications, combining more quality and critical surface finishing practices, and an increased focus on the size and form of generated components. This method could provide more flexibility to help designers and manufacturers to control the final accuracy for machining a product using a robot system