22,952 research outputs found
Global Cardinality Constraints Make Approximating Some Max-2-CSPs Harder
Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, we show that existing approximation algorithms for some Boolean Max-2-CSPs with cardinality constraints are optimal. In particular, we prove that Max-Cut with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.858, and that Max-2-Sat with cardinality constraints is UG-hard to approximate within ~~0.929. In both cases, the previous best hardness results were the same as the hardness of the corresponding unconstrained Max-2-CSP (~~0.878 for Max-Cut, and ~~0.940 for Max-2-Sat).
The hardness for Max-2-Sat applies to monotone Max-2-Sat instances, meaning that we also obtain tight inapproximability for the Max-k-Vertex-Cover problem
Distributed PCP Theorems for Hardness of Approximation in P
We present a new distributed model of probabilistically checkable proofs
(PCP). A satisfying assignment to a CNF formula is
shared between two parties, where Alice knows , Bob knows
, and both parties know . The goal is to have
Alice and Bob jointly write a PCP that satisfies , while
exchanging little or no information. Unfortunately, this model as-is does not
allow for nontrivial query complexity. Instead, we focus on a non-deterministic
variant, where the players are helped by Merlin, a third party who knows all of
.
Using our framework, we obtain, for the first time, PCP-like reductions from
the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) to approximation problems in P.
In particular, under SETH we show that there are no truly-subquadratic
approximation algorithms for Bichromatic Maximum Inner Product over
{0,1}-vectors, Bichromatic LCS Closest Pair over permutations, Approximate
Regular Expression Matching, and Diameter in Product Metric. All our
inapproximability factors are nearly-tight. In particular, for the first two
problems we obtain nearly-polynomial factors of ; only
-factor lower bounds (under SETH) were known before
Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
We survey results on the hardness of approximating combinatorial optimization
problems
Sticky Brownian Rounding and its Applications to Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Semidefinite programming is a powerful tool in the design and analysis of
approximation algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. In
particular, the random hyperplane rounding method of Goemans and Williamson has
been extensively studied for more than two decades, resulting in various
extensions to the original technique and beautiful algorithms for a wide range
of applications. Despite the fact that this approach yields tight approximation
guarantees for some problems, e.g., Max-Cut, for many others, e.g., Max-SAT and
Max-DiCut, the tight approximation ratio is still unknown. One of the main
reasons for this is the fact that very few techniques for rounding semidefinite
relaxations are known.
In this work, we present a new general and simple method for rounding
semi-definite programs, based on Brownian motion. Our approach is inspired by
recent results in algorithmic discrepancy theory. We develop and present tools
for analyzing our new rounding algorithms, utilizing mathematical machinery
from the theory of Brownian motion, complex analysis, and partial differential
equations. Focusing on constraint satisfaction problems, we apply our method to
several classical problems, including Max-Cut, Max-2SAT, and MaxDiCut, and
derive new algorithms that are competitive with the best known results. To
illustrate the versatility and general applicability of our approach, we give
new approximation algorithms for the Max-Cut problem with side constraints that
crucially utilizes measure concentration results for the Sticky Brownian
Motion, a feature missing from hyperplane rounding and its generalization
On the Quantitative Hardness of CVP
For odd
integers (and ), we show that the Closest Vector Problem
in the norm (\CVP_p) over rank lattices cannot be solved in
2^{(1-\eps) n} time for any constant \eps > 0 unless the Strong Exponential
Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. We then extend this result to "almost all" values
of , not including the even integers. This comes tantalizingly close
to settling the quantitative time complexity of the important special case of
\CVP_2 (i.e., \CVP in the Euclidean norm), for which a -time
algorithm is known. In particular, our result applies for any
that approaches as .
We also show a similar SETH-hardness result for \SVP_\infty; hardness of
approximating \CVP_p to within some constant factor under the so-called
Gap-ETH assumption; and other quantitative hardness results for \CVP_p and
\CVPP_p for any under different assumptions
From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More
We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of
polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and
fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked
several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a
non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and
Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the
optimal solution. In particular, letting be the optimum and be
the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in
time and outputs a solution of size
, for any functions and that are independent of (for
Clique, we want )?
In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial
FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function
(e.g., this holds even if is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results
imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even
approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold
under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which
states that no -time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable
3SAT formula and one which is not even -satisfiable for some
constant .
Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for
Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and
Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest -Subgraph although this
ratio does not yet match the trivial -approximation algorithm.Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'1
- …