761 research outputs found
Defective Coloring on Classes of Perfect Graphs
In Defective Coloring we are given a graph and two integers ,
and are asked if we can -color so that the maximum
degree induced by any color class is at most . We show that this
natural generalization of Coloring is much harder on several basic graph
classes. In particular, we show that it is NP-hard on split graphs, even when
one of the two parameters , is set to the smallest possible
fixed value that does not trivialize the problem ( or ). Together with a simple treewidth-based DP algorithm this completely
determines the complexity of the problem also on chordal graphs. We then
consider the case of cographs and show that, somewhat surprisingly, Defective
Coloring turns out to be one of the few natural problems which are NP-hard on
this class. We complement this negative result by showing that Defective
Coloring is in P for cographs if either or is fixed; that
it is in P for trivially perfect graphs; and that it admits a sub-exponential
time algorithm for cographs when both and are unbounded
Defective and Clustered Graph Colouring
Consider the following two ways to colour the vertices of a graph where the
requirement that adjacent vertices get distinct colours is relaxed. A colouring
has "defect" if each monochromatic component has maximum degree at most
. A colouring has "clustering" if each monochromatic component has at
most vertices. This paper surveys research on these types of colourings,
where the first priority is to minimise the number of colours, with small
defect or small clustering as a secondary goal. List colouring variants are
also considered. The following graph classes are studied: outerplanar graphs,
planar graphs, graphs embeddable in surfaces, graphs with given maximum degree,
graphs with given maximum average degree, graphs excluding a given subgraph,
graphs with linear crossing number, linklessly or knotlessly embeddable graphs,
graphs with given Colin de Verdi\`ere parameter, graphs with given
circumference, graphs excluding a fixed graph as an immersion, graphs with
given thickness, graphs with given stack- or queue-number, graphs excluding
as a minor, graphs excluding as a minor, and graphs excluding
an arbitrary graph as a minor. Several open problems are discussed.Comment: This is a preliminary version of a dynamic survey to be published in
the Electronic Journal of Combinatoric
The t-improper chromatic number of random graphs
We consider the -improper chromatic number of the Erd{\H o}s-R{\'e}nyi
random graph . The t-improper chromatic number of is
the smallest number of colours needed in a colouring of the vertices in which
each colour class induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most . If ,
then this is the usual notion of proper colouring. When the edge probability
is constant, we provide a detailed description of the asymptotic behaviour
of over the range of choices for the growth of .Comment: 12 page
Ramified rectilinear polygons: coordinatization by dendrons
Simple rectilinear polygons (i.e. rectilinear polygons without holes or
cutpoints) can be regarded as finite rectangular cell complexes coordinatized
by two finite dendrons. The intrinsic -metric is thus inherited from the
product of the two finite dendrons via an isometric embedding. The rectangular
cell complexes that share this same embedding property are called ramified
rectilinear polygons. The links of vertices in these cell complexes may be
arbitrary bipartite graphs, in contrast to simple rectilinear polygons where
the links of points are either 4-cycles or paths of length at most 3. Ramified
rectilinear polygons are particular instances of rectangular complexes obtained
from cube-free median graphs, or equivalently simply connected rectangular
complexes with triangle-free links. The underlying graphs of finite ramified
rectilinear polygons can be recognized among graphs in linear time by a
Lexicographic Breadth-First-Search. Whereas the symmetry of a simple
rectilinear polygon is very restricted (with automorphism group being a
subgroup of the dihedral group ), ramified rectilinear polygons are
universal: every finite group is the automorphism group of some ramified
rectilinear polygon.Comment: 27 pages, 6 figure
- …