161 research outputs found
Impredicative Encodings of (Higher) Inductive Types
Postulating an impredicative universe in dependent type theory allows System
F style encodings of finitary inductive types, but these fail to satisfy the
relevant {\eta}-equalities and consequently do not admit dependent eliminators.
To recover {\eta} and dependent elimination, we present a method to construct
refinements of these impredicative encodings, using ideas from homotopy type
theory. We then extend our method to construct impredicative encodings of some
higher inductive types, such as 1-truncation and the unit circle S1
Reasoning about modular datatypes with Mendler induction
In functional programming, datatypes a la carte provide a convenient modular
representation of recursive datatypes, based on their initial algebra
semantics. Unfortunately it is highly challenging to implement this technique
in proof assistants that are based on type theory, like Coq. The reason is that
it involves type definitions, such as those of type-level fixpoint operators,
that are not strictly positive. The known work-around of impredicative
encodings is problematic, insofar as it impedes conventional inductive
reasoning. Weak induction principles can be used instead, but they considerably
complicate proofs.
This paper proposes a novel and simpler technique to reason inductively about
impredicative encodings, based on Mendler-style induction. This technique
involves dispensing with dependent induction, ensuring that datatypes can be
lifted to predicates and relying on relational formulations. A case study on
proving subject reduction for structural operational semantics illustrates that
the approach enables modular proofs, and that these proofs are essentially
similar to conventional ones.Comment: In Proceedings FICS 2015, arXiv:1509.0282
Relational parametricity for higher kinds
Reynoldsâ notion of relational parametricity has been extremely influential and well studied for polymorphic programming languages and type theories based on System F. The extension of relational parametricity to higher kinded polymorphism, which allows quantification over type operators as well as types, has not received as much attention. We present a model of relational parametricity for System FÏ, within the impredicative Calculus of Inductive Constructions, and show how it forms an instance of a general class of models defined by Hasegawa. We investigate some of the consequences of our model and show that it supports the definition of inductive types, indexed by an arbitrary kind, and with reasoning principles provided by initiality
Relational Parametricity and Control
We study the equational theory of Parigot's second-order
λμ-calculus in connection with a call-by-name continuation-passing
style (CPS) translation into a fragment of the second-order λ-calculus.
It is observed that the relational parametricity on the target calculus induces
a natural notion of equivalence on the λμ-terms. On the other hand,
the unconstrained relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus turns
out to be inconsistent with this CPS semantics. Following these facts, we
propose to formulate the relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus
in a constrained way, which might be called ``focal parametricity''.Comment: 22 pages, for Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Parametricity in an Impredicative Sort
Reynold\u27s abstraction theorem is now a well-established result for a
large class of type systems. We propose here a definition of relational parametricity and a proof of the abstraction theorem in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions (CIC), the underlying formal language of Coq, in which parametricity relations\u27 codomain is the impredicative sort of propositions. To proceed, we need to refine this calculus by splitting the sort hierarchy to separate informative terms from non-informative terms. This refinement is very close to CIC, but with the property that typing judgments can distinguish informative terms. Among many applications, this natural encoding of parametricity inside CIC serves both theoretical purposes (proving the independence of propositions with respect to the logical system) as well as practical aspirations (proving properties of finite algebraic structures). We finally discuss how we can simply build, on top of our calculus, a new reflexive Coq tactic that constructs proof terms by parametricity
In Praise of Impredicativity: A Contribution to the Formalization of Meta-Programming
Processing programs as data is one of the successes of functional and logic programming. Higher-order functions, as program-processing programs are called in functional programming, and meta-programs, as they are called in logic programming, are widespread declarative programming techniques. In logic programming, there is a gap between the meta-programming practice and its theory: The formalizations of meta-programming do not explicitly address its impredicativity and are not fully adequate. This article aims at overcoming this unsatisfactory situation by discussing the relevance of impredicativity to meta-programming, by revisiting former formalizations of meta-programming, and by defining Reflective Predicate Logic, a conservative extension of first-order logic, which provides a simple formalization of meta-programming
Syntax for free: representing syntax with binding using parametricity
We show that, in a parametric model of polymorphism, the type ââα.â((αâââα)âââα)âââ(αâââαâââα)âââα is isomorphic to closed de Bruijn terms. That is, the type of closed higher-order abstract syntax terms is isomorphic to a concrete representation. To demonstrate the proof we have constructed a model of parametric polymorphism inside the Coq proof assistant. The proof of the theorem requires parametricity over Kripke relations. We also investigate some variants of this representation
- âŠ