Breaking Instance-Independent Symmetries In Exact Graph Coloring

Code optimization and high level synthesis can be posed as constraint satisfaction and optimization problems, such as graph coloring used in register allocation. Graph coloring is also used to model more traditional CSPs relevant to AI, such as planning, time-tabling and scheduling. Provably optimal solutions may be desirable for commercial and defense applications. Additionally, for applications such as register allocation and code optimization, naturally-occurring instances of graph coloring are often small and can be solved optimally. A recent wave of improvements in algorithms for Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and 0-1 Integer Linear Programming (ILP) suggests generic problem-reduction methods, rather than problem-specific heuristics, because (1) heuristics may be upset by new constraints, (2) heuristics tend to ignore structure, and (3) many relevant problems are provably inapproximable. Problem reductions often lead to highly symmetric SAT instances, and symmetries are known to slow down SAT solvers. In this work, we compare several avenues for symmetry breaking, in particular when certain kinds of symmetry are present in all generated instances. Our focus on reducing CSPs to SAT allows us to leverage recent dramatic improvement in SAT solvers and automatically benefit from future progress. We can use a variety of black-box SAT solvers without modifying their source code because our symmetry-breaking techniques are static, i.e., we detect symmetries and add symmetry breaking predicates (SBPs) during pre-processing. An important result of our work is that among the types of instance-independent SBPs we studied and their combinations, the simplest and least complete constructions are the most effective. Our experiments also clearly indicate that instance-independent symmetries should mostly be processed together with instance-specific symmetries rather than at the specification level, contrary to what has been suggested in the literature

A Stackelberg Solution to Joint Optimization Problems: A Case Study of Green Design

AbstractDesign of complex engineered systems often involves optimization of multiple competing problems that are supposed to compromise to arrive at equilibrium optima, entailing a joint optimization problem. This paper reveals the leader-follower decision structure inherent in joint optimization problems. A Stackelberg game solution is formulated to model a leader-follower joint optimization problem as a two-level optimization problem between two decision makers, implicating a mathematical program that contains sub-optimization problems as its constraints. A case study of coffee grinder green design demonstrates the potential of Stackelberg solution to joint optimization of modularity subject with conflicting goals

Unbounded Scalable Hardware Verification.

Model checking is a formal verification method that has been successfully applied to real-world hardware and software designs. Model checking tools, however, encounter the so-called state-explosion problem, since the size of the state spaces of such designs is exponential in the number of their state elements. In this thesis, we address this problem by exploiting the power of two complementary approaches: (a) counterexample-guided abstraction and refinement (CEGAR) of the design's datapath; and (b) the recently-introduced incremental induction algorithms for approximate reachability. These approaches are well-suited for the verification of control-centric properties in hardware designs consisting of wide datapaths and complex control logic. They also handle most complex design errors in typical hardware designs. Datapath abstraction prunes irrelevant bit-level details of datapath elements, thus greatly reducing the size of the state space that must be analyzed and allowing the verification to be focused on the control logic, where most errors originate. The induction-based approximate reachability algorithms offer the potential of significantly reducing the number of iterations needed to prove/disprove given properties by avoiding the implicit or explicit enumeration of reachable states. Our implementation of this verification framework, which we call the Averroes system, extends the approximate reachability algorithms at the bit level to first-order logic with equality and uninterpreted functions. To facilitate this extension, we formally define the solution space and state space of the abstract transition system produced by datapath abstraction. In addition, we develop an efficient way to represent sets of abstract solutions involving present- and next-states and a systematic way to project such solutions onto the space of just the present-state variables. To further increase the scalability of the Averroes verification system, we introduce the notion of structural abstraction, which extends datapath abstraction with two optimizations for better classification of state variables as either datapath or control, and with efficient memory abstraction techniques. We demonstrate the scalability of this approach by showing that Averroes significantly outperforms bit-level verification on a number of industrial benchmarks.PhDComputer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133375/1/suholee_1.pd

Synthesis of asynchronous controllers using integer linear programming

A novel strategy for the logic synthesis of asynchronous control circuits is presented. It is based on the structural theory of Petri nets and integer linear programming. Techniques that are capable of checking implementability conditions, such as complete state coding, and deriving a gate netlist to implement the specified behavior are presented. These techniques can handle Petri net specifications consisting of several thousands of transitions and provide a significant speed-up compared with techniques that have previously been proposed.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Post-mapping Topology Rewriting for FPGA Area Minimization

Circuit designers require Computer-Aided Design (CAD) tools when compiling designs into Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) in order to achieve high quality results due to the complexity of the compilation tasks involved. Technology mapping is one critical step in the FPGA CAD flow. The final mapping result has significant impact on the subsequent steps of clustering, placement and routing, for the objectives of delay, area and power dissipation. While depth-optimal FPGA technology mapping can be solved in polynomial time, area minimization has proven to be NP-hard. Most modern state-of-the-art FPGA technology mappers are structural in nature; they are based on cut enumeration and use various heuristics to yield depth and area minimized solutions. However, the results produced by structural technology mappers rely strongly on the structure of the input netlists. Hence, it is common to apply additional heuristics after technology mapping to further optimize area and reduce the amount of structural bias while not harming depth. Recently, SAT-based Boolean matching has been used for post-mapping area minimization. However, SAT-based matching is computationally complex and too time consuming in practice. This thesis proposes an alternative Boolean matching approach based on NPN equivalence. Using a library of pre-computed topologies, the matching problem becomes as simple as performing NPN encoding followed by a hash lookup which is very efficient. In conjunction with Ashenhurst decomposition, the NPN-based Boolean matching is allowed to handle up to 10-input Boolean functions. When applied to a large set of designs, the proposed algorithm yields, on average, more than 3% reduction in circuit area without harming circuit depth. The priori generation of a library of topologies can be difficult; the potential difficulty in generating a library of topologies represents one limitation of the proposed algorithm