NeuroFlow: A General Purpose Spiking Neural Network Simulation Platform using Customizable Processors

© 2016 Cheung, Schultz and Luk.NeuroFlow is a scalable spiking neural network simulation platform for off-the-shelf high performance computing systems using customizable hardware processors such as Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). Unlike multi-core processors and application-specific integrated circuits, the processor architecture of NeuroFlow can be redesigned and reconfigured to suit a particular simulation to deliver optimized performance, such as the degree of parallelism to employ. The compilation process supports using PyNN, a simulator-independent neural network description language, to configure the processor. NeuroFlow supports a number of commonly used current or conductance based neuronal models such as integrate-and-fire and Izhikevich models, and the spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule for learning. A 6-FPGA system can simulate a network of up to ~600,000 neurons and can achieve a real-time performance of 400,000 neurons. Using one FPGA, NeuroFlow delivers a speedup of up to 33.6 times the speed of an 8-core processor, or 2.83 times the speed of GPU-based platforms. With high flexibility and throughput, NeuroFlow provides a viable environment for large-scale neural network simulation

Memory and information processing in neuromorphic systems

A striking difference between brain-inspired neuromorphic processors and current von Neumann processors architectures is the way in which memory and processing is organized. As Information and Communication Technologies continue to address the need for increased computational power through the increase of cores within a digital processor, neuromorphic engineers and scientists can complement this need by building processor architectures where memory is distributed with the processing. In this paper we present a survey of brain-inspired processor architectures that support models of cortical networks and deep neural networks. These architectures range from serial clocked implementations of multi-neuron systems to massively parallel asynchronous ones and from purely digital systems to mixed analog/digital systems which implement more biological-like models of neurons and synapses together with a suite of adaptation and learning mechanisms analogous to the ones found in biological nervous systems. We describe the advantages of the different approaches being pursued and present the challenges that need to be addressed for building artificial neural processing systems that can display the richness of behaviors seen in biological systems.Comment: Submitted to Proceedings of IEEE, review of recently proposed neuromorphic computing platforms and system

Scalable event-driven modelling architectures for neuromimetic hardware

Neural networks present a fundamentally different model of computation from the conventional sequential digital model. Dedicated hardware may thus be more suitable for executing them. Given that there is no clear consensus on the model of computation in the brain, model flexibility is at least as important a characteristic of neural hardware as is performance acceleration. The SpiNNaker chip is an example of the emerging 'neuromimetic' architecture, a universal platform that specialises the hardware for neural networks but allows flexibility in model choice. It integrates four key attributes: native parallelism, event-driven processing, incoherent memory and incremental reconfiguration, in a system combining an array of general-purpose processors with a configurable asynchronous interconnect. Making such a device usable in practice requires an environment for instantiating neural models on the chip that allows the user to focus on model characteristics rather than on hardware details. The central part of this system is a library of predesigned, 'drop-in' event-driven neural components that specify their specific implementation on SpiNNaker. Three exemplar models: two spiking networks and a multilayer perceptron network, illustrate techniques that provide a basis for the library and demonstrate a reference methodology that can be extended to support third-party library components not only on SpiNNaker but on any configurable neuromimetic platform. Experiments demonstrate the capability of the library model to implement efficient on-chip neural networks, but also reveal important hardware limitations, particularly with respect to communications, that require careful design. The ultimate goal is the creation of a library-based development system that allows neural modellers to work in the high-level environment of their choice, using an automated tool chain to create the appropriate SpiNNaker instantiation. Such a system would enable the use of the hardware to explore abstractions of biological neurodynamics that underpin a functional model of neural computation.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Parallel simulation of neural networks on SpiNNaker universal neuromorphic hardware

Artificial neural networks have shown great potential and have attracted much research interest. One problem faced when simulating such networks is speed. As the number of neurons increases, the time to simulate and train a network increases dramatically. This makes it difficult to simulate and train a large-scale network system without the support of a high-performance computer system. The solution we present is a "real" parallel system - using a parallel machine to simulate neural networks which are intrinsically parallel applications. SpiNNaker is a scalable massively-parallel computing system under development with the aim of building a general-purpose platform for the parallel simulation of large-scale neural systems. This research investigates how to model large-scale neural networks efficiently on such a parallel machine. While providing increased overall computational power, a parallel architecture introduces a new problem - the increased communication reduces the speedup gains. Modeling schemes, which take into account communication, processing, and storage requirements, are investigated to solve this problem. Since modeling schemes are application-dependent, two different types of neural network are examined - spiking neural networks with spike-time dependent plasticity, and the parallel distributed processing model with the backpropagation learning rule. Different modeling schemes are developed and evaluated for the two types of neural network. The research shows the feasibility of the approach as well as the performance of SpiNNaker as a general-purpose platform for the simulation of neural networks. The linear scalability shown in this architecture provides a path to the further development of parallel solutions for the simulation of extremely large-scale neural networks.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo