9,902 research outputs found
Upside-down Deduction
Over the recent years, several proposals were made to enhance database systems with automated reasoning. In this article we analyze two such enhancements based on meta-interpretation. We consider on the one hand the theorem prover Satchmo, on the other hand the Alexander and Magic Set methods. Although they achieve different goals and are based on distinct reasoning paradigms, Satchmo and the Alexander or Magic Set methods can be similarly described by upside-down meta-interpreters, i.e., meta-interpreters implementing one reasoning principle in terms of the other. Upside-down meta-interpretation gives rise to simple and efficient implementations, but has not been investigated in the past. This article is devoted to studying this technique. We show that it permits one to inherit a search strategy from an inference engine, instead of implementing it, and to combine bottom-up and top-down reasoning. These properties yield an explanation for the efficiency of Satchmo and a justification for the unconventional approach to top-down reasoning of the Alexander and Magic Set methods
Improving the Deductive System DES with Persistence by Using SQL DBMS's
This work presents how persistent predicates have been included in the
in-memory deductive system DES by relying on external SQL database management
systems. We introduce how persistence is supported from a user-point of view
and the possible applications the system opens up, as the deductive expressive
power is projected to relational databases. Also, we describe how it is
possible to intermix computations of the deductive engine and the external
database, explaining its implementation and some optimizations. Finally, a
performance analysis is undertaken, comparing the system with current
relational database systems.Comment: In Proceedings PROLE 2014, arXiv:1501.0169
Query Evaluation in Deductive Databases
It is desirable to answer queries posed to deductive databases by computing fixpoints because such computations are directly amenable to set-oriented fact processing. However, the classical fixpoint procedures based on bottom-up processing — the naive and semi-naive methods — are rather primitive and often inefficient. In this article, we rely on bottom-up meta-interpretation for formalizing a new fixpoint procedure that performs a different kind of reasoning: We specify a top-down query answering method, which we call the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Then, we reconsider query evaluation methods for recursive databases. First, we show that the methods based on rewriting on the one hand, and the methods based on resolution on the other hand, implement the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Second, we interpret the rewritings of the Alexander and Magic Set methods as specializations of the Backward Fixpoint Procedure. Finally, we argue that such a rewriting is also needed in a database context for implementing efficiently the resolution-based methods. Thus, the methods based on rewriting and the methods based on resolution implement the same top-down evaluation of the original database rules by means of auxiliary rules processed bottom-up
Experiences with Some Benchmarks for Deductive Databases and Implementations of Bottom-Up Evaluation
OpenRuleBench is a large benchmark suite for rule engines, which includes
deductive databases. We previously proposed a translation of Datalog to C++
based on a method that "pushes" derived tuples immediately to places where they
are used. In this paper, we report performance results of various
implementation variants of this method compared to XSB, YAP and DLV. We study
only a fraction of the OpenRuleBench problems, but we give a quite detailed
analysis of each such task and the factors which influence performance. The
results not only show the potential of our method and implementation approach,
but could be valuable for anybody implementing systems which should be able to
execute tasks of the discussed types.Comment: In Proceedings WLP'15/'16/WFLP'16, arXiv:1701.0014
- …