MTJ-Based Hardware Synapse Design for Quantized Deep Neural Networks

Quantized neural networks (QNNs) are being actively researched as a solution for the computational complexity and memory intensity of deep neural networks. This has sparked efforts to develop algorithms that support both inference and training with quantized weight and activation values without sacrificing accuracy. A recent example is the GXNOR framework for stochastic training of ternary and binary neural networks. In this paper, we introduce a novel hardware synapse circuit that uses magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) devices to support the GXNOR training. Our solution enables processing near memory (PNM) of QNNs, therefore can further reduce the data movements from and into the memory. We simulated MTJ-based stochastic training of a TNN over the MNIST and SVHN datasets and achieved an accuracy of 98.61% and 93.99%, respectively

Towards Efficient In-memory Computing Hardware for Quantized Neural Networks: State-of-the-art, Open Challenges and Perspectives

The amount of data processed in the cloud, the development of Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications, and growing data privacy concerns force the transition from cloud-based to edge-based processing. Limited energy and computational resources on edge push the transition from traditional von Neumann architectures to In-memory Computing (IMC), especially for machine learning and neural network applications. Network compression techniques are applied to implement a neural network on limited hardware resources. Quantization is one of the most efficient network compression techniques allowing to reduce the memory footprint, latency, and energy consumption. This paper provides a comprehensive review of IMC-based Quantized Neural Networks (QNN) and links software-based quantization approaches to IMC hardware implementation. Moreover, open challenges, QNN design requirements, recommendations, and perspectives along with an IMC-based QNN hardware roadmap are provided

에너지 효율적 인공신경망 설계

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 공과대학 전기·정보공학부, 2019. 2. 최기영.최근 심층 학습은 이미지 분류, 음성 인식 및 강화 학습과 같은 영역에서 놀라운 성과를 거두고 있다. 최첨단 심층 인공신경망 중 일부는 이미 인간의 능력을 넘어선 성능을 보여주고 있다. 그러나 인공신경망은 엄청난 수의 고정밀 계산과 수백만개의 매개 변수를 이용하기 위한 빈번한 메모리 액세스를 수반한다. 이는 엄청난 칩 공간과 에너지 소모 문제를 야기하여 임베디드 시스템에서 인공신경망이 사용되는 것을 제한하게 된다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 인공신경망을 높은 에너지 효율성을 갖도록 설계하는 방법을 제안한다. 첫번째 파트에서는 가중 스파이크를 이용하여 짧은 추론 시간과 적은 에너지 소모의 장점을 갖는 스파이킹 인공신경망 설계 방법을 다룬다. 스파이킹 인공신경망은 인공신경망의 높은 에너지 소비 문제를 극복하기 위한 유망한 대안 중 하나이다. 기존 연구에서 심층 인공신경망을 정확도 손실없이 스파이킹 인공신경망으로 변환하는 방법이 발표되었다. 그러나 기존의 방법들은 rate coding을 사용하기 때문에 긴 추론 시간을 갖게 되고 이것이 많은 에너지 소모를 야기하게 되는 단점이 있다. 이 파트에서는 페이즈에 따라 다른 스파이크 가중치를 부여하는 방법으로 추론 시간을 크게 줄이는 방법을 제안한다. MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 데이터셋에서의 실험 결과는 제안된 방법을 이용한 스파이킹 인공신경망이 기존 방법에 비해 큰 폭으로 추론 시간과 스파이크 발생 빈도를 줄여서 보다 에너지 효율적으로 동작함을 보여준다. 두번째 파트에서는 공정 변이가 있는 상황에서 동작하는 고에너지효율 아날로그 인공신경망 설계 방법을 다루고 있다. 인공신경망을 아날로그 회로를 사용하여 구현하면 높은 병렬성과 에너지 효율성을 얻을 수 있는 장점이 있다. 하지만, 아날로그 시스템은 노이즈에 취약한 중대한 결점을 가지고 있다. 이러한 노이즈 중 하나로 공정 변이를 들 수 있는데, 이는 아날로그 회로의 적정 동작 지점을 변화시켜 심각한 성능 저하 또는 오동작을 유발하는 원인이다. 이 파트에서는 ReRAM에 기반한 고에너지 효율 아날로그 이진 인공신경망을 구현하고, 공정 변이 문제를 해결하기 위해 활성도 일치 방법을 사용한 공정 변이 보상 기법을 제안한다. 제안된 인공신경망은 1T1R 구조의 ReRAM 배열과 차동증폭기를 이용한 뉴런을 이용하여 고밀도 집적과 고에너지 효율 동작이 가능하게 구성되었다. 또한, 아날로그 뉴런 회로의 공정 변이 취약성 문제를 해결하기 위해 이상적인 뉴런의 활성도와 동일한 활성도를 갖도록 뉴런의 바이어스를 조절하는 방법을 소개한다. 제안된 방법을 사용하여 32nm 공정에서 구현된 인공신경망은 3-sigma 지점에서 50% 문턱 전압 변이와 15%의 저항값 변이가 있는 상황에서도 MNIST에서 98.55%, CIFAR-10에서 89.63%의 정확도를 달성하였으며, 970 TOPS/W에 달하는 매우 높은 에너지 효율성을 달성하였다.Recently, deep learning has shown astounding performances on specific tasks such as image classification, speech recognition, and reinforcement learning. Some of the state-of-the-art deep neural networks have already gone over humans ability. However, neural networks involve tremendous number of high precision computations and frequent off-chip memory accesses with millions of parameters. It incurs problems of large area and exploding energy consumption, which hinder neural networks from being exploited in embedded systems. To cope with the problem, techniques for designing energy efficient neural networks are proposed. The first part of this dissertation addresses the design of spiking neural networks with weighted spikes which has advantages of shorter inference latency and smaller energy consumption compared to the conventional spiking neural networks. Spiking neural networks are being regarded as one of the promising alternative techniques to overcome the high energy costs of artificial neural networks. It is supported by many researches showing that a deep convolutional neural network can be converted into a spiking neural network with near zero accuracy loss. However, the advantage on energy consumption of spiking neural networks comes at a cost of long classification latency due to the use of Poisson-distributed spike trains (rate coding), especially in deep networks. We propose to use weighted spikes, which can greatly reduce the latency by assigning a different weight to a spike depending on which time phase it belongs. Experimental results on MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 show that the proposed spiking neural networks with weighted spikes achieve significant reduction in classification latency and number of spikes, which leads to faster and more energy-efficient spiking neural networks than the conventional spiking neural networks with rate coding. We also show that one of the state-of-the-art networks the deep residual network can be converted into spiking neural network without accuracy loss. The second part of this dissertation focuses on the design of highly energy-efficient analog neural networks in the presence of variations. Analog hardware accelerators for deep neural networks have taken center stage in the aspect of high parallelism and energy efficiency. However, a critical weakness of the analog hardware systems is vulnerability to noise. One of the biggest noise sources is a process variation. It is a big obstacle to using analog circuits since the variation shifts various parameters of analog circuits from the correct operating points, which causes severe performance degradation or even malfunction. To achieve high energy efficiency with analog neural networks, we propose resistive random access memory (ReRAM) based analog implementation of binarized neural networks (BNNs) with a novel variation compensation technique through activation matching (VCAM). The proposed architecture consists of 1-transistor-1-resistor (1T1R) structured ReRAM synaptic arrays and differential amplifier based neurons, which leads to high-density integration and energy efficiency. To cope with the vulnerability of analog neurons due to process variation, the biases of all neurons are adjusted in the direction that matches average output activation of ideal neurons without variation. The technique effectively restores the classification accuracy degraded by the variation. Experimental results on 32nm technology show that the proposed architecture achieves the classification accuracy of 98.55% on MNIST and 89.63% on CIFAR-10 in the presence of 50% threshold voltage variation and 15% resistance variation at 3-sigma point. It also achieves 970 TOPS/W energy efficiency with MLP on MNIST.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Deep Neural Networks with Weighted Spikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2 VCAM: Variation Compensation through Activation Matching for Analog Binarized Neural Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2 Background 8 2.1 Spiking neural network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Spiking neuron model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3 Rate coding in SNNs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.4 Binarized neural networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5 Resistive random access memory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3 RelatedWork 22 3.1 Training SNNs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.2 SNNs with various spike coding schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.3 BNN implementations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 4 Deep Neural Networks withWeighted Spikes 33 4.1 SNN with weighted spikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 4.1.1 Weighted spikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 4.1.2 Spiking neuron model for weighted spikes . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4.1.3 Noise spike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.1.4 Approximation of the ReLU activation . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4.1.5 ANN-to-SNN conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2 Optimization techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2.1 Skipping initial input currents in the output layer . . . . . . . 45 4.2.2 The number of phases in a period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.2.3 Accuracy-energy trade-off by early decision . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.2.4 Consideration on hardware implementation . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3 Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4.1 Comparison between SNN-RC and SNN-WS . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4.2 Trade-off by early decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.4.3 Comparison with other algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5 VCAM: Variation Compensation through Activation Matching for Analog Binarized Neural Networks 71 5.1 Modification of Binarized Neural Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.1.1 Binarized Neural Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.1.2 Use of 0 and 1 Activations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.1.3 Removal of Batch Normalization Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.2 Hardware Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.2.1 ReRAM Synaptic Array . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.2.2 Neuron Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 5.2.3 Issues with Neuron Circuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 5.3 Variation Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.3.1 Variation Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.3.2 Impact of VT Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.3.3 Variation Compensation Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.4 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4.1 Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4.2 Accuracy of the Modified BNN Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.4.3 Variation Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.4.4 Performance Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6 Conclusion 102Docto

Analog Content-Addressable Memory from Complementary FeFETs

To address the increasing computational demands of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data, compute-in-memory (CIM) integrates memory and processing units into the same physical location, reducing the time and energy overhead of the system. Despite advancements in non-volatile memory (NVM) for matrix multiplication, other critical data-intensive operations, like parallel search, have been overlooked. Current parallel search architectures, namely content-addressable memory (CAM), often use binary, which restricts density and functionality. We present an analog CAM (ACAM) cell, built on two complementary ferroelectric field-effect transistors (FeFETs), that performs parallel search in the analog domain with over 40 distinct match windows. We then deploy it to calculate similarity between vectors, a building block in the following two machine learning problems. ACAM outperforms ternary CAM (TCAM) when applied to similarity search for few-shot learning on the Omniglot dataset, yielding projected simulation results with improved inference accuracy by 5%, 3x denser memory architecture, and more than 100x faster speed compared to central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) per similarity search on scaled CMOS nodes. We also demonstrate 1-step inference on a kernel regression model by combining non-linear kernel computation and matrix multiplication in ACAM, with simulation estimates indicating 1,000x faster inference than CPU and GPU

2022 roadmap on neuromorphic computing and engineering

Modern computation based on von Neumann architecture is now a mature cutting-edge science. In the von Neumann architecture, processing and memory units are implemented as separate blocks interchanging data intensively and continuously. This data transfer is responsible for a large part of the power consumption. The next generation computer technology is expected to solve problems at the exascale with 10$^{18}$ calculations each second. Even though these future computers will be incredibly powerful, if they are based on von Neumann type architectures, they will consume between 20 and 30 megawatts of power and will not have intrinsic physically built-in capabilities to learn or deal with complex data as our brain does. These needs can be addressed by neuromorphic computing systems which are inspired by the biological concepts of the human brain. This new generation of computers has the potential to be used for the storage and processing of large amounts of digital information with much lower power consumption than conventional processors. Among their potential future applications, an important niche is moving the control from data centers to edge devices. The aim of this roadmap is to present a snapshot of the present state of neuromorphic technology and provide an opinion on the challenges and opportunities that the future holds in the major areas of neuromorphic technology, namely materials, devices, neuromorphic circuits, neuromorphic algorithms, applications, and ethics. The roadmap is a collection of perspectives where leading researchers in the neuromorphic community provide their own view about the current state and the future challenges for each research area. We hope that this roadmap will be a useful resource by providing a concise yet comprehensive introduction to readers outside this field, for those who are just entering the field, as well as providing future perspectives for those who are well established in the neuromorphic computing community