Visual SLAM for flying vehicles

The ability to learn a map of the environment is important for numerous types of robotic vehicles. In this paper, we address the problem of learning a visual map of the ground using flying vehicles. We assume that the vehicles are equipped with one or two low-cost downlooking cameras in combination with an attitude sensor. Our approach is able to construct a visual map that can later on be used for navigation. Key advantages of our approach are that it is comparably easy to implement, can robustly deal with noisy camera images, and can operate either with a monocular camera or a stereo camera system. Our technique uses visual features and estimates the correspondences between features using a variant of the progressive sample consensus (PROSAC) algorithm. This allows our approach to extract spatial constraints between camera poses that can then be used to address the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem by applying graph methods. Furthermore, we address the problem of efficiently identifying loop closures. We performed several experiments with flying vehicles that demonstrate that our method is able to construct maps of large outdoor and indoor environments. © 2008 IEEE

Vision-Based Localization Algorithm Based on Landmark Matching, Triangulation, Reconstruction, and Comparison

Many generic position-estimation algorithms are vulnerable to ambiguity introduced by nonunique landmarks. Also, the available high-dimensional image data is not fully used when these techniques are extended to vision-based localization. This paper presents the landmark matching, triangulation, reconstruction, and comparison (LTRC) global localization algorithm, which is reasonably immune to ambiguous landmark matches. It extracts natural landmarks for the (rough) matching stage before generating the list of possible position estimates through triangulation. Reconstruction and comparison then rank the possible estimates. The LTRC algorithm has been implemented using an interpreted language, onto a robot equipped with a panoramic vision system. Empirical data shows remarkable improvement in accuracy when compared with the established random sample consensus method. LTRC is also robust against inaccurate map data

Relational Reasoning Network (RRN) for Anatomical Landmarking

Accurately identifying anatomical landmarks is a crucial step in deformation analysis and surgical planning for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bones. Available methods require segmentation of the object of interest for precise landmarking. Unlike those, our purpose in this study is to perform anatomical landmarking using the inherent relation of CMF bones without explicitly segmenting them. We propose a new deep network architecture, called relational reasoning network (RRN), to accurately learn the local and the global relations of the landmarks. Specifically, we are interested in learning landmarks in CMF region: mandible, maxilla, and nasal bones. The proposed RRN works in an end-to-end manner, utilizing learned relations of the landmarks based on dense-block units and without the need for segmentation. For a given a few landmarks as input, the proposed system accurately and efficiently localizes the remaining landmarks on the aforementioned bones. For a comprehensive evaluation of RRN, we used cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 250 patients. The proposed system identifies the landmark locations very accurately even when there are severe pathologies or deformations in the bones. The proposed RRN has also revealed unique relationships among the landmarks that help us infer several reasoning about informativeness of the landmark points. RRN is invariant to order of landmarks and it allowed us to discover the optimal configurations (number and location) for landmarks to be localized within the object of interest (mandible) or nearby objects (maxilla and nasal). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first of its kind algorithm finding anatomical relations of the objects using deep learning.Comment: 10 pages, 6 Figures, 3 Table