73,760 research outputs found
Deepr: A Convolutional Net for Medical Records
Feature engineering remains a major bottleneck when creating predictive
systems from electronic medical records. At present, an important missing
element is detecting predictive regular clinical motifs from irregular episodic
records. We present Deepr (short for Deep record), a new end-to-end deep
learning system that learns to extract features from medical records and
predicts future risk automatically. Deepr transforms a record into a sequence
of discrete elements separated by coded time gaps and hospital transfers. On
top of the sequence is a convolutional neural net that detects and combines
predictive local clinical motifs to stratify the risk. Deepr permits
transparent inspection and visualization of its inner working. We validate
Deepr on hospital data to predict unplanned readmission after discharge. Deepr
achieves superior accuracy compared to traditional techniques, detects
meaningful clinical motifs, and uncovers the underlying structure of the
disease and intervention space
Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review
Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) are revolutionizing health-related research. One key issue for study quality is the accurate identification of patients with the condition of interest. Information in EMRs can be entered as structured codes or unstructured free text. The majority of research studies have used only coded parts of EMRs for case-detection, which may bias findings, miss cases, and reduce study quality. This review examines whether incorporating information from text into case-detection algorithms can improve research quality.
Methods: A systematic search returned 9659 papers, 67 of which reported on the extraction of information from free text of EMRs with the stated purpose of detecting cases of a named clinical condition. Methods for extracting information from text and the technical accuracy of case-detection algorithms were reviewed.
Results: Studies mainly used US hospital-based EMRs, and extracted information from text for 41 conditions using keyword searches, rule-based algorithms, and machine learning methods. There was no clear difference in case-detection algorithm accuracy between rule-based and machine learning methods of extraction. Inclusion of information from text resulted in a significant improvement in algorithm sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic in comparison to codes alone (median sensitivity 78% (codes + text) vs 62% (codes), P = .03; median area under the receiver operating characteristic 95% (codes + text) vs 88% (codes), P = .025).
Conclusions: Text in EMRs is accessible, especially with open source information extraction algorithms, and significantly improves case detection when combined with codes. More harmonization of reporting within EMR studies is needed, particularly standardized reporting of algorithm accuracy metrics like positive predictive value (precision) and sensitivity (recall)
Multimodal Machine Learning for Automated ICD Coding
This study presents a multimodal machine learning model to predict ICD-10
diagnostic codes. We developed separate machine learning models that can handle
data from different modalities, including unstructured text, semi-structured
text and structured tabular data. We further employed an ensemble method to
integrate all modality-specific models to generate ICD-10 codes. Key evidence
was also extracted to make our prediction more convincing and explainable. We
used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC -III) dataset
to validate our approach. For ICD code prediction, our best-performing model
(micro-F1 = 0.7633, micro-AUC = 0.9541) significantly outperforms other
baseline models including TF-IDF (micro-F1 = 0.6721, micro-AUC = 0.7879) and
Text-CNN model (micro-F1 = 0.6569, micro-AUC = 0.9235). For interpretability,
our approach achieves a Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) of 0.1806 on text
data and 0.3105 on tabular data, where well-trained physicians achieve 0.2780
and 0.5002 respectively.Comment: Machine Learning for Healthcare 201
- …