11,302 research outputs found

    Least squares-based iterative identification methods for linear-in-parameters systems using the decomposition technique

    Get PDF
    By extending the least squares-based iterative (LSI) method, this paper presents a decomposition-based LSI (D-LSI) algorithm for identifying linear-in-parameters systems and an interval-varying D-LSI algorithm for handling the identification problems of missing-data systems. The basic idea is to apply the hierarchical identification principle to decompose the original system into two fictitious sub-systems and then to derive new iterative algorithms to estimate the parameters of each sub-system. Compared with the LSI algorithm and the interval-varying LSI algorithm, the decomposition-based iterative algorithms have less computational load. The numerical simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithms work quite well

    Networked Control System Design and Parameter Estimation

    Get PDF
    Networked control systems (NCSs) are a kind of distributed control systems in which the data between control components are exchanged via communication networks. Because of the attractive advantages of NCSs such as reduced system wiring, low weight, and ease of system diagnosis and maintenance, the research on NCSs has received much attention in recent years. The first part (Chapter 2 - Chapter 4) of the thesis is devoted to designing new controllers for NCSs by incorporating the network-induced delays. The thesis also conducts research on filtering of multirate systems and identification of Hammerstein systems in the second part (Chapter 5 - Chapter 6). Network-induced delays exist in both sensor-to-controller (S-C) and controller-to-actuator (C-A) links. A novel two-mode-dependent control scheme is proposed, in which the to-be-designed controller depends on both S-C and C-A delays. The resulting closed-loop system is a special jump linear system. Then, the conditions for stochastic stability are obtained in terms of a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) with nonconvex constraints, which can be efficiently solved by a sequential LMI optimization algorithm. Further, the control synthesis problem for the NCSs is considered. The definitions of Hโ‚‚ and Hโˆž norms for the special system are first proposed. Also, the plant uncertainties are considered in the design. Finally, the robust mixed Hโ‚‚/Hโˆž control problem is solved under the framework of LMIs. To compensate for both S-C and C-A delays modeled by Markov chains, the generalized predictive control method is modified to choose certain predicted future control signal as the current control effort on the actuator node, whenever the control signal is delayed. Further, stability criteria in terms of LMIs are provided to check the system stability. The proposed method is also tested on an experimental hydraulic position control system. Multirate systems exist in many practical applications where different sampling rates co-exist in the same system. The lโ‚‚-lโˆž filtering problem for multirate systems is considered in the thesis. By using the lifting technique, the system is first transformed to a linear time-invariant one, and then the filter design is formulated as an optimization problem which can be solved by using LMI techniques. Hammerstein model consists of a static nonlinear block followed in series by a linear dynamic system, which can find many applications in different areas. New switching sequences to handle the two-segment nonlinearities are proposed in this thesis. This leads to less parameters to be estimated and thus reduces the computational cost. Further, a stochastic gradient algorithm based on the idea of replacing the unmeasurable terms with their estimates is developed to identify the Hammerstein model with two-segment nonlinearities. Finally, several open problems are listed as the future research directions

    A classification of techniques for the compensation of time delayed processes. Part 2: Structurally optimised controllers

    Get PDF
    Following on from Part 1, Part 2 of the paper considers the use of structurally optimised controllers to compensate time delayed processes

    A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5This paper presents a Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer (NUPO) based control approach in order to deal with two of the main problems related to Networked Control Systems (NCS) or Sensor Networks (SN): time-varying delays and packet loss. In addition, if these delays are longer than the sampling period, the packet disordering phenomenon can appear. Due to these issues, a (scarce) nonuniform, delayed measurement signal could be received by the controller. But including the NUPO proposal in the control system, the delay will be compensated by the prediction stage, and the nonavailable data will be reconstructed by the observer stage. So, a delay-free, uniformly sampled controller design can be adopted. To ensure stability, the predictor must satisfy a feasibility problem based on a time-varying delay-dependent condition expressed in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI). Some aspects like the relation between network delay and robustness/performance trade-off are empirically studied. A simulation example shows the benefits (robustness and control performance improvement) of the NUPO approach by comparison to another similar proposal. ยฉ ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2011.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia Projects DPI2008-06737-C02-01 and DPI2009-14744-C03-03, by Generalitat Valenciana Project GV/2010/018, by Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Project PAID06-08.Cuenca Lacruz, รM.; Garcรญa Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pรฉrez, P.; Salt Llobregat, JJ. (2011). A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems. 9(6):1194-1202. doi:10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5S1194120296K. Ogata, Discrete-time Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1987.Y. Tipsuwan and M. Chow, โ€œControl methodologies in networked control systems,โ€ Control Eng. Practice, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1099โ€“1111, 2003.T. Jia, Y. Niu, and X. Wang, โ€œH โˆž control for networked systems with data packet dropout,โ€ Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198โ€“203, 2010.Y. Wang and G. Yang, โ€œRobust H โˆž model reference tracking control for networked control systems with communication constraints,โ€ Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 992โ€“1000, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, โ€œNetwork-based H โˆž output tracking control,โ€ IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655โ€“667, 2008.H. Karimi, โ€œRobust H โˆž filter design for uncertain linear systems over network with network-induced delays and output quantization,โ€ Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27โ€“37, 2009.H. R. Karimi, โ€œDelay-range-dependent linear matrix inequality approach to quantized H โˆž control of linear systems with network-induced delays and norm-bounded uncertainties,โ€ Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part I: J. of Syst. and Control Eng., vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 689โ€“700, 2010.K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Lee, โ€œRemote fuzzy logic control of networked control system via Profibus-DP,โ€ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 784โ€“792, 2003.Y. Tipsuwan and M.-Y. Chow, โ€œGain scheduler middleware: a methodology to enable existing controllers for networked control and teleoperationpart I: networked Control,โ€ IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1218โ€“1227, December 2004.A. Sala, A. Cuenca, and J. Salt, โ€œA retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system,โ€ Inform. Sci., vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2390โ€“2402, June 2009.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, V. Casanova, and R. Piza, โ€œAn approach based on an adaptive multi-rate Smith predictor and gain scheduling for a networked control system: implementation over Profibus-DP,โ€ Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 473โ€“481, April 2010.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, A. Sala, and R. Piza, โ€œA delay-dependent dual-rate PID controller over an Ethernet network,โ€ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18โ€“29, Feb. 2011.Y. Tian and D. Levy, โ€œCompensation for control packet dropout in networked control systems,โ€ Inform. Sci., vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1263โ€“1278, 2008.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, โ€œModeling and stabilization of continuous-time packet-based networked control systems.โ€ IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1646โ€“1652, Dec. 2009.X. Zhao, S. Fei, and C. Sun, โ€œImpulsive controller design for singular networked control systems with packet dropouts,โ€ Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1020โ€“1025, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, โ€œH โˆž estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity,โ€ IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2070โ€“2084, 2007.S. Oh, L. Schenato, P. Chen, and S. Sastry, โ€œTracking and coordination of multiple agents using sensor networks: System design, algorithms and experiments,โ€ Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 234โ€“254, 2007.M. Moayedi, Y. Foo, and Y. Soh, โ€œOptimal and suboptimal minimum-variance filtering in networked systems with mixed uncertainties of random sensor delays, packet dropouts and missing measurements,โ€ Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1179โ€“1188, 2010.W. Zhang, M. Branicky, and S. Phillips, โ€œStability of networked control systems,โ€ IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 84โ€“99, 2001.J. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi, and Y. Xu, โ€œA survey of recent results in networked control systems,โ€ Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 138โ€“162, 2007.J. Baillieul and P. Antsaklis, โ€œControl and communication challenges in networked real-time systems,โ€ Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 9โ€“28, 2007.P. Garcia, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, โ€œRobustness with respect to delay uncertainties of a predictor-observer based discrete-time controller,โ€ Proc. of the 45th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 199โ€“204, 2006.C. Lien, โ€œRobust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach,โ€ IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1365โ€“1370, 2004.A. Sala, โ€œComputer control under time-varying sampling period: an LMI gridding approach,โ€ Automatica, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2077โ€“2082, Dec. 2005.J. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. Cai, โ€œH โˆž control of networked control systems with packet disordering,โ€ IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1463โ€“1475, March 2009.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, โ€œImproved predictive control approach to networked control systems,โ€ IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 675โ€“681, Aug. 2008.K. Astrom, โ€œEvent based control,โ€ Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, pp. 127โ€“147, 2007.A. Cuenca, P. Garcรญa, K. Arzรฉn, and P. Albertos, โ€œA predictor-observer for a networked control system with time-varying delays and non-uniform sampling,โ€ Proc. Eur. Control Conf., pp. 946โ€“951, 2009.J. Xiong and J. Lam, โ€œStabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss,โ€ Automatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 80โ€“87, 2007.H. Song, L. Yu, and A. Liu, โ€œH โˆž filtering for network-based systems with communication constraints and packet dropouts,โ€ Proc. of the 7th Asian Control Conf., pp. 220โ€“225, 2009.P. Garcia, A. Gonzalez, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, โ€œRobustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay,โ€ Proc. of the 9th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, 2010.J. Sturm, โ€œUsing SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,โ€ Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 625โ€“653, 1999.T. Henningsson and K. Astrom, โ€œLog-concave observers,โ€ Proc. of the 17th Int. Symp. on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, pp. 2163โ€“2170, 2006.D. Davison and E. Hwang, โ€œAutomating radiotherapy cancer treatment: use of multirate observer-based control,โ€ Proc. of American Control Conf., vol. 2, pp. 1194โ€“1199, 2003

    State-space self-tuner for on-line adaptive control

    Get PDF
    Dynamic systems, such as flight vehicles, satellites and space stations, operating in real environments, constantly face parameter and/or structural variations owing to nonlinear behavior of actuators, failure of sensors, changes in operating conditions, disturbances acting on the system, etc. In the past three decades, adaptive control has been shown to be effective in dealing with dynamic systems in the presence of parameter uncertainties, structural perturbations, random disturbances and environmental variations. Among the existing adaptive control methodologies, the state-space self-tuning control methods, initially proposed by us, are shown to be effective in designing advanced adaptive controllers for multivariable systems. In our approaches, we have embedded the standard Kalman state-estimation algorithm into an online parameter estimation algorithm. Thus, the advanced state-feedback controllers can be easily established for digital adaptive control of continuous-time stochastic multivariable systems. A state-space self-tuner for a general multivariable stochastic system has been developed and successfully applied to the space station for on-line adaptive control. Also, a technique for multistage design of an optimal momentum management controller for the space station has been developed and reported in. Moreover, we have successfully developed various digital redesign techniques which can convert a continuous-time controller to an equivalent digital controller. As a result, the expensive and unreliable continuous-time controller can be implemented using low-cost and high performance microprocessors. Recently, we have developed a new hybrid state-space self tuner using a new dual-rate sampling scheme for on-line adaptive control of continuous-time uncertain systems

    ์ง€๋„ ๋ฐ ๋น„์ง€๋„ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋จธ๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๊ฐ์ง€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ๋ฐ•์ข…์šฐ.์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ ๊ณต์œ ๋œ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋™์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜‘์—… ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋จธ๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ๋‚ ์นด๋กœ์šด ์ถฉ๋Œ(๊ฒฝ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ)์—์„œ ๋” ๊ธด ์ง€์† ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ฐ€๊ณ  ๋‹น๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋™์ž‘(์—ฐ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ)์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ธฐ๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ธํŠธ ํ† ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ์‹๋ณ„๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋งค์šฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋™์—ญํ•™๊ณผ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์„ ์ˆ˜๋™์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์—๋Š” ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ์ด๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์‹๋ณ„ ํ›„์—๋„ ๋™์—ญํ•™์— ๋ฐฑ๋ž˜์‹œ, ํƒ„์„ฑ ๋“ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํšจ๊ณผ๋‚˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์กด์žฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ตฌํ˜„ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ํ”ผํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋™์—ญํ•™์  ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋จธ๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ด ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฐ ๋น„์ถฉ๋Œ ๋™์ž‘ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ง€๋„ ํ•™์Šต ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(์„œํฌํŠธ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ๋จธ์‹  ํšŒ๊ท€, ์ผ์ฐจ์› ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋น„์ถฉ๋Œ ๋™์ž‘ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋„ ์ด์ƒ์น˜ ํƒ์ง€ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜(๋‹จ์ผ ํด๋ž˜์Šค ์„œํฌํŠธ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ๋จธ์‹ , ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋” ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜)์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋™์—ญํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’๋งŒ์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์„ผ์„œ๋‚˜ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋™ ์กฐ์ •์€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์ง€๋„ ๋ฐ ๋น„์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ•™์Šต์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š”, 6์ž์œ ๋„ ํ˜‘์—… ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋จธ๋‹ˆํ“ฐ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์ถฉ๋Œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ์ถฉ๋Œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ, ์—ฐ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ, ๋น„์ถฉ๋Œ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ, ๊ฒฝ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋™์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถฉ๋Œ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์ด 787๊ฑด์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ๊ณผ 62.4๋ถ„์˜ ๋น„์ถฉ๋Œ ๋™์ž‘์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๋žœ๋ค ์ ๋Œ€์  6๊ด€์ ˆ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ์ค‘ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋๋‹จ์—๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ถ€์ฐฉ, 3.3 kg, 5.0 kg์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํŽ˜์ด๋กœ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๋ถ€์ฐฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐ€๋ฒผ์šด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ธก์ • ๋…ธ์ด์ฆˆ, ๋ฐฑ๋ž˜์‹œ, ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋“ฑ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํšจ๊ณผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ณด์ƒ๋จ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์„œํฌํŠธ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ๋จธ์‹  ํšŒ๊ท€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์ •๋งŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ผ์ฐจ์› ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์•„์›ƒํ’‹ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์ •๋งŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ๋ฐ, ๋‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ง๊ด€์ ์ธ ๊ฐ๋„ ์กฐ์ •์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์‹คํ—˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋™์ผํ•œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋น„์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ€๋ฒผ์šด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์ •๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ์‹ค์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ๋™์—ญํ•™์  ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„์ง€๋„ ํ•™์Šต์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ณด์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๊ฐ์ง€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋น„์ง€๋„ ๊ฐ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋น„์ถฉ๋Œ ๋™์ž‘ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋งŒ์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ถฉ๋Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€๋Ÿ‰ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋˜๋Š” ์‚ฐ์—…์šฉ ๋กœ๋ด‡์— ๋” ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค.Collaborative robot manipulators operating in dynamic and unstructured environments shared with humans require fast and accurate detection of collisions, which can range from sharp impacts (hard collisions) to pulling and pushing motions of longer duration (soft collisions). When using dynamics model-based detection methods that estimate the external joint torque with motor current measurements, proper treatment for friction in the motors is required, such as accurate modeling and identification of friction parameters. Although highly effective when done correctly, modeling and identifying the dynamics and friction parameters, and manually setting multiple detection thresholds require considerable effort, making them difficult to be replicated for mass-produced industrial robots. There may also still exist unmodeled effects or uncertainties in the dynamics even after proper identification, e.g., backlash, elasticity. This dissertation presents a total of four learning-based collision detection methods for robot manipulators as a means of sidestepping some of the implementation difficulties of pure model-based methods and compensating for uncertain dynamic effects. Two methods use supervised learning algorithms โ€“ support vector machine regression and a one-dimensional convolutional neural network-based โ€“ that require both the collision and collision-free motion data for training. The other two methods are based on unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms โ€“ a one-class support vector machine and an autoencoder-based โ€“ that require only the collision-free motion data for training. Only the motor current measurements together with a robot dynamics model are required while no additional external sensors, friction modeling, or manual tuning of multiple detection thresholds are needed. We first describe the robot collision dataset collected with a six-dof collaborative robot manipulator, which is used for training and validating our supervised and unsupervised detection methods. The collision scenarios we consider are hard collisions, soft collisions, and collision-free, where both hard and soft collisions are treated in the same manner as just collisions. The test dataset for detection performance verification includes a total of 787 collisions and 62.4 minutes of collision-free motions, all collected while the robot is executing random point-to-point six-joint motions. During data collection, three types of payloads are attached to the end-effector: no payload, 3.3 kg payload, and 5.0 kg payload. Then the detection performance of our supervised detection methods is experimentally verified with the collected test dataset. Results demonstrate that our supervised detection methods can accurately detect a wide range of hard and soft collisions in real-time using a light network, compensating for uncertainties in the model parameters as well as unmodeled effects like friction, measurement noise, backlash, and deformations. Moreover, the SVMR-based method requires only one constant detection threshold to be tuned while the 1-D CNN-based method requires only one output filter parameter to be tuned, both of which allow intuitive sensitivity tuning. Furthermore, the generalization capability of our supervised detection methods is experimentally verified with a set of simulation experiments. Finally, our unsupervised detection methods are also validated for the same test dataset; the detection performance and the generalization capability are verified. The experimental results show that our unsupervised detection methods are also able to robustly detect a variety of hard and soft collisions in real-time with very light computation and with only one constant detection threshold required to be tuned, validating that uncertain dynamic effects including the unmodeled friction can be successfully compensated also with unsupervised learning. Although our supervised detection methods show better detection performance, our unsupervised detection methods are more practical for mass-produced industrial robots since they require only the data for collision-free motions for training, and the knowledge of every possible type of collision that can occur is not required.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Model-Free Methods 2 1.2 Model-Based Methods 2 1.3 Learning-Based Methods 4 1.3.1 Using Supervised Learning Algorithms 5 1.3.2 Using Unsupervised Learning Algorithms 6 1.4 Contributions of This Dissertation 7 1.4.1 Supervised Learning-Based Model-Compensating Detection 7 1.4.2 Unsupervised Learning-Based Model-Compensating Detection 8 1.4.3 Comparison with Existing Detection Methods 9 1.5 Organization of This Dissertation 14 2 Preliminaries 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 Robot Dynamics 17 2.3 Momentum Observer-Based Collision Detection 19 2.4 Supervised Learning Algorithms 21 2.4.1 Support Vector Machine Regression 21 2.4.2 One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network 23 2.5 Unsupervised Anomaly Detection 25 2.6 One-Class Support Vector Machine 26 2.7 Autoencoder-Based Anomaly Detection 28 2.7.1 Autoencoder Network Architecture and Training 28 2.7.2 Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders 29 3 Robot Collision Data 31 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 True Collision Index Labeling 31 3.3 Collision Scenarios 35 3.4 Monitoring Signal 36 3.5 Signal Normalization and Sampling 37 3.6 Test Data for Detection Performance Verification 39 4 Supervised Learning-Based Model-Compensating Detection 43 4.1 Introduction 43 4.2 SVMR-Based Collision Detection 44 4.2.1 Input Feature Vector Design 44 4.2.2 SVMR Training 45 4.2.3 Collision Detection Sensitivity Adjustment 46 4.3 1-D CNN-Based Collision Detection 50 4.3.1 Network Input Design 50 4.3.2 Network Architecture and Training 50 4.3.3 An Output Filtering Method to Reduce False Alarms 53 4.4 Collision Detection Performance Criteria 54 4.4.1 Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (PRAUC) 54 4.4.2 Detection Delay and Number of Detection Failures 54 4.5 Collision Detection Performance Analysis 56 4.5.1 Global Performance with Varying Thresholds 56 4.5.2 Detection Delay and Number of Detection Failures 57 4.5.3 Real-Time Inference 60 4.6 Generalization Capability Analysis 60 4.6.1 Generalization to Small Perturbations 60 4.6.2 Generalization to an Unseen Payload 62 5 Unsupervised Learning-Based Model-Compensating Detection 67 5.1 Introduction 67 5.2 OC-SVM-Based Collision Detection 68 5.2.1 Input Feature Vector 68 5.2.2 OC-SVM Training 70 5.2.3 Collision Detection with the Trained OC-SVM 70 5.3 Autoencoder-Based Collision Detection 70 5.3.1 Network Input and Output 71 5.3.2 Network Architecture and Training 71 5.3.3 Collision Detection with the Trained Autoencoder 72 5.4 Collision Detection Performance Analysis 74 5.4.1 Global Performance with Varying Thresholds 75 5.4.2 Detection Delay and Number of Detection Failures 75 5.4.3 Comparison with Supervised Learning-Based Methods 80 5.4.4 Real-Time Inference 83 5.5 Generalization Capability Analysis 83 5.5.1 Generalization to Small Perturbations 84 5.5.2 Generalization to an Unseen Payload 85 6 Conclusion 89 6.1 Summary and Discussion 89 6.2 Future Work 93 A Appendix 95 A.1 SVM-Based Classification of Detected Collisions 95 A.2 Direct Estimation-Based Detection Methods 97 A.3 Model-Independent Supervised Detection Methods 101 A.4 Generalization to Large Changes in the Dynamics Model 102 Bibliography 106 Abstract 112๋ฐ•

    Modeling, identification, estimation and adaptation for the control of power-generating kites

    Get PDF
    Large-scale kites, flying high-force crosswind trajectories, have been proposed for wind power generation. A two phase operational cycle generates net positive power using a ground-based motor/generator. In the traction phase the kite flies a high-force trajectory while reeling out the generator-connected tethers. A low-force retraction phase reels in the tethers and returns the kite to the start of the cycle. Highly variable conditions and significant uncertainty in the dynamics pose challenges to autonomous, well-controlled flight. The control task is divided into trajectory generation and tracking components and the most uncertain parameters in the model are identified online. The control structure uses these parameters in a robust framework resulting in an experimentally verified adaptive control scheme

    Combined state and parameter estimation for Hammerstein systems with time-delay using the Kalman filtering

    Get PDF
    This paper discusses the state and parameter estimation problem for a class of Hammerstein state space systems with time-delay. Both the process noise and the measurement noise are considered in the system. Based on the observable canonical state space form and the key term separation, a pseudo-linear regressive identification model is obtained. For the unknown states in the information vector, the Kalman filter is used to search for the optimal state estimates. A Kalman-filter based least squares iterative and a recursive least squares algorithms are proposed. Extending the information vector to include the latest information terms which are missed for the time-delay, the Kalman-filter based recursive extended least squares algorithm is derived to obtain the estimates of the unknown time-delay, parameters and states. The numerical simulation results are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms

    Optimized state feedback regulation of 3DOF helicopter system via extremum seeking

    Get PDF
    In this paper, an optimized state feedback regulation of a 3 degree of freedom (DOF) helicopter is designed via extremum seeking (ES) technique. Multi-parameter ES is applied to optimize the tracking performance via tuning State Vector Feedback with Integration of the Control Error (SVFBICE). Discrete multivariable version of ES is developed to minimize a cost function that measures the performance of the controller. The cost function is a function of the error between the actual and desired axis positions. The controller parameters are updated online as the optimization takes place. This method significantly decreases the time in obtaining optimal controller parameters. Simulations were conducted for the online optimization under both fixed and varying operating conditions. The results demonstrate the usefulness of using ES for preserving the maximum attainable performance

    State estimation, system identification and adaptive control for networked systems

    Get PDF
    A networked control system (NCS) is a feedback control system that has its control loop physically connected via real-time communication networks. To meet the demands of `teleautomation', modularity, integrated diagnostics, quick maintenance and decentralization of control, NCSs have received remarkable attention worldwide during the past decade. Yet despite their distinct advantages, NCSs are suffering from network-induced constraints such as time delays and packet dropouts, which may degrade system performance. Therefore, the network-induced constraints should be incorporated into the control design and related studies. For the problem of state estimation in a network environment, we present the strategy of simultaneous input and state estimation to compensate for the effects of unknown input missing. A sub-optimal algorithm is proposed, and the stability properties are proven by analyzing the solution of a Riccati-like equation. Despite its importance, system identification in a network environment has been studied poorly before. To identify the parameters of a system in a network environment, we modify the classical Kalman filter to obtain an algorithm that is capable of handling missing output data caused by the network medium. Convergence properties of the algorithm are established under the stochastic framework. We further develop an adaptive control scheme for networked systems. By employing the proposed output estimator and parameter estimator, the designed adaptive control can track the expected signal. Rigorous convergence analysis of the scheme is performed under the stochastic framework as well
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore