Epilepsy

With the vision of including authors from different parts of the world, different educational backgrounds, and offering open-access to their published work, InTech proudly presents the latest edited book in epilepsy research, Epilepsy: Histological, electroencephalographic, and psychological aspects. Here are twelve interesting and inspiring chapters dealing with basic molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying epileptic seizures, electroencephalographic findings, and neuropsychological, psychological, and psychiatric aspects of epileptic seizures, but non-epileptic as well

Graph neural networks for seizure discrimination based on electroencephalogram analysis

Este estudio presenta una investigación sobre la clasificación de Convulsiones Psicógenas No Epilépticas (PNES) y Convulsiones Epilépticas (ES) utilizando datos de EEG y Redes Neuronales de Grafos (GNN). El modelo propuesto muestra un rendimiento destacable, superando los resultados previos del estado del arte y logrando una precisión notable en la clasificación ternaria. Mediante el uso de una arquitectura GNN, el modelo distingue de manera efectiva entre PNES y ES con una precisión del 92.9%. Además, al emplear la validación cruzada "Leave One Group Out", el modelo logra una precisión aún mayor del 97.58%, superando la precisión más alta reportada en el estado del arte de 94.4%. Asimismo, al ampliar la clasificación para incluir a pacientes sanos, el modelo alcanza una precisión del 91.12%, superando la mejor precisión conocida del estado del arte de 85.7%. Estos hallazgos resaltan el potencial del modelo para clasificar y diferenciar de manera precisa estas condiciones médicas utilizando datos de EEG. El trabajo futuro incluye la exploración de biomarcadores para la clasificación binaria utilizando las capacidades de explicabilidad del modelo, contribuyendo al desarrollo de herramientas de diagnóstico objetivas y estrategias de tratamiento personalizadas. Además, este estudio compara el rendimiento, las metodologías y los conjuntos de datos de estudios similares del estado del arte, proporcionando una visión general completa de la investigación en clasificación de convulsiones. En conclusión, este estudio demuestra el éxito del modelo propuesto en la clasificación de PNES y ES, allanando el camino para futuros avances en el campo y beneficiando a pacientes y profesionales de la salud en el diagnóstico y tratamiento.This study presents a research investigation on the classification of Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) and Epileptic Seizures (ES) using EEG data and Graph Neural Networks (GNN). The proposed model demonstrates outstanding performance, surpassing previous state-of-the-art results and achieving remarkable accuracy in ternary classification. By utilizing a GNN architecture, the model effectively distinguishes between PNES and ES with an accuracy of 92.9%. Moreover, when employing Leave One Group Out crossvalidation, the model achieves an even higher accuracy of 97.58%, outperforming the highest reported state-of-the-art accuracy of 94.4%. Furthermore, by extending the classification to include healthy patients, the model achieves an accuracy of 91.12%, surpassing the bestknown state-of-the-art accuracy of 85.7%. These findings highlight the potential of the model in accurately classifying and differentiating these medical conditions using EEG data. Future work includes the exploration of biomarkers for binary classification using the model's explainability capabilities, contributing to the development of objective diagnostic tools and personalized treatment strategies. Additionally, this study compares the performance, methodologies, and datasets of similar studies from the state-of-the-art, providing a comprehensive overview of seizure classification research. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the success of the proposed model in classifying PNES and ES, paving the way for further advancements in the field and benefiting patients and healthcare practitioners in diagnosis and treatment

Effects of Diversity and Neuropsychological Performance in an NFL Cohort

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of ethnicity on neuropsychological test performance by comparing scores of white and black former NFL athletes on each subtest of the WMS. Participants and Methods: Data was derived from a de-identified database in South Florida consisting of 63 former NFL white (n=28, 44.4%) and black (n=35, 55.6%) athletes (Mage= 50.38; SD= 11.57). Participants completed the following subtests of the WMS: Logical Memory I and II, Verbal Paired Associates I and II, and Visual Reproduction I and II. Results: A One-Way ANOVA yielded significant effect between ethnicity and performance on several subtests from the WMS-IV. Black athletes had significantly lower scores compared to white athletes on Logical Memory II: F(1,61) = 4.667, p= .035, Verbal Paired Associates I: F(1,61) = 4.536, p = .037, Verbal Paired Associates: II F(1,61) = 4.677, p = .034, and Visual Reproduction I: F(1,61) = 6.562, p = .013. Conclusions: Results suggest significant differences exist between white and black athletes on neuropsychological test performance, necessitating the need for proper normative samples for each ethnic group. It is possible the differences found can be explained by the psychometric properties of the assessment and possibility of a non-representative sample for minorities, or simply individual differences. Previous literature has found white individuals to outperform African-Americans on verbal and non-verbal cognitive tasks after controlling for socioeconomic and other demographic variables (Manly & Jacobs, 2002). This highlights the need for future investigators to identify cultural factors and evaluate how ethnicity specifically plays a role on neuropsychological test performance. Notably, differences between ethnic groups can have significant implications when evaluating a sample of former athletes for cognitive impairment, as these results suggest retired NFL minorities may be more impaired compared to retired NFL white athletes

Distinguishing Performance on Tests of Executive Functions Between Those with Depression and Anxiety

Objective: To see if there are differences in executive functions between those diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and those with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).Participants and Methods: The data were chosen from a de-identified database at a neuropsychological clinic in South Florida. The sample used was adults diagnosed with MDD (n=75) and GAD (n=71) and who had taken the Halstead Category Test, Trail Making Test, Stroop Test, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Age (M=32.97, SD=11.75), gender (56.7% female), and race (52.7% White) did not differ between groups. IQ did not differ but education did (MDD=13.41 years, SD=2.45; GAD=15.11 years, SD=2.40), so it was ran as a covariate in the analyses. Six ANCOVAs were run separately with diagnosis being held as the fixed factor and executive function test scores held as dependent variables. Results: The MDD group only performed worse on the Category Test than the GAD group ([1,132]=4.022, p\u3c .05). Even though both WCST scores used were significantly different between the two groups, both analyses failed Levene’s test of Equality of Error Variances, so the data were not interpreted. Conclusions: Due to previous findings that those diagnosed with MDD perform worse on tests of executive function than normal controls (Veiel, 1997), this study wanted to compare executive function performance between those diagnosed with MDD and those with another common psychological disorder. The fact that these two groups only differed on the Category Test shows that there may not be much of a difference in executive function deficits between those with MDD and GAD. That being said, not being able to interpret the scores on the WCST test due to a lack of homogeneity of variance indicates that a larger sample size is needed to compare these two types of patients, as significant differences may be found. The results of this specific study, however, could mean that the Category Test could be used in assisting the diagnosis of a MDD patient

The Effect of Ethnicity on Neuropsychological Test Performance of Former NFL Athletes

Objective: To investigate the effect of ethnicity on neuropsychological test performance by specifically exploring differences between white and black former NFL athletes on subtests of the WAIS-IV. Participants and Methods: Data was derived from a de-identified database in Florida consisting of 63 former NFL athletes (Mage=50.38; SD=11.57); 28 white and 35 black. Participants completed the following subtests of the WAIS-IV: Block Design, Similarities, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, Arithmetic, Symbol Search, Visual Puzzles, Coding, and Cancellation. Results: One-Way ANOVA yielded a significant effect between ethnicity and performance on several subtests. Black athletes had significantly lower scaled scores than white athletes on Block Design F(1,61)=14.266, p\u3c.001, Similarities F(1,61)=5.904, p=.018, Digit Span F(1,61)=8.985, p=.004, Arithmetic F(1,61)=16.07, p\u3c.001 and Visual Puzzles F(1,61)=16.682, p\u3c .001. No effect of ethnicity was seen on performance of Matrix Reasoning F(1,61)=2.937, p=.092, Symbol Search F(1,61)=3.619, p=.062, Coding F(1,61)=3.032, p=.087 or Cancellation F(1,61)=2.289, p=.136. Conclusions: Results reveal significant differences between white and black athletes on all subtests of the WAIS-IV but those from the Processing Speed Scale and Matrix Reasoning. These findings align with previous literature that found white individuals to outperform African-Americans on verbal and non-verbal tasks after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables (Manly & Jacobs, 2002). These differences may also be a reflection of the WAIS-IV’s psychometric properties and it is significant to consider the normative sample used may not be appropriate for African-Americans. This study highlights the need for future research to identify how ethnicity specifically influences performance, sheds light on the importance of considering cultural factors when interpreting test results, and serves as a call to action to further understand how and why minorities may not be accurately represented in neuropsychological testing

Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Patterns in Children vs. Adults with ADHD Combined and Inattentive Types: A SPECT Study

Objective: The current study sought to determine whether ADHD Combined Type (ADHD-C) and ADHD Primarily Inattentive Type (ADHD-PI) showed differential regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) patterns in children vs. adults. Participants and Methods: The overall sample (N=1484) was effectively split into four groups: adults with ADHD-PI (n=519), adults with ADHD-C (n=405), children with ADHD-PI (n=192), children with ADHD-C (n=368). All participants were void of bipolar, schizophrenia, autism, neurocognitive disorders, and TBI. The data were collected from a de-identified archival database of individuals who underwent SPECT scans at rest. Results: Using αConclusions: Overall, the current study suggested that children may show rCBF differences between different ADHD subtypes, but adults may not. The current study did not find significance in any of the 17 brain regions examined when comparing adults with ADHD-C to adults with ADHD-PI. All significant findings were attributed to the children with ADHD-C group showing aberrant blood flow rate than at least one other group. Previous research has supported that the differentiation of these subtypes as distinctive disorders is difficult to make in adults (Sobanski et al., 2006). Other research has indicated the potential of imaging techniques to differentiate the two in children (Al-Amin, Zinchenko, & Geyer, 2018). The current findings support nuanced ways in which rCBF patterns of ADHD-C and ADHD-PI differ between children and adults