Improving Malware Detection Accuracy by Extracting Icon Information

Detecting PE malware files is now commonly approached using statistical and machine learning models. While these models commonly use features extracted from the structure of PE files, we propose that icons from these files can also help better predict malware. We propose an innovative machine learning approach to extract information from icons. Our proposed approach consists of two steps: 1) extracting icon features using summary statics, histogram of gradients (HOG), and a convolutional autoencoder, 2) clustering icons based on the extracted icon features. Using publicly available data and by using machine learning experiments, we show our proposed icon clusters significantly boost the efficacy of malware prediction models. In particular, our experiments show an average accuracy increase of 10% when icon clusters are used in the prediction model.Comment: Full version. IEEE MIPR 201

Iconic memory of icon?

The objectives of the present commentary are to show that (1) one important theoretical property of iconic memory is inconsistent with a retinotopic icon, (2) data difficult for the notion of an icon do not necessarily challenge the notion of an iconic store, (3) the iconic store, as a theoretical mechanism, is an ecologically valid one, and (4) the rationale of experimentation is such that the experimental task need not mimic the phenomenon being studied

DON’T WASTE YOUR VOTE (AGAIN!). THE ITALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISION ON ELECTION LAWS: AN EPISODE OF STRICT COMPARATIVE SCRUTINY

With a single judgment (sent. 1/2014), the Italian Constitutional Court has almost revolutionized Parliamentary election law, the national political landscape, the types of controversies with which it deals, and the means through which it reviews domestic legislation. In order to do so, the Court drew from globalized concepts and levels of scrutiny such as the so-called “proportionality test,” making explicit references to foreign decisions, while downplaying the Constitutional Framers’ intention. Although this decision has brought Italy closer in line with the trends that characterize contemporary global constitutionalism, its concrete effects on Italian law and the political system are not so promising or clear. This paper investigates the explicit and implicit sources of inspiration for the decision, its hidden implications, and it resonates with globalized trends in constitutional law

International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis

ICON: Anaphylaxis provides a unique perspective on the principal evidence-based anaphylaxis guidelines developed and published independently from 2010 through 2014 by four allergy/immunology organizations. These guidelines concur with regard to the clinical features that indicate a likely diagnosis of anaphylaxis -- a life-threatening generalized or systemic allergic or hypersensitivity reaction. They also concur about prompt initial treatment with intramuscular injection of epinephrine (adrenaline) in the mid-outer thigh, positioning the patient supine (semi-reclining if dyspneic or vomiting), calling for help, and when indicated, providing supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, along with concomitant monitoring of vital signs and oxygenation. Additionally, they concur that H1-antihistamines, H2-antihistamines, and glucocorticoids are not initial medications of choice. For self-management of patients at risk of anaphylaxis in community settings, they recommend carrying epinephrine auto-injectors and personalized emergency action plans, as well as follow-up with a physician (ideally an allergy/immunology specialist) to help prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. ICON: Anaphylaxis describes unmet needs in anaphylaxis, noting that although epinephrine in 1 mg/mL ampules is available worldwide, other essentials, including supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation, and epinephrine auto-injectors are not universally available. ICON: Anaphylaxis proposes a comprehensive international research agenda that calls for additional prospective studies of anaphylaxis epidemiology, patient risk factors and co-factors, triggers, clinical criteria for diagnosis, randomized controlled trials of therapeutic interventions, and measures to prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. It also calls for facilitation of global collaborations in anaphylaxis research. In addition to confirming the alignment of major anaphylaxis guidelines, ICON: Anaphylaxis adds value by including summary tables and citing 130 key references. It is published as an information resource about anaphylaxis for worldwide use by healthcare professionals, academics, policy-makers, patients, caregivers, and the public

Monks and Icon Painters from the Spaso-Andronikov Monastery, Moscow

In the Monastery of Our Saviour and St. Andronicus in Moscow, skeletal remains of clerics and of (possibly) famous icon painters were discovered. The bones were radiocarbon dated, and concentrations of trace elements in bone tissues were measured. From tombs 1–4, the 14C dates obtained from human bones (likely monks) and from associated wood date to the 14th–15th centuries AD, as expected. Trace element concentrations indicate signs of fasting. Tomb 5 contained 2 burials; these could belong to the famous icon painters Rublev and Chernyi. Indeed, the bones show high concentrations of lead, zinc, and copper, which is typical for remains of artists and metallurgists. The 14C dates of the 2 skeletons, however, differ by 200 yr, and seem to be too old for Rublev and Chernyi. At this stage, it is not clear if the burials can be assigned to these painters.

PMI Activity TZ-1,2: IRS and LLIN: Integration of Methods and Insecticide Mode of Actions for Control of African Malaria Vector Mosquitoes

Long lasting Insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the preferred techniques for malaria vector control in Africa, where their application has a proven contribution to the recent significant reductions in the burden of the disease. Even though both methods are commonly used together in the same households, evidence of improved malaria control due to the use of combinations as opposed to use of either method alone has been minimal and inconclusive.To measure the mode of action of three classes of insecticides used for IRS at the WHO recommended dose: the organochlorine DDT 70 wettable powder (AVIMA, South Africa) at 2g/m2; the pyrethroid lambda-cyhalothrin capsule suspension ICON CS, (Syngenta, Switzerland), at 0.03g/m2; and the organophosphate pirimiphos-methyl (PM) emulsified concentrate, also known as actellic (Syngenta, Switzerland), at 2g/m2 used alone or in combination with three leading LLIN brands: PermaNet 2.0® nets (Vastergaard, Switzerland), Olyset® nets (manufactured by A-Z, Tanzania), and Icon Life® nets (Bestnet Europe ltd, Denmark). All LLINS were used intact and were not subjected to repeated washing to reflect their optimum performance. The control was untreated polyester net. Data were collected from experimental huts developed during the project to measure both behavioral and toxic modes of actions of insecticides in Southern Tanzania. The primary malaria vector is Anopheles arabiensis with >90% susceptibility to insecticides of all classes at diagnostic doses in WHO susceptibility assays. Two rounds of data collection were performed: 1) 4 months during the dry season 2) six months during the wet season. Data generated from the experimental hut studies were analysed with Poisson-lognormal generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM). Data was also simulated using deterministic mathematical model to measure potential impacts of each IRS, LLIN and combination thereof on malaria at a community level. Bite prevention (feeding inhibition): During both rounds, all the IRS treatments, LLINs and the controls (which consisted of intact untreated mosquito nets), provided greater than 99% protection from potentially infectious bites by the malaria vector, An. arabiensis, for the entire duration of the study. Most of the mosquitoes were caught inside the exit traps as opposed to inside the experimental huts, regardless of whether the huts were had LLINs, IRS or non-insecticidal nets. More than 95% of An. arabiensis, Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus and Mansonia africana / uniformis mosquitoes were caught inside the exit traps while exiting the huts. Toxicity: All IRS treatments, all the LLINs and the majority of LLIN/IRS combinations significantly increased proportions of dead An. arabiensis mosquitoes, relative to the control huts. The most toxic IRS relative to the controls was PM (RR = 2.21 (1.82 – 2.68), P < 0.001), followed by ICON CS (RR = 1.55 (1.27 – 1.89), P < 0.001) and then DDT (RR = 1.44 (1.18 – 1.77), P < 0.001). The most toxic LLIN relative to the controls was PermaNet 2.0® nets (RR = 1.65 (1.58 – 1.74), P < 0.001), followed by Icon Life® nets (RR = 1.55 (1.42 – 1.69), P < 0.001) and then Olyset® nets (RR = 1.33 (1.12 – 1.47), P < 0.001). Combinations of IRS and LLINs relative to LLINs alone: In most cases, there was no significant increase in An. arabiensis mortality in huts combining LLINs plus IRS, relative to huts having LLINs only, except in cases where the specific IRS treatment was PM. Addition of PM significantly increased proportional mortality of An. arabiensis when combined with Olyset® nets (RR = 1.38 (1.14 – 1.65), P = 0.001), PermaNet 2.0® nets (RR = 1.42 (1.18 – 1.71), P <0.001) and Icon Life® (RR = 1.24 (1.03 – 1.49), P = 0.023). Combinations of LLINs and DDT or lambda cyhalothrin resulted in marginal increases in An. arabiensis mortality relative to huts with LLINs alone although none of these combinations resulted in a statistically significant increase. Combinations of IRS and LLINs relative to IRS alone: There was a trend of significant increases in An. arabiensis mortality in huts having IRS plus LLINs, relative to huts having just the IRS alone, except for the combinations of 1) Olyset® with ICON CS, 2) DDT with Olyset® or 3) DDT with Icon Life® nets. In the huts that had been sprayed with PM, there was a significant increase in An. arabiensis mortality whenever Icon Life® nets (RR = 1.39 (1.18 – 1.63), P < 0.001), Olyset® nets (RR = 1.32 (1.13 – 1.55), P = 0.001) or PermaNet 2.0® nets (RR = 1.26 (1.08 – 1.48), P = 0.004) were added, relative to the huts where PM IRS was used alone. Similarly, in the huts that had been sprayed with ICON CS, there was a significant increase in An. arabiensis mortality in combination with Icon Life® nets (RR = 1.43 (1.19 – 1.73), P < 0.001) or PermaNet 2.0® nets (RR = 1.70 (1.35 – 2.13), P < 0.001), but not Olyset® nets (RR = 1.16 (0.92 – 1.45), P = 0.210), relative to the IRS alone. In huts sprayed with DDT, none of the LLINs significantly improved proportional mortality of the An. Arabiensis mosquitoes, except PermaNet 2.0® nets (RR = 1.18 (1.06 – 1.32), P = 0.003). Residual efficacy bioassays of IRS: All IRS formulations were highly effective during the first month after spraying and rapidly decayed losing most activity within 1-3 months. In month 1, all An. arabiensis exposed to palm ceilings sprayed with either PM or ICON CS died, and 85% were killed by DDT (despite full susceptibility most likely because it flaked away). On mud walls sprayed with the same chemicals, 100%, 90.0% and 97.5% mortality was observed, respectively, during the first month. Activity of the IRS declined significantly so that by the third month, PM on palm and mud killed 42.5% and 55.0% of exposed An. arabiensis, respectively. ICON CS killed only 46.3% on palm and 52.5% on mud walls. By month 6, PM had nearly entirely decayed, killing only 7.5% of An. arabiensis exposed to sprayed palm ceilings and 27.5% of those exposed to sprayed mud walls; ICON CS killed 30.0% on ceilings and 27.5% on walls. DDT had a longer residual action, killing 42.5% of An. arabiensis exposed to sprayed ceilings, and 36.3% of those exposed to sprayed walls after 6 months. Residual efficacy bioassays of LLINs: While all the LLINs generally performed better (i.e. killed more mosquitoes) on wire frame assays than on the cone assays, their activity rapidly deteriorated by the second month of use relative to new nets. Only PermaNet® nets retained mosquitocidal efficacy of >80% by the sixth month of net use (killing 92.7% on wire ball tests and 84% on cone assays). All the LLINs however retained very high knock-down rates (> 90% in wire ball tests and >80% in cone tests) on the exposed mosquitoes, except Olyset® nets whose knock-down activity reduced to 72.7% on wire ball tests and 62% on cone tests by the sixth month. Both the field studies and the model simulations showed that any synergies or redundancies resulting from LLIN/IRS combinations are primarily a function of modes of action of active ingredients used in the two interventions. None of the IRS or LLINs tested was deterrent so they do not protect by keeping mosquitoes from houses in this setting. Very few mosquitoes were able to obtain a blood meal due to the use of intact LLINs and untreated control nets. Therefore, where households are correctly using and maintaining LLINs there is no added value in the additional application of IRS unless the IRS chemical is highly toxic and non-irritant, as is PM. This compound consistently increased mosquito mortality in combination with any LLIN even though mosquitoes did not rest indoors as they were unable to obtain a blood meal. The average duration of effect of insecticides in this setting was 3 months, far lower than that stated by the manufacturers, so IRS should be carefully timed. Where IRS is the pre-existing intervention, providing households with additional LLINs confers additional protection. Therefore, IRS households should always be supplemented with nets, preferably LLINs, which not only protect house occupants against mosquito bites, but also kill additional mosquitoes. Finally, where resources are limited, priority should be given to providing everybody with LLINs and ensuring that these nets are consistently and appropriately used, rather than trying to implement both LLINs and IRS in the same community at the same time.\ud \u

International Consensus on Guiding Recommendations for Management of Patients with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Induced Gastropathy-ICON-G

Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), one of the most commonly used medications worldwide, are frequently associated with gastrointestinal adverse events. Primary care physicians often face the challenge of achieving adequate pain relief with NSAIDs, while keeping their adverse events to a minimum. This is especially true when long-term use of NSAIDs is required such as in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. To help primary care physicians deal with such challenges more effectively, a panel of expert gastroenterologists came together with the aim of developing practice recommendations. Methods: A modified ‘Delphi’ process was used to reach consensus and develop practice recommendations. Twelve gastroenterologists from nine countries provided their expert inputs to formulate the recommendations. These recommendations were carefully developed taking into account existing literature, current practices, and expert opinion of the panelists. Results: The expert panel developed a total of fifteen practice recommendations. Following are the key recommendations: NSAIDs should be prescribed only when necessary; before prescribing NSAIDs, associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors should be considered; H. pylori infection should be considered and treated before initiating NSAIDs; patients should be properly educated regarding NSAIDs use; patients who need to be on long-term NSAIDs should be prescribed a gastroprotective agent, preferably a proton pump inhibitor and these patients should be closely monitored for any untoward adverse events. Conclusion/clinical significance: These practice recommendations will serve as an important tool for primary care physicians and will guide them in making appropriate therapeutic choices for their patients. Keywords: Gastropathy, Gastroprotective agents, Non-prescription drugs, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents, Proton pump inhibitor. How to cite this article: Hunt R, Lazebnik LB, Marakhouski YC, Manuc M, Ramesh GN, Aye KS, Bordin DS, Bakulina NV, Iskakov BS, Khamraev AA, Stepanov YM, Ally R, Garg A. International Consensus on Guiding Recommendations for Management of Patients with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Induced Gastropathy-ICON-G. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol, 2018;8(2):148-160. Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: Richard Hunt has served as a consultant for INSYS, Dr Reddy's, Takeda, and Novartis. He has received an honorarium from Novartis, Danone, Dr Reddy's, and Takeda. He has been on the speaker's bureau for Takeda and Dr Reddy's and on scientific advisory board for INSYS. Dmitry S Bordin has served as a lecturer for Astellas, AstraZeneca, KRKA and Abbott. For the remaining authors, there are no conflicts of interest

Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models

The aim of this study was to compare standard plaster models with their digital counterparts for the applicability of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). Generated study models of 30 randomly selected patients: 30 pre- (T0) and 30 post- (T1) treatment. Two examiners, calibrated in the ICON, scored the digital and plaster models. The overall ICON scores were evaluated for reliability and reproducibility using kappa statistics and reliability coefficients. The values for reliability of the total and weighted ICON scores were generally high for the T0 sample (range 0.83-0.95) but less high for the T1 sample (range 0.55-0.85). Differences in total ICON score between plaster and digital models resulted in mostly statistically insignificant values (P values ranging from 0.07 to 0.19), except for observer 1 in the T1 sample. No statistically different values were found for the total ICON score on either plaster or digital models. ICON scores performed on computer-based models appear to be as accurate and reliable as ICON scores on plaster model

The upper-atmosphere extension of the ICON general circulation model (version: Ua-icon-1.0)

How the upper-atmosphere branch of the circulation contributes to and interacts with the circulation of the middle and lower atmosphere is a research area with many open questions. Inertia-gravity waves, for instance, have moved in the focus of research as they are suspected to be key features in driving and shaping the circulation. Numerical atmospheric models are an important pillar for this research. We use the ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) general circulation model, which is a joint development of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) and the German Weather Service (DWD), and provides, e.g., local mass conservation, a flexible grid nesting option, and a non-hydrostatic dynamical core formulated on an icosahedral-triangular grid. We extended ICON to the upper atmosphere and present here the two main components of this new configuration named UA-ICON: an extension of the dynamical core from shallow- to deep-atmosphere dynamics and the implementation of an upper-atmosphere physics package. A series of idealized test cases and climatological simulations is performed in order to evaluate the upper-atmosphere extension of ICON. © Author(s) 2019