32 research outputs found
Time-Sensitive Networking for Industrial Automation: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions
With the introduction of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and Internet of Things
(IoT) into industrial applications, industrial automation is undergoing
tremendous change, especially with regard to improving efficiency and reducing
the cost of products. Industrial automation applications are often required to
transmit time- and safety-critical data to monitor and control industrial
processes, especially for critical control systems. There are a number of
solutions to meet these requirements (e.g., priority-based real-time schedules
and closed-loop feedback control systems). However, due to their different
processing capabilities (e.g., in the end devices and network switches),
different vendors may come out with distinct solutions, and this makes the
large-scale integration of devices from different vendors difficult or
impossible. IEEE 802.1 Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) is a standardization
group formed to enhance and optimize the IEEE 802.1 network standards,
especially for Ethernet-based networks. These solutions can be evolved and
adapted into a cross-industry scenario, such as a large-scale distributed
industrial plant, which requires multiple industrial entities working
collaboratively. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the current
advances in TSN standards for industrial automation. We present the
state-of-the-art IEEE TSN standards and discuss the opportunities and
challenges when integrating each protocol into the industry domains. Finally,
we discuss some promising research about applying the TSN technology to
industrial automation applications
Evaluation of IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking Performance for Microgrid and Smart Grid Power System Applications
Proliferation of distributed energy resources and the importance of smart energy management has led to increased interest in microgrids. A microgrid is an area of the grid that can be disconnected and operated independently from the main grid when required and can generate some or all of its own energy needs with distributed energy resources and battery storage. This allows for the microgrid area to continue operating even when the main grid is unavailable. In addition, often a microgrid can utilize waste heat from energy generation to drive thermal loads, further improving energy utilization. This leads to increased reliability and overall efficiency in the microgrid area.As microgrids (and by extension the smart grid) become more widespread, new methods of communication and control are required to aid in management of many different distributed entities. One such communication architecture that may prove useful is the set of IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking (TSN) standards. These standards specify improvements and new capabilities for LAN based communication networks that previously made them unsuitable for widespread deployment in a power system setting. These standards include specifications for low latency guarantees, clock synchronization, data frame redundancy, and centralized system administration. These capabilities were previously available on proprietary or application specific solutions. However, they will now be available as part of the Ethernet standard, enabling backwards compatibility with existing network architecture and support with future advances.Two of the featured standards, IEEE 802.1AS (governing time-synchronization) and IEEE 802.1Qbv (governing time aware traffic shaping), will be tested and evaluated for their potential utility in power systems and microgrid applications. These tests will measure the latency achievable using TSN over a network at various levels of congestion and compare these results with UDP and TCP protocols. In addition, the ability to use synchronized clocks to generate waveforms for microgrid inverter synchronization will be explored
Quo vadis real time ethernet
Real time Ethernet (RTE) protocol suites are commonly operated within an exclusively allocated Ethernet based network that is used to exchange data for a distributed real time application. In practice, RTE protocol stack implementations interlace the maintenance of their data objects on the (standardised and loosely coupled) application layer with the task of traffic fitting. The latter includes the egress and ingress of application data over the underlying layers but also the coordination (scheduling) of the same. The set of time sensitive networking (TSN) IEEE standards is an addendum to common Ethernet (IEEE 802.3*). It has the aim to provide technologies to implement deterministic Ethernet networks. In factory automation RTE, an ongoing establishment of such technologies is observed. They lay the ground for various possibilities to shift the mechanisms for scheduling data transmissions towards networking juncture elements, e.g. Ethernet switch. This work intends to fabricate a stronger separation between the application layer and the tasks concerning traffic fitting. A demonstration setup is developed. It consists of an Ethernet switch (partly TSN capable), two programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and one input/output (I/O) device. Simultaneous operation of two unsimilar RTE protocol suites within the same network is shown. Possible optimisations applied to RTE application components, which target a higher level of determinism, are presented. Measurements underpin the chosen optimisations
Ethernet - a survey on its fields of application
During the last decades, Ethernet progressively became the most widely used local area networking (LAN) technology. Apart from LAN installations, Ethernet became also attractive for many other fields of application, ranging from industry to avionics, telecommunication, and multimedia. The expanded application of this technology is mainly due to its significant assets like reduced cost, backward-compatibility, flexibility, and expandability. However, this new trend raises some problems concerning the services of the protocol and the requirements for each application. Therefore, specific adaptations prove essential to integrate this communication technology in each field of application. Our primary objective is to show how Ethernet has been enhanced to comply with the specific requirements of several application fields, particularly in transport, embedded and multimedia contexts. The paper first describes the common Ethernet LAN technology and highlights its main features. It reviews the most important specific Ethernet versions with respect to each application field’s requirements. Finally, we compare these different fields of application and we particularly focus on the fundamental concepts and the quality of service capabilities of each proposal
Time synchronization for an emulated CAN device on a Multi-Processor System on Chip
The increasing number of applications implemented on modern vehicles leads to the use of multi-core platforms in the automotive field. As the number of I/O interfaces offered by these platforms is typically lower than the number of integrated applications, a solution is needed to provide access to the peripherals, such as the Controller Area Network (CAN), to all applications. Emulation and virtualization can be used to implement and share a CAN bus among multiple applications. Furthermore, cyber-physical automotive applications often require time synchronization. A time synchronization protocol on CAN has been recently introduced by AUTOSAR. In this article we present how multiple applications can share a CAN port, which can be on the local processor tile or on a remote tile. Each application can access a local time base, synchronized over CAN, using the AUTOSAR Application Programming Interface (API). We evaluate our approach with four emulation and virtualization examples, trading the number of applications per core with the speed of the software emulated CAN bus.</p
Time Sensitive Networking - Sviluppo di un ambiente di test
In ambito industriale si hanno processi real-time, le cui azioni devono avvenire entro un intervallo di tempo.
Non rispettare una scadenza può avere conseguenze disastrose.
Questi processi possono essere portati avanti da più dispositivi, i quali necessitano di comunicazioni deterministiche per parlare tra di loro.
Ethernet offre ottime prestazioni e ha dimostrato di poter stare al passo delle innovazioni tecnologiche, ma sono necessarie modifiche per potere garantire una comunicazione deterministica.
Gli standard per le Time Sensitive Network(TSN) permettono di utilizzare Ethernet come protocollo real-time.
\`E stato definito un ambiente di test per reti TSN, atto a replicare utilizzi industriali, per verificare il funzionamento degli standard TSN
Comparing Admission Control Architectures for Real-Time Ethernet
Industry 4.0 and Autonomous Driving are emerging resource-intensive distributed application domains that deal with open and evolving environments. These systems are subject to stringent resource, timing, and other non-functional constraints, as well as frequent reconfiguration. Thus, real-time behavior must not preclude operational flexibility. This combination is motivating ongoing efforts within the Time Sensitive Networking (TSN) standardization committee to define admission control mechanisms for Ethernet. Existing mechanisms in TSN, like those of AVB, its predecessor, follow a distributed architecture that favors scalability. Conversely, the new mechanisms envisaged for TSN (IEEE 802.1Qcc) follow a (partially) centralized architecture, favoring short reconfiguration latency. This paper shows the first quantitative comparison between distributed and centralized admission control architectures concerning reconfiguration latency. Here, we compare AVB against a dynamic real-time reconfigurable Ethernet technology with centralized management, namely HaRTES. Our experiments show a significantly lower latency using the centralized architecture. We also observe the dependence of the distributed architecture in the end nodes' performance and the benefit of having a protected channel for the admission control transactions.This work was supported in part by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), in part by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo
Regional (FEDER) [AEI/FEDER, Unión Europea (UE)] under Grant TEC2015-70313-R, in part by the European Regional Development
Fund (FEDER) through the Operational Programme for Competitivity and the Internationalization of Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement
(PRODUTECH-SIF) under Grant POCI-01-0247-FEDER-024541, and in part by the Research Centre Instituto de Telecomunicações under
Grant UID/EEA/50008/2013.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
The future roadmap of in-vehicle network processing: a HW-centric (R-)evolution
© 2022 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes,creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.The automotive industry is undergoing a deep revolution. With the race towards autonomous driving, the amount of technologies, sensors and actuators that need to be integrated in the vehicle increases exponentially. This imposes new great challenges in the vehicle electric/electronic (E/E) architecture and, especially, in the In-Vehicle Network (IVN). In this work, we analyze the evolution of IVNs, and focus on the main network processing platform integrated in them: the Gateway (GW). We derive the requirements of Network Processing Platforms that need to be fulfilled by future GW controllers focusing on two perspectives: functional requirements and structural requirements. Functional requirements refer to the functionalities that need to be delivered by these network processing platforms. Structural requirements refer to design aspects which ensure the feasibility, usability and future evolution of the design. By focusing on the Network Processing architecture, we review the available options in the state of the art, both in industry and academia. We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each architecture in terms of the coverage provided for the functional and structural requirements. In our analysis, we detect a gap in this area: there is currently no architecture fulfilling all the requirements of future automotive GW controllers. In light of the available network processing architectures and the current technology landscape, we identify Hardware (HW) accelerators and custom processor design as a key differentiation factor which boosts the devices performance. From our perspective, this points to a need - and a research opportunity - to explore network processing architectures with a strong HW focus, unleashing the potential of next-generation network processors and supporting the demanding requirements of future autonomous and connected vehicles.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version