Hybridization based CEGAR for Hybrid Automata with Affine Dynamics

Ope

LNCS

Reachability analysis is difficult for hybrid automata with affine differential equations, because the reach set needs to be approximated. Promising abstraction techniques usually employ interval methods or template polyhedra. Interval methods account for dense time and guarantee soundness, and there are interval-based tools that overapproximate affine flowpipes. But interval methods impose bounded and rigid shapes, which make refinement expensive and fixpoint detection difficult. Template polyhedra, on the other hand, can be adapted flexibly and can be unbounded, but sound template refinement for unbounded reachability analysis has been implemented only for systems with piecewise constant dynamics. We capitalize on the advantages of both techniques, combining interval arithmetic and template polyhedra, using the former to abstract time and the latter to abstract space. During a CEGAR loop, whenever a spurious error trajectory is found, we compute additional space constraints and split time intervals, and use these space-time interpolants to eliminate the counterexample. Space-time interpolation offers a lazy, flexible framework for increasing precision while guaranteeing soundness, both for error avoidance and fixpoint detection. To the best of out knowledge, this is the first abstraction refinement scheme for the reachability analysis over unbounded and dense time of affine hybrid systems, which is both sound and automatic. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm with several benchmark examples, which cannot be handled by other tools

IST Austria Thesis

Hybrid automata combine finite automata and dynamical systems, and model the interaction of digital with physical systems. Formal analysis that can guarantee the safety of all behaviors or rigorously witness failures, while unsolvable in general, has been tackled algorithmically using, e.g., abstraction, bounded model-checking, assisted theorem proving. Nevertheless, very few methods have addressed the time-unbounded reachability analysis of hybrid automata and, for current sound and automatic tools, scalability remains critical. We develop methods for the polyhedral abstraction of hybrid automata, which construct coarse overapproximations and tightens them incrementally, in a CEGAR fashion. We use template polyhedra, i.e., polyhedra whose facets are normal to a given set of directions. While, previously, directions were given by the user, we introduce (1) the first method for computing template directions from spurious counterexamples, so as to generalize and eliminate them. The method applies naturally to convex hybrid automata, i.e., hybrid automata with (possibly non-linear) convex constraints on derivatives only, while for linear ODE requires further abstraction. Specifically, we introduce (2) the conic abstractions, which, partitioning the state space into appropriate (possibly non-uniform) cones, divide curvy trajectories into relatively straight sections, suitable for polyhedral abstractions. Finally, we introduce (3) space-time interpolation, which, combining interval arithmetic and template refinement, computes appropriate (possibly non-uniform) time partitioning and template directions along spurious trajectories, so as to eliminate them. We obtain sound and automatic methods for the reachability analysis over dense and unbounded time of convex hybrid automata and hybrid automata with linear ODE. We build prototype tools and compare—favorably—our methods against the respective state-of-the-art tools, on several benchmarks

On the Trade-off Between Efficiency and Precision of Neural Abstraction

Neural abstractions have been recently introduced as formal approximations of complex, nonlinear dynamical models. They comprise a neural ODE and a certified upper bound on the error between the abstract neural network and the concrete dynamical model. So far neural abstractions have exclusively been obtained as neural networks consisting entirely of $ReLU$ activation functions, resulting in neural ODE models that have piecewise affine dynamics, and which can be equivalently interpreted as linear hybrid automata. In this work, we observe that the utility of an abstraction depends on its use: some scenarios might require coarse abstractions that are easier to analyse, whereas others might require more complex, refined abstractions. We therefore consider neural abstractions of alternative shapes, namely either piecewise constant or nonlinear non-polynomial (specifically, obtained via sigmoidal activations). We employ formal inductive synthesis procedures to generate neural abstractions that result in dynamical models with these semantics. Empirically, we demonstrate the trade-off that these different neural abstraction templates have vis-a-vis their precision and synthesis time, as well as the time required for their safety verification (done via reachability computation). We improve existing synthesis techniques to enable abstraction of higher-dimensional models, and additionally discuss the abstraction of complex neural ODEs to improve the efficiency of reachability analysis for these models.Comment: To appear at QEST 202

LNCS

Despite researchers’ efforts in the last couple of decades, reachability analysis is still a challenging problem even for linear hybrid systems. Among the existing approaches, the most practical ones are mainly based on bounded-time reachable set over-approximations. For the purpose of unbounded-time analysis, one important strategy is to abstract the original system and find an invariant for the abstraction. In this paper, we propose an approach to constructing a new kind of abstraction called conic abstraction for affine hybrid systems, and to computing reachable sets based on this abstraction. The essential feature of a conic abstraction is that it partitions the state space of a system into a set of convex polyhedral cones which is derived from a uniform conic partition of the derivative space. Such a set of polyhedral cones is able to cut all trajectories of the system into almost straight segments so that every segment of a reach pipe in a polyhedral cone tends to be straight as well, and hence can be over-approximated tightly by polyhedra using similar techniques as HyTech or PHAVer. In particular, for diagonalizable affine systems, our approach can guarantee to find an invariant for unbounded reachable sets, which is beyond the capability of bounded-time reachability analysis tools. We implemented the approach in a tool and experiments on benchmarks show that our approach is more powerful than SpaceEx and PHAVer in dealing with diagonalizable systems

Remedies for building reliable cyber-physical systems

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are systems that are tight integration of computer programs as controllers or cyber parts, and physical environments. The interaction is carried out by obtaining information about the physical environment through reading sensors and responding to the current knowledge through actuators. Examples of such systems are autonomous automobile systems, avionic systems, robotic systems, and medical devices. Perhaps the most common feature of all these systems is that they are all safety critical systems and failure most likely causes catastrophic consequences. This means that while testing continues to increase confidence in cyber-physical systems, formal or mathematical proofs are needed at the very least for the safety requirements of these systems. Hybrid automata is the main modeling language for cyber-physical systems. However, verifying safety properties is undecidable for all but very restricted known classes of these automata. Our first result introduces a new subclass of hybrid automata for which bounded time safety model checking problem is decidable. We also prove that unbounded time model checking for this subclass is undecidable which suggests this is the best one can hope for the new class. Our second result in this thesis is a counter-example guided abstraction refinement algorithm for unbounded time model checking of non- linear hybrid automata. Clearly, this is an undecidable problem and that is the main reason for using abstraction refinement techniques. Our CEGAR framework for this class is sound but not complete, meaning the algorithm never incorrectly says a system is safe, but may output unsafe incorrectly. We have also implemented our algorithm and compared it with seven other tools. There are multiple inherent problems with traditional model checking approaches. First, it is well-known that most models do not depict physical environments precisely. Second, the model checking problem is undecidable for most classes of hybrid automata. And third, even when model checking is decidable, controller part in most models cannot be implemented. These problems suggest that current methods of modeling cyber-physical systems and problems might not be the right ones. Our last result focuses on robust model checking of cyber-physical systems. In this part of the thesis, we focus on the implementability issue and show how to solve four different robust model checking problem for timed automata. We also introduce an optimal algorithm for robust time bounded safety model checking of monotonic rectangular automata

An abstraction and refinement computational approach to safety verification of discrete time nonlinear systems

This paper addresses safety verification of nonlinear systems through invariant set computation. More precisely, our goal is verifying if the state of a given discrete time nonlinear system will keep evolving within a safe region, starting from a given set of initial conditions. To this purpose, we introduce a conformant PieceWise Affine (PWA) abstraction of the nonlinear system, which is instrumental to computing a conservative approximation of its maximal invariant set within the safe region. If the obtained set covers the set of initial conditions, safety is proven. Otherwise, subsequent refinements of the PWA abstraction are performed, either on the whole safe region or on some appropriate subset identified through a guided refinement approach and containing the set of initial conditions. Some numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach

Reachability Analysis of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Symbolic-Numeric Techniques

In this thesis, we address the problem of reachability analysis in cyber-physical systems. These are systems engineered by interfacing computational components with the physical world. They provide partially or fully automated safety-critical services in the form of medical devices, autonomous vehicles, avionics and power systems. We propose techniques to reason about the reachability of such systems, and provide methods for falsifying their safety properties. We model the cyber component as a software program and the physical component as a hybrid dynamical system. Unlike model based analysis, which uses either a purely symbolic or a numerical approach, we argue in favor of using a combination of the two. We justify this by noting that the software program running on a computer is completely specified and has precise semantics. In contrast, the model of the physical system is only an approximation. Hence, we treat the former as a white box, but treat the latter as a black box. Using symbolic methods for the cyber components and numerical methods for hybrid systems, we carefully capture the complex behaviors of software programs and circumvent the difficulty in analyzing complex models developed through first principles. To combine the two techniques, we use a Counterexample Guided Abstraction Refinement (CEGAR) framework. Furthermore, we explore learning techniques like regression and piecewise affine modeling to estimate and represent black box hybrid dynamical systems for the purpose of falsification. We use prototype implementations to demonstrate the effectiveness of presented ideas. Using non-trivial benchmarks, we compare their performance against the state of the art. We also comment on their applicability and discuss ideas for further improvement