3 research outputs found

    Integrating social and environmental impacts of green transportation infrastructure : a framework for effective decision-making

    Get PDF
    Green Infrastructure (GI) gains recognition as a viable alternative to traditional infrastructure due to its economic, environmental, and social benefits. However, quantifying and monetizing GI\u27s social and environmental impacts pose challenges, leading to their neglect in comparative evaluations. To heighten GI\u27s appeal, this study introduces a novel framework that incorporates social and environmental impacts and public opinion using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Monte Carlo simulation. The framework offers a comprehensive approach to evaluate GI\u27s impact. Findings from a Philadelphia project demonstrate that projects with more GI elements are cost-effective when considering public opinion and long-term benefits. The research emphasizes the importance of incorporating GI\u27s threefold benefits into evaluation frameworks, aiding decision-makers in making informed choices by accounting for social, environmental, and economic impact

    Life cycle sustainability assessment for selecting construction materials in the preliminary design phase of road construction projects

    Get PDF
    Road construction project activities cause severe harm to the environment as they consume a tremendous volume of materials and release pollutants into the environment. Besides, an increasing number of researchers is participating in work related to sustainability in the construction industry as well as road construction projects. Similar to other life cycles, a strong influence on sustainability is exerted in the early phases of road construction projects, especially in the preliminary design phase. Especially selecting materials is one of the most critical tasks in this phase because it contributes considerably to the achievement of sustainability targets. For enabling a conscious and systematic selection of materials, a significant evaluation of materials with regard to the three dimensions of sustainability is necessary. However, a well-elaborated and mature instrument supporting such an evaluation has not been developed and presented in literature until now. In the contrary, several studies revealed that the material-dependent activities and the life cycle analysis have been neglected so far. Moreover, selecting materials in the preliminary design phase is mainly based on designers’ experience and not on the application of analytic methods. Such selection is highly error-prone. In this thesis, current material selection methods for sustainable development in the preliminary design phase were analyzed. Initially, material selection studies conducted in the early design phase were analyzed to determine the relevant issues. The result emphasized that the integration of sustainability into material selection in the preliminary design phase encountered many obstacles, such as unavailable information and databases. Then, the most important sustainability criteria for selecting road construction materials were identified, covering the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability. Next, approaches which suggest the application of LCC, LCA, Social LCA, MCDM, and LCSA in road construction material selection are discussed in order to identify their limitations. Accordingly, this thesis developed an instrument based on the LCC, LCA, Social LCA, MCDM methods, and LCSA for assessing the sustainability performance of road construction materials in the preliminary design phase. The instrument is intended to help designers select the most sustainable materials by addressing the issues that emerge in the preliminary design phase. Firstly, a procedure model for evaluating the sustainability performance of road construction materials is suggested. It is based on two existing procedure models. One is a decision theory-based procedure model for sustainability-oriented evaluations. The model is divided into two levels, with the overall sustainability performance evaluation at the first level and the evaluation of the economic, environmental, and social performances at the second level. Although this procedure model demonstrates some benefits and has been utilized in some cases, the four-step LCA procedure, according to ISO 14044, appears to be more prevalent and well-established. Therefore, it is suggested here to integrate both approaches. This procedure model contributes to integrating the LCC, LCA, and Social LCA). Secondly, this instrument for assessing the sustainable performance of materials is further developed based on the step-by-step models of three pillars of sustainability. This allows for employing numerical methods from the LCC, LCA and Social LCA and thereby reducing the mistakes from the experience-based selection of designers. The proposed instrument also addresses the specific challenges of material selection in the preliminary design phase. The LCC could refine all material-dependent costs incurred during the life cycle and evaluate the material alternatives' total cost. Besides, it defines long-term outcomes by dividing the material life cycle into many consecutive phases and applying the time value of money into the calculation. For the LCA, two scenarios are proposed to solve the problems concerning the lack of available information in the preliminary design phase. Besides, the environmental performance of material-dependent activities, such as the usage of equipment and labor, is also considered in the method. The Social LCA is developed based on the Performance Preference Point (PPR) approach and the Subcategory Assessment Method (SAM) to assess the social performance of road construction materials. The method also shows the potential to support the designers in selecting the most social-friendly material by considering the material-dependent activities and stakeholders. The LCC, LCA, and Social LCA analyses integrated into the LCSA to come up with the general perspective of sustainable level. From the perspective of decision-makers, the importance level of sustainability dimensions might be different. The study suggests applying the AHP method and Likert Scale to evaluate the weightings and then integrating them into the LCSA model to assess the general sustainability performance of road construction materials. After that, a ternary diagram can be drawn to provide a comprehensive picture of the road construction material selection in dependence on these weightings. The assessment of two alternatives, “concrete bricks” and “baked bricks”, was conducted as a case study to illustrate and demonstrate the procedure model
    corecore