Computational category-theoretic rewriting

We demonstrate how category theory provides specifications that can efficiently be implemented via imperative algorithms and apply this to the field of graph rewriting. By examples, we show how this paradigm of software development makes it easy to quickly write correct and performant code. We provide a modern implementation of graph rewriting techniques at the level of abstraction of finitely-presented C-sets and clarify the connections between C-sets and the typed graphs supported in existing rewriting software. We emphasize that our open-source library is extensible: by taking new categorical constructions (such as slice categories, structured cospans, and distributed graphs) and relating their limits and colimits to those of their underlying categories, users inherit efficient algorithms for pushout complements and (final) pullback complements. This allows one to perform double-, single-, and sesqui-pushout rewriting over a broad class of data structures

Finitary M-adhesive categories

Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.Finitary M-adhesive categories are M-adhesive categories with finite objects only, where M-adhesive categories are a slight generalisation of weak adhesive high-level replacement (HLR) categories. We say an object is finite if it has a finite number of M-subobjects. In this paper, we show that in finitary M-adhesive categories we not only have all the well-known HLR properties of weak adhesive HLR categories, which are already valid for M-adhesive categories, but also all the additional HLR requirements needed to prove classical results including the Local Church-Rosser, Parallelism, Concurrency, Embedding, Extension and Local Confluence Theorems, where the last of these is based on critical pairs. More precisely, we are able to show that finitary M-adhesive categories have a unique ε'-M factorisation and initial pushouts, and the existence of an M-initial object implies we also have finite coproducts and a unique ε' -M pair factorisation. Moreover, we can show that the finitary restriction of each M-adhesive category is a finitary M-adhesive category, and finitarity is preserved under functor and comma category constructions based on M-adhesive categories. This means that all the classical results are also valid for corresponding finitary M-adhesive transformation systems including several kinds of finitary graph and Petri net transformation systems. Finally, we discuss how some of the results can be extended to non-M-adhesive categories

Graph Rewriting and Relabeling with PBPO+

We extend the powerful Pullback-Pushout (PBPO) approach for graph rewriting with strong matching. Our approach, called \pbpostrong, exerts more control over the embedding of the pattern in the host graph, which is important for a large class of graph rewrite systems. In addition, we show that \pbpostrong is well-suited for rewriting labeled graphs and certain classes of attributed graphs. For this purpose, we employ a lattice structure on the label set and use order-preserving graph morphisms. We argue that our approach is simpler and more general than related relabeling approaches in the literature.Comment: 20 pages, accepted to the International Conference on Graph Transformation 2021 (ICGT 2021

Construction of Pushout Complements in the Category of Hypergraphs

We describe a concrete construction of all pushout complements for two given morphisms f : A -> B, m: B -> D in the category of hypergraphs, valid also for the case where f, m are non-injective. It is based on the generation of suitable equivalence relations. We also give a combinatorial interpretation and show how well-known coefficients from combinatorics, such as the Bell numbers, can be recovered. Furthermore we present a formula that can be used to compute the number of pushout complements for two given morphisms

A Unifying Theory for Graph Transformation

The field of graph transformation studies the rule-based transformation of graphs. An important branch is the algebraic graph transformation tradition, in which approaches are defined and studied using the language of category theory. Most algebraic graph transformation approaches (such as DPO, SPO, SqPO, and AGREE) are opinionated about the local contexts that are allowed around matches for rules, and about how replacement in context should work exactly. The approaches also differ considerably in their underlying formal theories and their general expressiveness (e.g., not all frameworks allow duplication). This dissertation proposes an expressive algebraic graph transformation approach, called PBPO+, which is an adaptation of PBPO by Corradini et al. The central contribution is a proof that PBPO+ subsumes (under mild restrictions) DPO, SqPO, AGREE, and PBPO in the important categorical setting of quasitoposes. This result allows for a more unified study of graph transformation metatheory, methods, and tools. A concrete example of this is found in the second major contribution of this dissertation: a graph transformation termination method for PBPO+, based on decreasing interpretations, and defined for general categories. By applying the proposed encodings into PBPO+, this method can also be applied for DPO, SqPO, AGREE, and PBPO

Formal Foundations for Information-Preserving Model Synchronization Processes Based on Triple Graph Grammars

Zwischen verschiedenen Artefakten, die Informationen teilen, wieder Konsistenz herzustellen, nachdem eines von ihnen geändert wurde, ist ein wichtiges Problem, das in verschiedenen Bereichen der Informatik auftaucht. Mit dieser Dissertation legen wir eine Lösung für das grundlegende Modellsynchronisationsproblem vor. Bei diesem Problem ist ein Paar solcher Artefakte (Modelle) gegeben, von denen eines geändert wurde; Aufgabe ist die Wiederherstellung der Konsistenz. Tripelgraphgrammatiken (TGGs) sind ein etablierter und geeigneter Formalismus, um dieses und verwandte Probleme anzugehen. Da sie auf der algebraischen Theorie der Graphtransformation und dem (Double-)Pushout Zugang zu Ersetzungssystemen basieren, sind sie besonders geeignet, um Lösungen zu entwickeln, deren Eigenschaften formal bewiesen werden können. Doch obwohl TGG-basierte Ansätze etabliert sind, leiden viele von ihnen unter dem Problem des Informationsverlustes. Wenn ein Modell geändert wurde, können während eines Synchronisationsprozesses Informationen verloren gehen, die nur im zweiten Modell vorliegen. Das liegt daran, dass solche Synchronisationsprozesse darauf zurückfallen Konsistenz dadurch wiederherzustellen, dass sie das geänderte Modell (bzw. große Teile von ihm) neu übersetzen. Wir schlagen einen TGG-basierten Ansatz vor, der fortgeschrittene Features von TGGs unterstützt (Attribute und negative Constraints), durchgängig formalisiert ist, implementiert und inkrementell in dem Sinne ist, dass er den Informationsverlust im Vergleich mit vorherigen Ansätzen drastisch reduziert. Bisher gibt es keinen TGG-basierten Ansatz mit vergleichbaren Eigenschaften. Zentraler Beitrag dieser Dissertation ist es, diesen Ansatz formal auszuarbeiten und seine wesentlichen Eigenschaften, nämlich Korrektheit, Vollständigkeit und Termination, zu beweisen. Die entscheidende neue Idee unseres Ansatzes ist es, Reparaturregeln anzuwenden. Dies sind spezielle Regeln, die es erlauben, Änderungen an einem Modell direkt zu propagieren anstatt auf Neuübersetzung zurückzugreifen. Um diese Reparaturregeln erstellen und anwenden zu können, entwickeln wir grundlegende Beiträge zur Theorie der algebraischen Graphtransformation. Zunächst entwickeln wir eine neue Art der sequentiellen Komposition von Regeln. Im Gegensatz zur gewöhnlichen Komposition, die zu Regeln führt, die Elemente löschen und dann wieder neu erzeugen, können wir Regeln herleiten, die solche Elemente stattdessen bewahren. Technisch gesehen findet der Synchronisationsprozess, den wir entwickeln, außerdem in der Kategorie der partiellen Tripelgraphen statt und nicht in der der normalen Tripelgraphen. Daher müssen wir sicherstellen, dass die für Double-Pushout-Ersetzungssysteme ausgearbeitete Theorie immer noch gültig ist. Dazu entwickeln wir eine (kategorientheoretische) Konstruktion neuer Kategorien aus gegebenen und zeigen, dass (i) diese Konstruktion die Axiome erhält, die nötig sind, um die Theorie für Double-Pushout-Ersetzungssysteme zu entwickeln, und (ii) partielle Tripelgraphen als eine solche Kategorie konstruiert werden können. Zusammen ermöglichen diese beiden grundsätzlichen Beiträge es uns, unsere Lösung für das grundlegende Modellsynchronisationsproblem vollständig formal auszuarbeiten und ihre zentralen Eigenschaften zu beweisen.Restoring consistency between different information-sharing artifacts after one of them has been changed is an important problem that arises in several areas of computer science. In this thesis, we provide a solution to the basic model synchronization problem. There, a pair of such artifacts (models), one of which has been changed, is given and consistency shall be restored. Triple graph grammars (TGGs) are an established and suitable formalism to address this and related problems. Being based on the algebraic theory of graph transformation and (double-)pushout rewriting, they are especially suited to develop solutions whose properties can be formally proven. Despite being established, many TGG-based solutions do not satisfactorily deal with the problem of information loss. When one model is changed, in the process of restoring consistency such solutions may lose information that is only present in the second model because the synchronization process resorts to restoring consistency by re-translating (large parts of) the updated model. We introduce a TGG-based approach that supports advanced features of TGGs (attributes and negative constraints), is comprehensively formalized, implemented, and is incremental in the sense that it drastically reduces the amount of information loss compared to former approaches. Up to now, a TGG-based approach with these characteristics is not available. The central contribution of this thesis is to formally develop that approach and to prove its essential properties, namely correctness, completeness, and termination. The crucial new idea in our approach is the use of repair rules, which are special rules that allow one to directly propagate changes from one model to the other instead of resorting to re-translation. To be able to construct and apply these repair rules, we contribute more fundamentally to the theory of algebraic graph transformation. First, we develop a new kind of sequential rule composition. Whereas the conventional composition of rules leads to rules that delete and re-create elements, we can compute rules that preserve such elements instead. Furthermore, technically the setting in which the synchronization process we develop takes place is the category of partial triple graphs and not the one of ordinary triple graphs. Hence, we have to ensure that the elaborate theory of double-pushout rewriting still applies. Therefore, we develop a (category-theoretic) construction of new categories from given ones and show that (i) this construction preserves the axioms that are necessary to develop the theory of double-pushout rewriting and (ii) partial triple graphs can be constructed as such a category. Together, those two more fundamental contributions enable us to develop our solution to the basic model synchronization problem in a fully formal manner and to prove its central properties

Matrix Graph Grammars

This book objective is to develop an algebraization of graph grammars. Equivalently, we study graph dynamics. From the point of view of a computer scientist, graph grammars are a natural generalization of Chomsky grammars for which a purely algebraic approach does not exist up to now. A Chomsky (or string) grammar is, roughly speaking, a precise description of a formal language (which in essence is a set of strings). On a more discrete mathematical style, it can be said that graph grammars -- Matrix Graph Grammars in particular -- study dynamics of graphs. Ideally, this algebraization would enforce our understanding of grammars in general, providing new analysis techniques and generalizations of concepts, problems and results known so far.Comment: 321 pages, 75 figures. This book has is publisehd by VDM verlag, ISBN 978-363921255

Reversible Sesqui-Pushout Rewriting

The paper proposes a variant of sesqui-pushout rewriting (SqPO) that allows one to develop the theory of nested application conditions (NACs) for arbitrary rule spans; this is a considerable generalisation compared with existing results for NACs, which only hold for linear rules (w.r.t. a suitable class of monos). Besides this main contribution, namely an adapted shifting construction for NACs, the paper presents a uniform commutativity result for a revised notion of independence that applies to arbitrary rules; these theorems hold in any category with (enough) stable pushouts and a class of monos rendering it weak adhesive HLR. To illustrate results and concepts, we use simple graphs, i.e. the category of binary endorelations and relation preserving functions, as it is a paradigmatic example of a category with stable pushouts; moreover, using regular monos to give semantics to NACs, we can shift NACs over arbitrary rule spans

Graph-based software specification and verification

The (in)correct functioning of many software systems heavily influences how\ud we qualify our daily lives. Software companies as well as academic computer\ud science research groups spend much effort on applying and developing techniques for improving the correctness of software systems. In this dissertation\ud we focus on using and developing graph-based techniques to specify and verify\ud the behaviour of software systems in general, and object-oriented systems more\ud specifically. We elaborate on two ways to improve the correctness (and thereby\ud the quality) of such systems.\ud Firstly, we investigate the potential of using the graph transformation tech-\ud nique to formally specify the dynamic semantics of (object-oriented) program-\ud ming languages. Those semantics are typically specified in natural language.\ud Such specifications are often hard to understand or even ambiguous. We show\ud how the graph transformation framework provides formal and intuitive means\ud for their specification.\ud Secondly, we develop techniques to verify systems of which the behaviour is\ud specified as graph production systems. For the verification of such systems, we\ud introduce an algorithm that combines a well-known on-the-\ud y model checking\ud algorithm with ideas from bounded model checking. One of the main prob-\ud lems of model checking is the state-explosion problem. This problem is often\ud tackled using partial order reduction techniques. Unfortunately, many such\ud techniques are based on assumptions that do not hold for graph production sys-\ud tems. Therefore, we develop a new dynamic partial order reduction algorithm\ud based on selecting so-called probe sets and prove its correctness.\ud Most of the techniques developed in this dissertation have been implemented\ud in the graph transformation tool GROOVE