Runtime Monitoring for Dependable Hardware Design

Mit dem Voranschreiten der Technologieskalierung und der Globalisierung der Produktion von integrierten Schaltkreisen eröffnen sich eine Fülle von Schwachstellen bezüglich der Verlässlichkeit von Computerhardware. Jeder Mikrochip wird aufgrund von Produktionsschwankungen mit einem einzigartigen Charakter geboren, welcher sich durch seine Arbeitsbedingungen, Belastung und Umgebung in individueller Weise entwickelt. Daher sind deterministische Modelle, welche zur Entwurfszeit die Verlässlichkeit prognostizieren, nicht mehr ausreichend um Integrierte Schaltkreise mit Nanometertechnologie sinnvoll abbilden zu können. Der Bedarf einer Laufzeitanalyse des Zustandes steigt und mit ihm die notwendigen Maßnahmen zum Erhalt der Zuverlässigkeit. Transistoren sind anfällig für auslastungsbedingte Alterung, die die Laufzeit der Schaltung erhöht und mit ihr die Möglichkeit einer Fehlberechnung. Hinzu kommen spezielle Abläufe die das schnelle Altern des Chips befördern und somit seine zuverlässige Lebenszeit reduzieren. Zusätzlich können strahlungsbedingte Laufzeitfehler (Soft-Errors) des Chips abnormales Verhalten kritischer Systeme verursachen. Sowohl das Ausbreiten als auch das Maskieren dieser Fehler wiederum sind abhängig von der Arbeitslast des Systems. Fabrizierten Chips können ebenfalls vorsätzlich während der Produktion boshafte Schaltungen, sogenannte Hardwaretrojaner, hinzugefügt werden. Dies kompromittiert die Sicherheit des Chips. Da diese Art der Manipulation vor ihrer Aktivierung kaum zu erfassen ist, ist der Nachweis von Trojanern auf einem Chip direkt nach der Produktion extrem schwierig. Die Komplexität dieser Verlässlichkeitsprobleme machen ein einfaches Modellieren der Zuverlässigkeit und Gegenmaßnahmen ineffizient. Sie entsteht aufgrund verschiedener Quellen, eingeschlossen der Entwicklungsparameter (Technologie, Gerät, Schaltung und Architektur), der Herstellungsparameter, der Laufzeitauslastung und der Arbeitsumgebung. Dies motiviert das Erforschen von maschinellem Lernen und Laufzeitmethoden, welche potentiell mit dieser Komplexität arbeiten können. In dieser Arbeit stellen wir Lösungen vor, die in der Lage sind, eine verlässliche Ausführung von Computerhardware mit unterschiedlichem Laufzeitverhalten und Arbeitsbedingungen zu gewährleisten. Wir entwickelten Techniken des maschinellen Lernens um verschiedene Zuverlässigkeitseffekte zu modellieren, zu überwachen und auszugleichen. Verschiedene Lernmethoden werden genutzt, um günstige Überwachungspunkte zur Kontrolle der Arbeitsbelastung zu finden. Diese werden zusammen mit Zuverlässigkeitsmetriken, aufbauend auf Ausfallsicherheit und generellen Sicherheitsattributen, zum Erstellen von Vorhersagemodellen genutzt. Des Weiteren präsentieren wir eine kosten-optimierte Hardwaremonitorschaltung, welche die Überwachungspunkte zur Laufzeit auswertet. Im Gegensatz zum aktuellen Stand der Technik, welcher mikroarchitektonische Überwachungspunkte ausnutzt, evaluieren wir das Potential von Arbeitsbelastungscharakteristiken auf der Logikebene der zugrundeliegenden Hardware. Wir identifizieren verbesserte Features auf Logikebene um feingranulare Laufzeitüberwachung zu ermöglichen. Diese Logikanalyse wiederum hat verschiedene Stellschrauben um auf höhere Genauigkeit und niedrigeren Overhead zu optimieren. Wir untersuchten die Philosophie, Überwachungspunkte auf Logikebene mit Hilfe von Lernmethoden zu identifizieren und günstigen Monitore zu implementieren um eine adaptive Vorbeugung gegen statisches Altern, dynamisches Altern und strahlungsinduzierte Soft-Errors zu schaffen und zusätzlich die Aktivierung von Hardwaretrojanern zu erkennen. Diesbezüglich haben wir ein Vorhersagemodell entworfen, welches den Arbeitslasteinfluss auf alterungsbedingte Verschlechterungen des Chips mitverfolgt und dazu genutzt werden kann, dynamisch zur Laufzeit vorbeugende Techniken, wie Task-Mitigation, Spannungs- und Frequenzskalierung zu benutzen. Dieses Vorhersagemodell wurde in Software implementiert, welche verschiedene Arbeitslasten aufgrund ihrer Alterungswirkung einordnet. Um die Widerstandsfähigkeit gegenüber beschleunigter Alterung sicherzustellen, stellen wir eine Überwachungshardware vor, welche einen Teil der kritischen Flip-Flops beaufsichtigt, nach beschleunigter Alterung Ausschau hält und davor warnt, wenn ein zeitkritischer Pfad unter starker Alterungsbelastung steht. Wir geben die Implementierung einer Technik zum Reduzieren der durch das Ausführen spezifischer Subroutinen auftretenden Belastung von zeitkritischen Pfaden. Zusätzlich schlagen wir eine Technik zur Abschätzung von online Soft-Error-Schwachstellen von Speicherarrays und Logikkernen vor, welche auf der Überwachung einer kleinen Gruppe Flip-Flops des Entwurfs basiert. Des Weiteren haben wir eine Methode basierend auf Anomalieerkennung entwickelt, um Arbeitslastsignaturen von Hardwaretrojanern während deren Aktivierung zur Laufzeit zu erkennen und somit eine letzte Verteidigungslinie zu bilden. Basierend auf diesen Experimenten demonstriert diese Arbeit das Potential von fortgeschrittener Feature-Extraktion auf Logikebene und lernbasierter Vorhersage basierend auf Laufzeitdaten zur Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit von Harwareentwürfen

Towards trustworthy computing on untrustworthy hardware

Historically, hardware was thought to be inherently secure and trusted due to its obscurity and the isolated nature of its design and manufacturing. In the last two decades, however, hardware trust and security have emerged as pressing issues. Modern day hardware is surrounded by threats manifested mainly in undesired modifications by untrusted parties in its supply chain, unauthorized and pirated selling, injected faults, and system and microarchitectural level attacks. These threats, if realized, are expected to push hardware to abnormal and unexpected behaviour causing real-life damage and significantly undermining our trust in the electronic and computing systems we use in our daily lives and in safety critical applications. A large number of detective and preventive countermeasures have been proposed in literature. It is a fact, however, that our knowledge of potential consequences to real-life threats to hardware trust is lacking given the limited number of real-life reports and the plethora of ways in which hardware trust could be undermined. With this in mind, run-time monitoring of hardware combined with active mitigation of attacks, referred to as trustworthy computing on untrustworthy hardware, is proposed as the last line of defence. This last line of defence allows us to face the issue of live hardware mistrust rather than turning a blind eye to it or being helpless once it occurs. This thesis proposes three different frameworks towards trustworthy computing on untrustworthy hardware. The presented frameworks are adaptable to different applications, independent of the design of the monitored elements, based on autonomous security elements, and are computationally lightweight. The first framework is concerned with explicit violations and breaches of trust at run-time, with an untrustworthy on-chip communication interconnect presented as a potential offender. The framework is based on the guiding principles of component guarding, data tagging, and event verification. The second framework targets hardware elements with inherently variable and unpredictable operational latency and proposes a machine-learning based characterization of these latencies to infer undesired latency extensions or denial of service attacks. The framework is implemented on a DDR3 DRAM after showing its vulnerability to obscured latency extension attacks. The third framework studies the possibility of the deployment of untrustworthy hardware elements in the analog front end, and the consequent integrity issues that might arise at the analog-digital boundary of system on chips. The framework uses machine learning methods and the unique temporal and arithmetic features of signals at this boundary to monitor their integrity and assess their trust level

Counter Unmanned Aircraft Systems Technologies and Operations

As the quarter-century mark in the 21st Century nears, new aviation-related equipment has come to the forefront, both to help us and to haunt us. (Coutu, 2020) This is particularly the case with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These vehicles have grown in popularity and accessible to everyone. Of different shapes and sizes, they are widely available for purchase at relatively low prices. They have moved from the backyard recreation status to important tools for the military, intelligence agencies, and corporate organizations. New practical applications such as military equipment and weaponry are announced on a regular basis – globally. (Coutu, 2020) Every country seems to be announcing steps forward in this bludgeoning field. In our successful 2nd edition of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the Cyber Domain: Protecting USA’s Advanced Air Assets (Nichols, et al., 2019), the authors addressed three factors influencing UAS phenomena. First, unmanned aircraft technology has seen an economic explosion in production, sales, testing, specialized designs, and friendly / hostile usages of deployed UAS / UAVs / Drones. There is a huge global growing market and entrepreneurs know it. Second, hostile use of UAS is on the forefront of DoD defense and offensive planners. They are especially concerned with SWARM behavior. Movies like “Angel has Fallen,” where drones in a SWARM use facial recognition technology to kill USSS agents protecting POTUS, have built the lore of UAS and brought the problem forefront to DHS. Third, UAS technology was exploding. UAS and Counter- UAS developments in navigation, weapons, surveillance, data transfer, fuel cells, stealth, weight distribution, tactics, GPS / GNSS elements, SCADA protections, privacy invasions, terrorist uses, specialized software, and security protocols has exploded. (Nichols, et al., 2019) Our team has followed / tracked joint ventures between military and corporate entities and specialized labs to build UAS countermeasures. As authors, we felt compelled to address at least the edge of some of the new C-UAS developments. It was clear that we would be lucky if we could cover a few of – the more interesting and priority technology updates – all in the UNCLASSIFIED and OPEN sphere. Counter Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Technologies and Operations is the companion textbook to our 2nd edition. The civilian market is interesting and entrepreneurial, but the military and intelligence markets are of concern because the US does NOT lead the pack in C-UAS technologies. China does. China continues to execute its UAS proliferation along the New Silk Road Sea / Land routes (NSRL). It has maintained a 7% growth in military spending each year to support its buildup. (Nichols, et al., 2019) [Chapter 21]. They continue to innovate and have recently improved a solution for UAS flight endurance issues with the development of advanced hydrogen fuel cell. (Nichols, et al., 2019) Reed and Trubetskoy presented a terrifying map of countries in the Middle East with armed drones and their manufacturing origin. Guess who? China. (A.B. Tabriski & Justin, 2018, December) Our C-UAS textbook has as its primary mission to educate and train resources who will enter the UAS / C-UAS field and trust it will act as a call to arms for military and DHS planners.https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/1031/thumbnail.jp

Cyber-Physical Threat Intelligence for Critical Infrastructures Security

Modern critical infrastructures comprise of many interconnected cyber and physical assets, and as such are large scale cyber-physical systems. Hence, the conventional approach of securing these infrastructures by addressing cyber security and physical security separately is no longer effective. Rather more integrated approaches that address the security of cyber and physical assets at the same time are required. This book presents integrated (i.e. cyber and physical) security approaches and technologies for the critical infrastructures that underpin our societies. Specifically, it introduces advanced techniques for threat detection, risk assessment and security information sharing, based on leading edge technologies like machine learning, security knowledge modelling, IoT security and distributed ledger infrastructures. Likewise, it presets how established security technologies like Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), pen-testing, vulnerability assessment and security data analytics can be used in the context of integrated Critical Infrastructure Protection. The novel methods and techniques of the book are exemplified in case studies involving critical infrastructures in four industrial sectors, namely finance, healthcare, energy and communications. The peculiarities of critical infrastructure protection in each one of these sectors is discussed and addressed based on sector-specific solutions. The advent of the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) is expected to increase the cyber-physical nature of critical infrastructures as well as their interconnection in the scope of sectorial and cross-sector value chains. Therefore, the demand for solutions that foster the interplay between cyber and physical security, and enable Cyber-Physical Threat Intelligence is likely to explode. In this book, we have shed light on the structure of such integrated security systems, as well as on the technologies that will underpin their operation. We hope that Security and Critical Infrastructure Protection stakeholders will find the book useful when planning their future security strategies

Advanced Automation for Space Missions

The feasibility of using machine intelligence, including automation and robotics, in future space missions was studied

The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms

After a long time of neglect, Artificial Intelligence is once again at the center of most of our political, economic, and socio-cultural debates. Recent advances in the field of Artifical Neural Networks have led to a renaissance of dystopian and utopian speculations on an AI-rendered future. Algorithmic technologies are deployed for identifying potential terrorists through vast surveillance networks, for producing sentencing guidelines and recidivism risk profiles in criminal justice systems, for demographic and psychographic targeting of bodies for advertising or propaganda, and more generally for automating the analysis of language, text, and images. Against this background, the aim of this book is to discuss the heterogenous conditions, implications, and effects of modern AI and Internet technologies in terms of their political dimension: What does it mean to critically investigate efforts of net politics in the age of machine learning algorithms

The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence

After a long time of neglect, Artificial Intelligence is once again at the center of most of our political, economic, and socio-cultural debates. Recent advances in the field of Artifical Neural Networks have led to a renaissance of dystopian and utopian speculations on an AI-rendered future. Algorithmic technologies are deployed for identifying potential terrorists through vast surveillance networks, for producing sentencing guidelines and recidivism risk profiles in criminal justice systems, for demographic and psychographic targeting of bodies for advertising or propaganda, and more generally for automating the analysis of language, text, and images. Against this background, the aim of this book is to discuss the heterogenous conditions, implications, and effects of modern AI and Internet technologies in terms of their political dimension: What does it mean to critically investigate efforts of net politics in the age of machine learning algorithms

Ethical and Unethical Hacking

The goal of this chapter is to provide a conceptual analysis of ethical, comprising history, common usage and the attempt to provide a systematic classification that is both compatible with common usage and normatively adequate. Subsequently, the article identifies a tension between common usage and a normativelyadequate nomenclature. ‘Ethical hackers’ are often identified with hackers that abide to a code of ethics privileging business-friendly values. However, there is no guarantee that respecting such values is always compatible with the all-things-considered morally best act. It is recognised, however, that in terms of assessment, it may be quite difficult to determine who is an ethical hacker in the ‘all things considered’ sense, while society may agree more easily on the determination of who is one in the ‘business-friendly’ limited sense. The article concludes by suggesting a pragmatic best-practice approach for characterising ethical hacking, which reaches beyond business-friendly values and helps in the taking of decisions that are respectful of the hackers’ individual ethics in morally debatable, grey zones