240 research outputs found

    Hitting Diamonds and Growing Cacti

    Full text link
    We consider the following NP-hard problem: in a weighted graph, find a minimum cost set of vertices whose removal leaves a graph in which no two cycles share an edge. We obtain a constant-factor approximation algorithm, based on the primal-dual method. Moreover, we show that the integrality gap of the natural LP relaxation of the problem is \Theta(\log n), where n denotes the number of vertices in the graph.Comment: v2: several minor changes

    Quick but Odd Growth of Cacti

    Get PDF
    Let F be a family of graphs. Given an input graph G and a positive integer k, testing whether G has a k-sized subset of vertices S, such that GS belongs to F, is a prototype vertex deletion problem. These type of problems have attracted a lot of attention in recent times in the domain of parameterized complexity. In this paper, we study two such problems; when F is either a family of cactus graphs or a family of odd-cactus graphs. A graph H is called a cactus graph if every pair of cycles in H intersect on at most one vertex. Furthermore, a cactus graph H is called an odd cactus, if every cycle of H is of odd length. Let us denote by C and C_{odd}, families of cactus and odd cactus, respectively. The vertex deletion problems corresponding to C and C_{odd} are called Diamond Hitting Set and Even Cycle Transversal, respectively. In this paper we design randomized algorithms with running time 12^{k}*n^{O(1)} for both these problems. Our algorithms considerably improve the running time for Diamond Hitting Set and Even Cycle Transversal, compared to what is known about them

    Hitting and Harvesting Pumpkins

    Full text link
    The "c-pumpkin" is the graph with two vertices linked by c>0 parallel edges. A c-pumpkin-model in a graph G is a pair A,B of disjoint subsets of vertices of G, each inducing a connected subgraph of G, such that there are at least c edges in G between A and B. We focus on covering and packing c-pumpkin-models in a given graph: On the one hand, we provide an FPT algorithm running in time 2^O(k) n^O(1) deciding, for any fixed c>0, whether all c-pumpkin-models can be covered by at most k vertices. This generalizes known single-exponential FPT algorithms for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set, which correspond to the cases c=1,2 respectively. On the other hand, we present a O(log n)-approximation algorithm for both the problems of covering all c-pumpkin-models with a smallest number of vertices, and packing a maximum number of vertex-disjoint c-pumpkin-models.Comment: v2: several minor change

    Hitting forbidden minors: Approximation and Kernelization

    Get PDF
    We study a general class of problems called F-deletion problems. In an F-deletion problem, we are asked whether a subset of at most kk vertices can be deleted from a graph GG such that the resulting graph does not contain as a minor any graph from the family F of forbidden minors. We obtain a number of algorithmic results on the F-deletion problem when F contains a planar graph. We give (1) a linear vertex kernel on graphs excluding tt-claw K1,tK_{1,t}, the star with tt leves, as an induced subgraph, where tt is a fixed integer. (2) an approximation algorithm achieving an approximation ratio of O(log3/2OPT)O(\log^{3/2} OPT), where OPTOPT is the size of an optimal solution on general undirected graphs. Finally, we obtain polynomial kernels for the case when F contains graph θc\theta_c as a minor for a fixed integer cc. The graph θc\theta_c consists of two vertices connected by cc parallel edges. Even though this may appear to be a very restricted class of problems it already encompasses well-studied problems such as {\sc Vertex Cover}, {\sc Feedback Vertex Set} and Diamond Hitting Set. The generic kernelization algorithm is based on a non-trivial application of protrusion techniques, previously used only for problems on topological graph classes

    Hitting Weighted Even Cycles in Planar Graphs

    Get PDF
    A classical branch of graph algorithms is graph transversals, where one seeks a minimum-weight subset of nodes in a node-weighted graph G which intersects all copies of subgraphs F from a fixed family F. Many such graph transversal problems have been shown to admit polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) for planar input graphs G, using a variety of techniques like the shifting technique (Baker, J. ACM 1994), bidimensionality (Fomin et al., SODA 2011), or connectivity domination (Cohen-Addad et al., STOC 2016). These techniques do not seem to apply to graph transversals with parity constraints, which have recently received significant attention, but for which no PTASs are known. In the even-cycle transversal (ECT) problem, the goal is to find a minimum-weight hitting set for the set of even cycles in an undirected graph. For ECT, Fiorini et al. (IPCO 2010) showed that the integrality gap of the standard covering LP relaxation is ?(log n), and that adding sparsity inequalities reduces the integrality gap to 10. Our main result is a primal-dual algorithm that yields a 47/7 ? 6.71-approximation for ECT on node-weighted planar graphs, and an integrality gap of the same value for the standard LP relaxation on node-weighted planar graphs

    A Constant-Factor Approximation for Weighted Bond Cover

    Get PDF
    The Weighted ?-Vertex Deletion for a class ? of graphs asks, weighted graph G, for a minimum weight vertex set S such that G-S ? ?. The case when ? is minor-closed and excludes some graph as a minor has received particular attention but a constant-factor approximation remained elusive for Weighted ?-Vertex Deletion. Only three cases of minor-closed ? are known to admit constant-factor approximations, namely Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Diamond Hitting Set. We study the problem for the class ? of ?_c-minor-free graphs, under the equivalent setting of the Weighted c-Bond Cover problem, and present a constant-factor approximation algorithm using the primal-dual method. For this, we leverage a structure theorem implicit in [Joret et al., SIDMA\u2714] which states the following: any graph G containing a ?_c-minor-model either contains a large two-terminal protrusion, or contains a constant-size ?_c-minor-model, or a collection of pairwise disjoint constant-sized connected sets that can be contracted simultaneously to yield a dense graph. In the first case, we tame the graph by replacing the protrusion with a special-purpose weighted gadget. For the second and third case, we provide a weighting scheme which guarantees a local approximation ratio. Besides making an important step in the quest of (dis)proving a constant-factor approximation for Weighted ?-Vertex Deletion, our result may be useful as a template for algorithms for other minor-closed families

    Chanticleer | Vol 6, Issue 2

    Get PDF
    https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/lib_ac_chanty/1605/thumbnail.jp

    The Courier, Volume 9, Issue 23, April 15, 1976

    Get PDF
    Stories: Blaha, Wood Win Kurt Morris, Trustee, Dies Start Probe in Use of Mail Permit New Board Members Facing Old Problems Jefferson Available Again on $2 Bill WDCB on the Air: That’s Us Next Fall Sheehan Honored by NJCAA People: James Blaha Wendell Wood Kurt Morris Al Vidas Steve Sheeha
    corecore