A Conserved GA Element in TATA-Less RNA Polymerase II Promoters

Initiation of RNA polymerase (Pol) II transcription requires assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) at the promoter. In the classical view, PIC assembly starts with binding of the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA box. However, a TATA box occurs in only 15% of promoters in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, posing the question how most yeast promoters nucleate PIC assembly. Here we show that one third of all yeast promoters contain a novel conserved DNA element, the GA element (GAE), that generally does not co-occur with the TATA box. The distance of the GAE to the transcription start site (TSS) resembles the distance of the TATA box to the TSS. The TATA-less TMT1 core promoter contains a GAE, recruits TBP, and supports formation of a TBP-TFIIB-DNA-complex. Mutation of the promoter region surrounding the GAE abolishes transcription in vivo and in vitro. A 32-nucleotide promoter region containing the GAE can functionally substitute for the TATA box in a TATA-containing promoter. This identifies the GAE as a conserved promoter element in TATA-less promoters

Hmo1 directs pre-initiation complex assembly to an appropriate site on its target gene promoters by masking a nucleosome-free region

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hmo1 binds to the promoters of ∼70% of ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) at high occupancy, but is observed at lower occupancy on the remaining RPG promoters. In Δhmo1 cells, the transcription start site (TSS) of the Hmo1-enriched RPS5 promoter shifted upstream, while the TSS of the Hmo1-limited RPL10 promoter did not shift. Analyses of chimeric RPS5/RPL10 promoters revealed a region between the RPS5 upstream activating sequence (UAS) and core promoter, termed the intervening region (IVR), responsible for strong Hmo1 binding and an upstream TSS shift in Δhmo1 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses showed that the RPS5-IVR resides within a nucleosome-free region and that pre-initiation complex (PIC) assembly occurs at a site between the IVR and a nucleosome overlapping the TSS (+1 nucleosome). The PIC assembly site was shifted upstream in Δhmo1 cells on this promoter, indicating that Hmo1 normally masks the RPS5-IVR to prevent PIC assembly at inappropriate site(s). This novel mechanism ensures accurate transcriptional initiation by delineating the 5′- and 3′-boundaries of the PIC assembly zone

Controlling gene expression with deep generative design of regulatory DNA

Design of de novo synthetic regulatory DNA is a promising avenue to control gene expression in biotechnology and medicine. Using mutagenesis typically requires screening sizable random DNA libraries, which limits the designs to span merely a short section of the promoter and restricts their control of gene expression. Here, we prototype a deep learning strategy based on generative adversarial networks (GAN) by learning directly from genomic and transcriptomic data. Our ExpressionGAN can traverse the entire regulatory sequence-expression landscape in a gene-specific manner, generating regulatory DNA with prespecified target mRNA levels spanning the whole gene regulatory structure including coding and adjacent non-coding regions. Despite high sequence divergence from natural DNA, in vivo measurements show that 57% of the highly-expressed synthetic sequences surpass the expression levels of highly-expressed natural controls. This demonstrates the applicability and relevance of deep generative design to expand our knowledge and control of gene expression regulation in any desired organism, condition or tissue

The Ribosomal Protein L23a Family of Arabidopsis thaliana

The 80 S cytoplasmic ribosome is the largest of three populations of ribosomes responsible for protein synthesis in plants. It is comprised of two RNA/protein subunits of unequal size: the small (40 S) subunit selects messages to be translated and performs proofreading, while the large (60 S) subunit has peptidyl transferase acitivity, adding new amino acids to the growing polypeptide. In the model flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis), four ribosomal RNAs and 81 ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) assemble to form the 80S ribosome. Although the Arabidopsis ribosome contains only a single copy of each of the 81 r-proteins (with the exception of small number of acidic phophoproteins), all r-proteins are encoded from multi-gene families containing two or more expressed members. Herein, I investigated r-protein paralogy in Arabidopsis via specific examination of a two member gene family, RPL23a. By analyzing patterns of reporter gene expression driven by full-length and truncated regulatory regions, I was able to identify a core promoter that is largely conserved between paralogs. Regulation was found to be complex, involving transcriptional, post-transcriptional and translational components. The effects of knocking-out a single RPL23a paralog (RPL23aB) were determined. Results indicated that this paralog is broadly dispensable, and Arabidopsis does not compensate for its loss at the transcriptional level. Subcellular localization was investigated by tagging RPL23aA/B with fluorescent proteins, demonstrating that RPL23aA is targeted to nucleolus more efficiently than RPL23aB, possibly due to a stronger nucleolar localization signal. RNA-interference was used to individually silence RPL23a paralogs to characterize functional overlap. Results showed that RPL23aA, and not RPL23aB, is required for normal development. Mutants with reduced levels of RPL23aA develop a pointed first leaf phenotype that I postulate may be due to disruption of miRNA-mediated degradation of specific auxin response genes. Lastly, the 26 S proteasome was inhibited to determine the importance of protein turnover in regulating RPL23a levels. Findings suggest that proteasome-mediated degradation of RPL23a is essential for preventing accumulation of unincorporated r-proteins. Overall, results indicate that the Arabidopsis RPL23a paralogs have diverged from each other: RPL23aA has become the predominant paralog, while RPL23aB functions in an anciliary capacity and/or is undergoing neofunctionalization

Analysis of TAF II Function in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Transcription by RNA polymerase II is a highly regulated process requiring a number of general and promoter specific transcription factors. Although many of the factors involved in the transcription reaction are known, exactly how they function to stimulate or repress transcription is not well understood. Central to understanding gene regulation is understanding the mechanism by which promoter specific transcription activators (activators) stimulate transcription. A group of factors called coactivators have been shown to be required for activator function in vitro. The best characterized coactivators to date are members of the TFIID complex. TFIID is a multisubunit complex composed of the TATA box binding protein (TBP) and 8-12 TBP associated factors (TAFIIs). Results from numerous in vitro experiments indicate that TAFIIs function by binding to activators and forming a bridge between the activator and the basal transcription machinery. In order to gain insight into the mechanism by which activators stimulate transcription, we chose to analyze the in vivo function of TAFIIs, their proposed targets. Results from the genetic disruption of a number of TAFIIs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae showed that most are encoded by essential genes. In order to study their function, temperature-sensitive and conditional alleles were constructed. Cells depleted of individual TAFIIs by either of these two methods displayed no defect in global transcription activation. Inactivation of yTAFII17, however, resulted in a promoter specific defect. In addition, inactivation of yTAFII145, yTAFII90, or TSM1, resulted in an inability of cells to progress through the cell-cycle. In an attempt to identify genes whose expression required yTAFII90, we performed subtractive hybridization on strains containing wild-type and temperature-sensitive alleles. Although this technique successfully identified genes differentially expressed in the two strains, it failed to identify genes whose expression required yTAFII90. These results indicate that TAFIIs are not the obligatory targets of activators, and that other factors must provide this role in vivo. Furthermore, that many of TAFIIs are required for cell-cycle progression

The role of SUMO in regulating TATA-binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A proteomic screen to identify novel SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) substrates in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed the TATA-binding protein (TBP) as a candidate. TBP is a ubiquitous transcription factor required for transcription by the three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. TBP was confirmed to be SUMOylated in vivo using affinity purification techniques. Lysine (K) residues in the N terminus were confirmed to be the SUMO-accepting sites, suggesting the existence of a “SUMO region” in the N-terminal domain of TBP. Among the six lysine residues identified, K47 was a strong SUMOylation site. I generated TBP SUMO-deficient mutants to interrogate the functional role of TBP SUMOylation. The mutants showed much higher protein stability. Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis revealed that the occupancy of TBP SUMO mutants at promoters of both constitutive and inducible genes were much lower than TBP wildtype, with a lower recruitment efficiency. Cross-linking kinetic (CLK) analysis further proved that the lower promoter occupancy of the SUMO mutants was caused by lower promoter dynamics. This was supported by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays, which showed a larger immobile population for the TBP SUMO-deficient mutants. The lower promoter dynamics is expected to lead to lower transcription plasticity and/or aberrant transcriptional output. Consistent with this, cells expressing either type of TBP mutant exhibit significant defects during sporulation, which is a cellular process involving genome-wide transcription reprogramming.Open Acces