502 research outputs found

    Analysis of stray current induced by cathodic protection on steel-framed masonry structures

    Get PDF
    Cathodic protection (CP) has been successfully employed to protect steel-framed masonry buildings from corrosion related damage. When a CP system is installed to protect the structural members, other metallic items which are within the fabric of the structure but are not in direct electrical continuity may suffer from stray current interactions, resulting in accelerated corrosion of the discontinuous items. Therefore, these must be considered when CP systems are designed prior to installation. This paper presents both experimental and numerical studies into the risk and extent of stray current corrosion in steel-framed masonry structures when subject to impressed current cathodic protection. The objective is to allow CP systems to be optimised so that interference is minimised without compromising the technical or cost benefits of this method of corrosion control

    Cathodic protection of steel framed masonry structures - experimental and numerical studies

    Get PDF
    Many high-profile steel-framed masonry buildings are susceptible to extensive damage as a result of corrosion of the steel frame. This has resulted in serious consequences with respect to serviceability, safety, aesthetics and heritage. Cathodic protection (CP) is a proven method for preventing and protecting buried and submerged steel and reinforced concrete structures from corrosion. More recently, the method has been introduced to prevent and control corrosion in steel-framed masonry structures. However, despite several sizeable CP installations around the world, there are no formal guidelines for the design, installation and operation of such systems and much of the knowledge is based on empirical observations. This paper presents both experimental and numerical studies on the cathodic protection of representative steel framed masonry structures. These studies are considered essential in the understanding of the mechanisms of cathodic protection and the design of optimised cathodic protection systems for such structures

    HIGH-ORDER INTEGRAL EQUATION METHODS FOR QUASI-MAGNETOSTATIC AND CORROSION-RELATED FIELD ANALYSIS WITH MARITIME APPLICATIONS

    Get PDF
    This dissertation presents techniques for high-order simulation of electromagnetic fields, particularly for problems involving ships with ferromagnetic hulls and active corrosion-protection systems. A set of numerically constrained hexahedral basis functions for volume integral equation discretization is presented in a method-of-moments context. Test simulations demonstrate the accuracy achievable with these functions as well as the improvement brought about in system conditioning when compared to other basis sets. A general method for converting between a locally-corrected Nystrรถm discretization of an integral equation and a method-of-moments discretization is presented next. Several problems involving conducting and magnetic-conducting materials are solved to verify the accuracy of the method and to illustrate both the reduction in number of unknowns and the effect of the numerically constrained bases on the conditioning of the converted matrix. Finally, a surface integral equation derived from Laplaceโ€™s equation is discretized using the locally-corrected Nystrรถm method in order to calculate the electric fields created by impressed-current corrosion protection systems. An iterative technique is presented for handling nonlinear boundary conditions. In addition we examine different approaches for calculating the magnetic field radiated by the corrosion protection system. Numerical tests show the accuracy achievable by higher-order discretizations, validate the iterative technique presented. Various methods for magnetic field calculation are also applied to basic test cases

    A study on the effect of the impressed current cathodic protection system in reinforced concrete structures

    Get PDF
    Reinforced concrete has been used as a construction material at variable fields related to our life such as air port, bridge, and ocean concrete structure, etc. The rebar in the concrete is protected from the corrosion because the passive layer is formed by high alkaline environment. Over the time, however, the rebar in the concrete is prone to corrode according to the corrosive environment and the structure of the concrete building. For example, the chloride ion plays a key role in corrosion process because it breaks the passive layer on the rebar and accelerates the corrosion rate. Besides, the volume of rebar is increased by the consequence of corrosion and then the concrete is spalled simultaneously. The cathodic protection was invented and used widely to protect rebars in the reinforced concrete structure against the corrosion. Additionally, The cathodic protection is divided to Sacrificial Anode Cathodic Protection (SACP) and Impressed Current Cathodic Protection (ICCP). Although ICCP system is expensive to install initially and is complex, this is applied more frequently to impede the corrosion in reinforced concrete structure than SACP. It explains roughly; ICCP supplies the protection current from the anode to the cathode (rebar) and then it prevents the corrosion of rebar and delays the corrosion rate. In complex RC structure, there are limitations on SACP system such as concrete resistivity, throwing power of CP and experimental environment, so it is difficult to expect to protect perfectly. Therefore, it needs to investigate the major factors having effect on the whole protection in complex structure of the building. However, ICCP is exploited as a practical way primarily to protect the corrosion of rebar in the concrete these days. For this study, the anode such as Ti-Mesh, Ti-Rod and Ti-Ribbon was installed on the reinforced concrete specimen of beam and slab type. In addition, the electrochemical test was conducted to confirm the cathodic protection performance depending to the exposed environment and the kind of anode in RC structure applied with ICCP ; E-log i, cathodic protection potential, depolarization, cathodic protection current. The following results have been obtained through the present study about the cathodic protection efficiency : 1) The E-log i test was conducted to affirm the standard of cathodic protection potential on the beam type specimen according to the environment. The standard value of cathodic protection potential was measured to about 90 ~ 140 mV. Besides, the value depending on the corrosive environment was inclined to increase slightly in order of atmosphere, fresh water and 3% NaCl solution. However, the kind of anode for ICCP nearly had no effect on the cathodic protection efficiency. 2) The cathodic protection potential was gauged by the galvanicstatic method on the beam type specimen applied with ICCP. The shape of anode had not major effect on the behavior of cathodic protection potential. In addition, the value of protection potential was tended to decrease in order of atmosphere, fresh water and 3% NaCl solution and then it was trivial difference between them. 3) The cathodic protection current was measured by the potentiostatic method after applying with ICCP on the beam type specimen and the degree of cathodic protection current was increased by all anodes in order of atmosphere, fresh water and 3% NaCl solution. 4) The degree of depolarization was investigated on beam type specimen. The IR-Drop was the highest in atmosphere because of the concrete resistivity. On the other hand, it was the lowest in the 3% NaCl solution. Moreover, when the corrosiveness of experimental environment was higher(more severe), the real degree of depolarization except IR-Drop was more increased by concrete resistivity. 5) The cathodic protection potential was evaluated on the slab type specimen. When the distance from the anode to the rebar(cathode) is closer, the protection potential was lower by the concrete resistivity. Additionally, the potential difference represented proportionally 50 mV per 60 mm which was the distance between rebars. 6) In protecting the slab type specimen by ICCP, as the distance between the location of rebar and the anode was farther, the concrete resistivity was increased more and then the supply of protection current was limited. However, after installing the anode at regular distance supplementarily, the unprotected rebar was enabled to protect well totally. 7) As the results of protecting the slab type specimen by ICCP, it would be able to find the maximum protection distance which is about 150 mm to the rebar from the anode. That is, the anode should be installed at interval of about 300 mm to protect the whole rebars uniformly without the unprotected area. It was found through the above results that the shape of anode used by ICCP had insignificant effect on the protection efficiency. The protection efficiency of ICCP was changed in accordance with the spacing between the anode and rebar, and the location of anode. So, it should consider those points throughly in designing the impressed current cathodic protection. In addition, when the proper cathodic protection is applied to the reinforced concrete structures, the enormous economic problems by the corrosion will be resolved as well as the safety for human life.|์ฒ ๊ทผ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ๋Š” ๊ฑด์ถ• ์žฌ๋ฃŒ๋กœ์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์‚ถ๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ ๊ณตํ•ญ, ๊ต๋Ÿ‰, ํ•ด์–‘ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ์žˆ๋Š” ์ฒ ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ํŠน์œ ์˜ ๊ณ  ์•Œ์นด๋ฆฌ์„ฑ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ฒ ๊ทผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋ถ€๋™ํƒœ ํ”ผ๋ง‰์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋ถ€์‹์„ ํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ถ€์‹์„ฑ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฒ ๊ทผ์€ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ถ€์‹๋œ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค๋ฉด, ์—ผ์†Œ ์ด์˜จ์€ ์ฒ ๊ทผ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜ ๋ถ€๋™ํƒœ ํ”ผ๋ง‰์„ ํŒŒ๊ดดํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ€์‹์†๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๋ถ€์‹์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, ๋ถ€์‹์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ฒ ๊ทผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋™์‹œ์— ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ๋ถ€์„œ์ง ๋ฐ ํƒˆ๋ฝํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ ๊ทผ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, ์Œ๊ทน ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์€ ํฌ์ƒ์–‘๊ทน์‹๊ณผ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰œ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋ก ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์€ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์„ค์น˜ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค๋ฉฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์ฒ ๊ทผ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํฌ์ƒ์–‘๊ทน์‹ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹ ์Œ๊ทน ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐ„๋žตํžˆ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋‚ด์˜ ์Œ๊ทน๊ณผ ์–‘๊ทน ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฐฉ์‹ ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋Šฆ์ถฐ์ฃผ๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ฒ ๊ทผ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํฌ์ƒ์–‘๊ทน์‹ ์Œ๊ทน ๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์€ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋น„์ €ํ•ญ, ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋ ฅ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹คํ—˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ•ด ์š”์†Œ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์™„๋ฒฝํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ ๋œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์˜ ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹๋ฒ•์€ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ์ฒ ๊ทผ์„ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚ ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ Ti-Mesh, Ti-Rod, Ti-Ribbon ์–‘๊ทน์„ ๋ณด(Beam) ๋ฐ ์Šฌ๋žฉ(Slab) ํ˜•์‹์˜ ์ฒ ๊ทผ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์— ์„ค์น˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›๋ฒ•์ด ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์ฒ ๊ทผ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๋…ธ์ถœํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ E-log i, ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„, ๋ณต๊ทน ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์Œ๊ทน ๋ฐฉ์‹ ์ „๋ฅ˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ „๊ธฐํ™”ํ•™์ ์ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1) ๋ณด ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ณ„ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹ ์ „์œ„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ E-log i ์ธก์ • ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹ ์ „์œ„๊ธฐ์ค€ ๊ฐ’์€ ์•ฝ 90~140 mV ๋กœ ์ธก์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ถ€์‹ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ณ„๋กœ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹ ์ „์œ„๊ธฐ์ค€ ๊ฐ’์€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ, ์ฒญ์ˆ˜, ํ•ด์ˆ˜ ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋‚˜ ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์™€๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2) ์ •์ „๋ฅ˜๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์— ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ํ›„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„ ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„๊ฑฐ๋™์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ€์‹ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ณ„๋กœ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธฐ, ์ฒญ์ˆ˜, ํ•ด์ˆ˜ ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„ ๊ฐ’์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ํฌ์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. 3) ์ •์ „์œ„๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์— ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ํ›„ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „๋ฅ˜ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 3 ์ข…์˜ ์–‘๊ทน ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ณต๊ธฐ, ์ฒญ์ˆ˜, ํ•ด์ˆ˜ ์ˆœ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „๋ฅ˜๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 4) ๋ณด ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์—์„œ ๋ณต๊ทน๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋น„์ €ํ•ญ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ „์••๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๊ณ , 3% ์—ผ์ˆ˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ถ€์‹์„ฑ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ฐ€ํ˜นํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋น„์ €ํ•ญ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ „์••๊ฐ•ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐฐ์ œํ•œ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ณต๊ทน๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋”์šฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 5) ์Šฌ๋žฉ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„ ์ธก์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๋น„์ €ํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒ ๊ทผ์˜ ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ์–‘๊ทน์—์„œ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šธ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „์œ„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒ ๊ทผ์ด ๋ฐฐ๊ทผ๋œ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ 60 mm๋‹น ์•ฝ 50 mV์”ฉ ๋น„๋ก€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์œ„์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 6) ์Šฌ๋žฉ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์„ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฒ ๊ทผ์˜ ์œ„์น˜๊ฐ€ ์–‘๊ทน๊ณผ ๋ฉ€์–ด์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ์˜ ๋น„์ €ํ•ญ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ „๋ฅ˜์˜ ๊ณต๊ธ‰์ด ์ œํ•œ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ์ผ์ • ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์–‘๊ทน์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฏธ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋˜์—ˆ๋˜ ์ฒ ๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 7) ์Šฌ๋žฉ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์„ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์–‘๊ทน์ด ์„ค์น˜๋œ ์œ„์น˜์—์„œ ์•ฝ 150 mm ๋–จ์–ด์ง„ ์ฒ ๊ทผ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ฏธ๋ฐฉ์‹๋˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์ด ์—†์ด ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์‹œํ—˜ํŽธ์„ ๊ท ์ผํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฉ์‹ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์–‘๊ทน์„ ์•ฝ 300 mm ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ์€ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›๋ฒ•์€ ์–‘๊ทน๊ณผ ์ฒ ๊ทผ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ ๋ฐ ์–‘๊ทน์˜ ์„ค์น˜์œ„์น˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์™ธ๋ถ€์ „์›์‹ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹ ์„ค๊ณ„ ์‹œ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ๋‹ค๊ฐ€, ์ฒ ๊ทผ ์ฝ˜ํฌ๋ฆฌํŠธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์Œ๊ทน๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ธ๋ช…์•ˆ์ „ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฆฌ๋ผ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋œ๋‹ค.Table of contents i List of tables iii List of figures iv Abstract vii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter 2 BACKGROUND 4 2.1 Corrosion basics 4 2.1.1 Definition of corrosion 4 2.1.2 Thermodynamic and electrode potential 6 2.1.3 Electrochemical reactions in aqueous 11 2.1.4 Polarization 13 2.1.5 Passivity 18 2.2 Corrosion of steel in reinforced concrete 21 2.3 Corrosion of steel by chloride in reinforced concrete 24 2.4 Cathodic protection of reinforced concrete 26 2.4.1 Sacrificial Anode Cathodic Protection (SACP) 26 2.4.2 Impressed Current Cathodic Protection (ICCP) 29 Chapter 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 31 3.1 Availability of cathodic protection in reinforced concrete 31 3.2 Effect of CP in chloride environment 35 3.3 Arrangement and type of anode for ICCP in RC 39 Chapter 4 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 45 4.1 Specimens 45 4.2 Manufacture of anodes for ICCP and installation 48 4.3 Installation of test devices 50 4.4 Procedures & analysis 53 4.4.1 Measurement of E-log i on the specimens 53 4.4.2 Measurement of cathodic protection potential 55 4.4.3 Measurement of depolarization potential 56 4.4.4 Measurement of cathodic protection current 57 Chapter 5 RESULTS & DISCUSSION 58 5.1 Results of measuring E-log i on the beam type specimens 58 5.2 Results of measuring cathodic protection potential 60 5.3 Results of measuring depolarization potential on the beam type specimens 62 5.4 Results of measuring depolarization potential on the slab type specimens 66 5.5 Results of measuring cathodic protection current 70 Chapter 6 CONCLUSION 73 Reference 76Maste

    Performance Assessment Of Sacrificial Anode Cathodic Protection Of Subsea Pipeline

    Get PDF
    The integrity of subsea pipeline depends mostly on the applied corrosion control. One of the corrosion control methods is using sacrificial anode cathodic protection, SACP. The performance of sacrificial anode cathodic protection is measured by the current supply and the operational life of the anode to protect the pipeline. In order to maintain the integrity of sacrificial anode cathodic protection, frequent inspection has been taken. However, there are no further assessment or analysis towards the performance of anode. The condition protection system only relies on the subjective data provide by the inspector. This study include aluminium and zinc as the sacrificial anode and carbon steel API 5L X65 as the cathode. The Objective of this study is to analyse on the corrosion rate of aluminium and zinc as well as to determine the most effective metal as a function of sacrificial anode metal. In this study, data are gathered from PETRONAS Carigali Sdn. Bhd. Peninsular Malaysia Operation, PCSB PMO. Two of their operating pipeline with different type of anode were selected and have been analysed on the corrosion rate of the sacrificial anode cathodic protection. Other than that, this study also includes data from laboratory simulation which are Linear Polarization Resistance test and weight loss test. As a reference, Det Norske Veritas, DNV RP B401 was used in order to design the sacrificial anode cathodic protection. Based on the results, it has been found that the corrosion rate of aluminium is higher than the other metals that are carbon steel API 5L X65 and zinc. To conclude this study, aluminium is found to be the most effective metal as sacrificial anode cathodic protection based on the corrosion rate, operational life and the current supplied by the metal

    Disseny de protecciรณ catรฒdica d'estructures offshore/mร ster

    Get PDF
    Based on the standpoint of the environment, corrosion is an environmental occurrence that is required to maintain the natural balance. From the engineerโ€™s standpoint, this natural balance is observed as a damaging natural attack on a metal by an electrochemical reaction. This natural attack has various types such as uniform, crevice or pitting corrosion and it results in severe material loss, which contributes to lost production and increased maintenance, repair, and replacement costs, as well as restoration costs. Hence, prevention of corrosion is quite significant for metal to be applied in an offshore platform

    Cathodic Protection Attenuation Near Tidal Zone Area

    Get PDF
    Pipeline is widely used in the offshore industry to transport all the oil and gas product from the offshore platforms to the onshore facilities. Large investment has been made by most oil and gas company in order to make sure offshore pipelines could last for their design life. So far, cathodic protection system and coating protection are the best solution in order to control the corrosion process along the pipeline. Over the years, cathodic protection has doing great in controlling the corrosion process for all offshore pipeline which either been buried or being laid in the deep water. However, the corrosion problems for pipelines near tidal zone area seems to have been overlook by the people in this industry. All these years, pipeline coating has been widely used in order to protect the pipeline in the tidal zone area. Generally, this research will study and analyze the response of cathodic protection system near tidal zone area. It will focused more on finding out the cathodic protection potential at tidal zone area close to shoreline. A few equations is being used and adapted with cathodic protection design from PETRONAS PMO in order to find out the dissipation of cathodic protection potential at tidal zone area. It seems that sacrificial anode does not function effectively in tidal zone area due to the absence of stable seawater electrolyte. Sacrificial anode needs a stable electrolyte around the metalwork to enable the anode to function effectively
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore