65,066 research outputs found
Automated Mapping of UML Activity Diagrams to Formal Specifications for Supporting Containment Checking
Business analysts and domain experts are often sketching the behaviors of a
software system using high-level models that are technology- and
platform-independent. The developers will refine and enrich these high-level
models with technical details. As a consequence, the refined models can deviate
from the original models over time, especially when the two kinds of models
evolve independently. In this context, we focus on behavior models; that is, we
aim to ensure that the refined, low-level behavior models conform to the
corresponding high-level behavior models. Based on existing formal verification
techniques, we propose containment checking as a means to assess whether the
system's behaviors described by the low-level models satisfy what has been
specified in the high-level counterparts. One of the major obstacles is how to
lessen the burden of creating formal specifications of the behavior models as
well as consistency constraints, which is a tedious and error-prone task when
done manually. Our approach presented in this paper aims at alleviating the
aforementioned challenges by considering the behavior models as verification
inputs and devising automated mappings of behavior models onto formal
properties and descriptions that can be directly used by model checkers. We
discuss various challenges in our approach and show the applicability of our
approach in illustrative scenarios.Comment: In Proceedings FESCA 2014, arXiv:1404.043
Automating FEA programming
In this paper we briefly describe a combined symbolic and numeric approach for solving mathematical models on parallel computers. An experimental software system, PIER, is being developed in Common Lisp to synthesize computationally intensive and domain formulation dependent phases of finite element analysis (FEA) solution methods. Quantities for domain formulation like shape functions, element stiffness matrices, etc., are automatically derived using symbolic mathematical computations. The problem specific information and derived formulae are then used to generate (parallel) numerical code for FEA solution steps. A constructive approach to specify a numerical program design is taken. The code generator compiles application oriented input specifications into (parallel) FORTRAN77 routines with the help of built-in knowledge of the particular problem, numerical solution methods and the target computer
A Domain-Specific Language and Editor for Parallel Particle Methods
Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are of increasing importance in scientific
high-performance computing to reduce development costs, raise the level of
abstraction and, thus, ease scientific programming. However, designing and
implementing DSLs is not an easy task, as it requires knowledge of the
application domain and experience in language engineering and compilers.
Consequently, many DSLs follow a weak approach using macros or text generators,
which lack many of the features that make a DSL a comfortable for programmers.
Some of these features---e.g., syntax highlighting, type inference, error
reporting, and code completion---are easily provided by language workbenches,
which combine language engineering techniques and tools in a common ecosystem.
In this paper, we present the Parallel Particle-Mesh Environment (PPME), a DSL
and development environment for numerical simulations based on particle methods
and hybrid particle-mesh methods. PPME uses the meta programming system (MPS),
a projectional language workbench. PPME is the successor of the Parallel
Particle-Mesh Language (PPML), a Fortran-based DSL that used conventional
implementation strategies. We analyze and compare both languages and
demonstrate how the programmer's experience can be improved using static
analyses and projectional editing. Furthermore, we present an explicit domain
model for particle abstractions and the first formal type system for particle
methods.Comment: Submitted to ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software on Dec. 25,
201
Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Domain-Specific Language Design and Implementation (DSLDI 2015)
The goal of the DSLDI workshop is to bring together researchers and
practitioners interested in sharing ideas on how DSLs should be designed,
implemented, supported by tools, and applied in realistic application contexts.
We are both interested in discovering how already known domains such as graph
processing or machine learning can be best supported by DSLs, but also in
exploring new domains that could be targeted by DSLs. More generally, we are
interested in building a community that can drive forward the development of
modern DSLs. These informal post-proceedings contain the submitted talk
abstracts to the 3rd DSLDI workshop (DSLDI'15), and a summary of the panel
discussion on Language Composition
- …