Transition to SDN is HARMLESS: Hybrid ARchitecture for Migrating Legacy Ethernet Switches to SDN

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) offers a new way to operate, manage, and deploy communication networks and to overcome many long-standing problems of legacy networking. However, widespread SDN adoption has not occurred yet due to the lack of a viable incremental deployment path and the relatively immature present state of SDN-capable devices on the market. While continuously evolving software switches may alleviate the operational issues of commercial hardware-based SDN offerings, namely lagging standards-compliance, performance regressions, and poor scaling, they fail to match the cost-efficiency and port density. In this paper, we propose HARMLESS, a new SDN switch design that seamlessly adds SDN capability to legacy network gear, by emulating the OpenFlow switch OS in a separate software switch component. This way, HARMLESS enables a quick and easy leap into SDN, combining the rapid innovation and upgrade cycles of software switches with the port density and cost-efficiency of hardware-based appliances into a fully dataplane-transparent and vendor-neutral solution. HARMLESS incurs an order of magnitude smaller initial expenditure for an SDN deployment than existing turnkey vendor SDN solutions while, at the same time, yields matching, or even better, data plane performance for smaller enterprises

Stateful Data Plane Abstractions for Software-Defined Networks and Their Applications

RESUMÉ Le Software-Defined Networking (SDN) permet la programmation du réseau. Malheureusement, la technologie SDN actuelle limite la programmabilité uniquement au plan de contrôle. Les opérateurs ne peuvent pas programmer des algorithmes du plan de données tels que l’équilibrage de charge, le contrôle de congestion, la détection de pannes, etc. Ces fonctions sont implémentées à l’aide d’hardware dédié, car elles doivent fonctionner au taux de ligne, c’est-à-dire 10-100 Gbit/s sur 10-100 ports. Dans ce travail, nous présentons deux abstractions de plan de données pour le traitement de paquets à états (stateful), OpenState et OPP. OpenState est une extension d’OpenFlow qui permet la définition des règles de flux en tant que machines à états finis. OPP est une abstraction plus flexible qui généralise OpenState en ajoutant des capacités de calcul, permettant la programmation d’algorithmes de plan de données plus avancés. OpenState et OPP sont à la fois disponibles pour les implémentations d’haute performance en utilisant des composants de commutateurs hardware courants. Cependant, les deux abstractions sont basées sur un choix de design problématique : l’utilisation d’une boucle de rétroaction dans le pipeline de traitement des paquets. Cette boucle, si elle n’est pas correctement contrôlée, peut nuire à la cohérence des opérations d’état. Les approches de verrouillage de la mémoire peuvent être utilisées pour éviter les incohérences, au détriment du débit. Nous présentons des résultats de simulations sur des traces de trafic réelles, montrant que les boucles de rétroaction de plusieurs cycles d’horloge peuvent être supportées avec peu ou pas de dégradation des performances, même avec les charges de travail des plus défavorables. Pour mieux prouver les avantages d’un plan de données programmables, nous présentons deux nouvelles applications : Spider et FDPA. Spider permet de détecter et de réagir aux pannes de réseau aux échelles temporelles du plan de données (i.e., micro/nanosecondes), également dans le cas de pannes à distance. En utilisant OpenState, Spider fournit des fonctionnalités équivalentes aux protocoles de plans de contrôle anciens tels que BFD et MPLS Fast Reroute, mais sans nécessiter un plan de contrôle.---------- ABSTRACT Software-Defined Networking (SDN) enables programmability in the network. Unfortunately, current SDN limits programmability only to the control plane. Operators cannot program data plane algorithms such as load balancing, congestion control, failure detection, etc. These capabilities are usually baked in the switch via dedicated hardware, as they need to run at line rate, i.e. 10-100 Gbit/s on 10-100 ports. In this work, we present two data plane abstractions for stateful packet processing, namely OpenState and OPP. These abstractions allow operators to program data plane tasks that involve stateful processing. OpenState is an extension to OpenFlow that permits the definition of forwarding rules as finite state machines. OPP is a more flexible abstraction that generalizes OpenState by adding computational capabilities, opening for the programming of more advanced data plane algorithms. Both OpenState and OPP are amenable for highperformance hardware implementations by using commodity hardware switch components. However, both abstractions are based on a problematic design choice: to use a feedback-loop in the processing pipeline. This loop, if not adequately controlled, can represent a harm for the consistency of the state operations. Memory locking approaches can be used to prevent inconsistencies, at the expense of throughput. We present simulation results on real traffic traces showing that feedback-loops of several clock cycles can be supported with little or no performance degradation, even with near-worst case traffic workloads. To further prove the benefits of a stateful programmable data plane, we present two novel applications: Spider and FDPA. Spider permits to detect and react to network failures at data plane timescales, i.e. micro/nanoseconds, also in the case of distant failures. By using OpenState, Spider provides functionalities equivalent to legacy control plane protocols such as BFD and MPLS Fast Reroute, but without the need of a control plane. That is, both detection and rerouting happen entirely in the data plane. FDPA allows a switch to enforce approximate fair bandwidth sharing among many TCP-like senders. Most of the mechanisms to solve this problem are based on complex scheduling algorithms, whose feasibility becomes very expensive with today’s line rate requirements. FDPA, which is based on OPP, trades scheduling complexity with per-user state. FDPA works by dynamically assigning users to few (3-4) priority queues, where the priority is chosen based on the sending rate history of a user

Hybrid SDN Evolution: A Comprehensive Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is an evolutionary networking paradigm which has been adopted by large network and cloud providers, among which are Tech Giants. However, embracing a new and futuristic paradigm as an alternative to well-established and mature legacy networking paradigm requires a lot of time along with considerable financial resources and technical expertise. Consequently, many enterprises can not afford it. A compromise solution then is a hybrid networking environment (a.k.a. Hybrid SDN (hSDN)) in which SDN functionalities are leveraged while existing traditional network infrastructures are acknowledged. Recently, hSDN has been seen as a viable networking solution for a diverse range of businesses and organizations. Accordingly, the body of literature on hSDN research has improved remarkably. On this account, we present this paper as a comprehensive state-of-the-art survey which expands upon hSDN from many different perspectives

DESIGN OF RELIABLE AND SUSTAINABLE WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: CHALLENGES, PROTOCOLS AND CASE STUDIES

Integrated with the function of sensing, processing, and wireless communication, wireless sensors are attracting strong interest for a variety of monitoring and control applications. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been deployed for industrial and remote monitoring purposes. As energy shortage is a worldwide problem, more attention has been placed on incorporating energy harvesting devices in WSNs. The main objective of this research is to systematically study the design principles and technical approaches to address three key challenges in designing reliable and sustainable WSNs; namely, communication reliability, operation with extremely low and dynamic power sources, and multi-tier network architecture. Mathematical throughput models, sustainable WSN communication strategies, and multi-tier network architecture are studied in this research to address these challenges, leading to protocols for reliable communication, energy-efficient operation, and network planning for specific application requirements. To account for realistic operating conditions, the study has implemented three distinct WSN testbeds: a WSN attached to the high-speed rotating spindle of a turning lathe, a WSN powered by a microbial fuel cell based energy harvesting system, and a WSN with a multi-tier network architecture. With each testbed, models and protocols are extracted, verified and analyzed. Extensive research has studied low power WSNs and energy harvesting capabilities. Despite these efforts, some important questions have not been well understood. This dissertation addresses the following three dimensions of the challenge. First, for reliable communication protocol design, mathematical throughput or energy efficiency estimation models are essential, yet have not been investigated accounting for specific application environment characteristics and requirements. Second, for WSNs with energy harvesting power sources, most current networking protocols do not work efficiently with the systems considered in this dissertation, such as those powered by extremely low and dynamic energy sources. Third, for multi-tier wireless network system design, routing protocols that are adaptive to real-world network conditions have not been studied. This dissertation focuses on these questions and explores experimentally derived mathematical models for designing protocols to meet specific application requirements. The main contributions of this research are 1) for industrial wireless sensor systems with fast-changing but repetitive mobile conditions, understand the performance and optimal choice of reliable wireless sensor data transmission methods, 2) for ultra-low energy harvesting wireless sensor devices, design an energy neutral communication protocol, and 3) for distributed rural wireless sensor systems, understand the efficiency of realistic routing in a multi-tier wireless network. Altogether, knowledge derived from study of the systems, models, and protocols in this work fuels the establishment of a useful framework for designing future WSNs

Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey

peer reviewedThe Internet has led to the creation of a digital society, where (almost) everything is connected and is accessible from anywhere. However, despite their widespread adoption, traditional IP networks are complex and very hard to manage. It is both difficult to configure the network according to predefined policies, and to reconfigure it to respond to faults, load, and changes. To make matters even more difficult, current networks are also vertically integrated: the control and data planes are bundled together. Software-defined networking (SDN) is an emerging paradigm that promises to change this state of affairs, by breaking vertical integration, separating the network's control logic from the underlying routers and switches, promoting (logical) centralization of network control, and introducing the ability to program the network. The separation of concerns, introduced between the definition of network policies, their implementation in switching hardware, and the forwarding of traffic, is key to the desired flexibility: by breaking the network control problem into tractable pieces, SDN makes it easier to create and introduce new abstractions in networking, simplifying network management and facilitating network evolution. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on SDN. We start by introducing the motivation for SDN, explain its main concepts and how it differs from traditional networking, its roots, and the standardization activities regarding this novel paradigm. Next, we present the key building blocks of an SDN infrastructure using a bottom-up, layered approach. We provide an in-depth analysis of the hardware infrastructure, southbound and northbound application programming interfaces (APIs), network virtualization layers, network operating systems (SDN controllers), network programming languages, and network applications. We also look at cross-layer problems such as debugging and troubleshooting. In an effort to anticipate the future evolution of this - ew paradigm, we discuss the main ongoing research efforts and challenges of SDN. In particular, we address the design of switches and control platforms—with a focus on aspects such as resiliency, scalability, performance, security, and dependability—as well as new opportunities for carrier transport networks and cloud providers. Last but not least, we analyze the position of SDN as a key enabler of a software-defined environment