288 research outputs found

    Altimetry, gravimetry, GPS and viscoelastic modeling data for the joint inversion for glacial isostatic adjustment in Antarctica (ESA STSE Project REGINA)

    Get PDF
    The poorly known correction for the ongoing deformation of the solid Earth caused by glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is a major uncertainty in determining the mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet from measurements of satellite gravimetry and to a lesser extent satellite altimetry. In the past decade, much progress has been made in consistently modeling ice sheet and solid Earth interactions; however, forward-modeling solutions of GIA in Antarctica remain uncertain due to the sparsity of constraints on the ice sheet evolution, as well as the Earth's rheological properties. An alternative approach towards estimating GIA is the joint inversion of multiple satellite data โ€“ namely, satellite gravimetry, satellite altimetry and GPS, which reflect, with different sensitivities, trends in recent glacial changes and GIA. Crucial to the success of this approach is the accuracy of the space-geodetic data sets. Here, we present reprocessed rates of surface-ice elevation change (Envisat/Ice, Cloud,and land Elevation Satellite, ICESat; 2003โ€“2009), gravity field change (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, GRACE; 2003โ€“2009) and bedrock uplift (GPS; 1995โ€“2013). The data analysis is complemented by the forward modeling of viscoelastic response functions to disc load forcing, allowing us to relate GIA-induced surface displacements with gravity changes for different rheological parameters of the solid Earth. The data and modeling results presented here are available in the PANGAEA database (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.875745). The data sets are the input streams for the joint inversion estimate of present-day ice-mass change and GIA, focusing on Antarctica. However, the methods, code and data provided in this paper can be used to solve other problems, such as volume balances of the Antarctic ice sheet, or can be applied to other geographical regions in the case of the viscoelastic response functions. This paper presents the first of two contributions summarizing the work carried out within a European Space Agency funded study: Regional glacial isostatic adjustment and CryoSat elevation rate corrections in Antarctica (REGINA)

    Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018

    Get PDF
    The Greenland Ice Sheet has been a major contributor to global sea-level rise in recent decades1,2, and it is expected to continue to be so3. Although increases in glacier flow4-6 and surface melting7-9 have been driven by oceanic10-12 and atmospheric13,14 warming, the magnitude and trajectory of the ice sheet's mass imbalance remain uncertain. Here we compare and combine 26 individual satellite measurements of changes in the ice sheet's volume, flow and gravitational potential to produce a reconciled estimate of its mass balance. The ice sheet was close to a state of balance in the 1990s, but annual losses have risen since then, peaking at 345ย ยฑย 66ย billion tonnes per year in 2011. In all, Greenland lost 3,902ย ยฑย 342 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2018, causing the mean sea level to rise by 10.8ย ยฑย 0.9 millimetres. Using three regional climate models, we show that the reduced surface mass balance has driven 1,964ย ยฑย 565 billion tonnes (50.3 per cent) of the ice loss owing to increased meltwater runoff. The remaining 1,938ย ยฑย 541 billion tonnes (49.7 per cent) of ice loss was due to increased glacier dynamical imbalance, which rose from 46ย ยฑย 37 billion tonnes per year in the 1990s to 87ย ยฑย 25 billion tonnes per year since then. The total rate of ice loss slowed to 222ย ยฑย 30 billion tonnes per year between 2013 and 2017, on average, as atmospheric circulation favoured cooler conditions15 and ocean temperatures fell at the terminus of Jakobshavn Isbrรฆ16. Cumulative ice losses from Greenland as a whole have been close to the rates predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for their high-end climate warming scenario17, which forecast an additional 70 to 130 millimetres of global sea-level rise by 2100 compared with their central estimate

    Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018

    Get PDF
    In recent decades, the Greenland Ice Sheet has been a major contributor to global sea-level rise1,2, and it is expected to be so in the future3. Although increases in glacier flow4โ€“6 and surface melting7โ€“9 have been driven by oceanic10โ€“12 and atmospheric13,14 warming, the degree and trajectory of todayโ€™s imbalance remain uncertain. Here we compare and combine 26 individual satellite measurements of changes in the ice sheetโ€™s volume, flow and gravitational potential to produce a reconciled estimate of its mass balance. Although the ice sheet was close to a state of balance in the 1990s, annual losses have risen since then, peaking at 335 ยฑ 62 billion tonnes per year in 2011. In all, Greenland lost 3,800 ยฑ 339 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2018, causing the mean sea level to rise by 10.6 ยฑ 0.9 millimetres. Using three regional climate models, we show that reduced surface mass balance has driven 1,971 ยฑ 555 billion tonnes (52%) of the ice loss owing to increased meltwater runoff. The remaining 1,827 ยฑ 538 billion tonnes (48%) of ice loss was due to increased glacier discharge, which rose from 41 ยฑ 37 billion tonnes per year in the 1990s to 87 ยฑ 25 billion tonnes per year since then. Between 2013 and 2017, the total rate of ice loss slowed to 217 ยฑ 32 billion tonnes per year, on average, as atmospheric circulation favoured cooler conditions15 and as ocean temperatures fell at the terminus of Jakobshavn Isbrรฆ16. Cumulative ice losses from Greenland as a whole have been close to the IPCCโ€™s predicted rates for their high-end climate warming scenario17, which forecast an additional 50 to 120 millimetres of global sea-level rise by 2100 when compared to their central estimate

    An assessment of forward and inverse GIA solutions for Antarctica

    Get PDF
    In this work we assess the most recent estimates of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica, including those from both forward and inverse methods. The assessment is based on a comparison of the estimated uplift rates with a set of elastic-corrected GPS vertical velocities. These have been observed from an extensive GPS network and computed using data over the period 2009-2014. We ๏ฌnd systematic underestimations of the observed uplift rates in both inverse and forward methods over speci๏ฌc regions of Antarctica characterized by low mantle viscosities and thin lithosphere, such as the northern Antarctic Peninsula and the Amundsen Sea Embayment, where its recent ice discharge history is likely to be playing a role in current GIA. Uplift estimates for regions where many GIA models have traditionally placed their uplift maxima, such as the margins of Filchner-Ronne and Ross ice shelves, are found to be overestimated. GIA estimates show large variability over the interior of East Antarc tica which results in increased uncertainties on the ice-sheet mass balance derived from gravimetry methods

    ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ธ๊ณต์œ„์„ฑ ์„ผ์„œ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋‚จ๊ทน ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ดํ•ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ(์ง€๊ตฌ๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต), 2021.8. ์„œ๊ธฐ์›.์ง€๋‚œ ์ˆ˜ ์‹ญ ๋…„ ๊ฐ„, ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ง€์‹์€ ์ธ๊ณต์œ„์„ฑ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ ์ง€๊ตฌ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์œ„์„ฑ ๊ด€์ธก์€ ์ง„ํ–‰์ค‘์ธ ๋‚จ๊ทน ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์†์‹ค๊ณผ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜๋“ค์„ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์— ์ง„ํ–‰๋  ๋‚จ๊ทน ๋น™ํ•˜ ์†์‹ค์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ชจ๋‘๋Š” ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ์–ผ์Œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ์ด ํ–ฅํ›„์— ์ ์ฐจ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™” ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์œจ์ด ์ง€์†๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๋‚จ๊ทน์€ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์— ํ•ด์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์ƒ์Šน์„ ์œ ๋ฐœ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‚จ๊ทน์—์„œ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋  ๋น™ํ•˜์˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ง„ํ–‰์ค‘์ธ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์†์‹ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์˜ ์›์ธ ๊ธฐ์ž‘์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๊ฐ ๋น™ํ•˜๋งˆ๋‹ค ๋น„๊ท ์งˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋น™ํ•˜์˜ ๋™๋ ฅํ•™์€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์™€ ํ•ด์–‘ ์ˆœํ™˜, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ง€๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ง€๊ตฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์ด ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ๊ธฐ์ž‘์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ˆ์ธก์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ํ•ด์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋“ค์„ ์ด ๋ง๋ผํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹คํ•™์ œ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ๋ฆ„์˜ ์ผํ™˜์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ์›๊ฒฉ ํƒ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ฐ•์„ค๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ, ์ง€๊ตฌ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๋‚ด์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ถŒ๊ณผ ๋น™๊ถŒ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ˆ˜ ์‹ญ ๋…„ ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ๊ฐ•์„ค์€ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋…„ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๋‚จ๊ทน ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์†์‹ค์˜ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”์˜ ์•ฝ 30%๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์ž„์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ•์„ค๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋‚จ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ ๊ทน์ง„๋™ (Southern Annular Mode, SAM) ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ์šฐ๋Š” ๋‚จ๋ฐ˜๊ตฌ ๊ณ ์œ„๋„์˜ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์  ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์Œ๋„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‚จ๊ทน ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™” ๊ด€์ธก์˜ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋น™ํ•˜ ๋™๋ ฅํ•™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋น™ํ•˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž‘์€ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ œ์•ฝํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ธ๊ณต์œ„์„ฑ ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ณ„์™€ ๊ณ ๋„๊ณ„ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์„ ํ˜• ์—ญ์‚ฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ญ์‚ฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‚จ๊ทน ๋Œ€๋ฅ™ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™” (2003-2016) ๋ฅผ ์•ฝ 27km์˜ ๋†’์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ•œ ๋‹ฌ์˜ ์งง์€ ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋งŒ๋“  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์œ„์„ฑ ์ค‘๋ ฅ๊ณ„๋‚˜ ๊ณ ๋„๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์งˆ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ์ถ”์ธก๋œ๋‹ค. ์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ ๋‚จ๊ทน์˜ ๋น™ํ•˜ ๋ณ„ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ๊ฐ ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์— ๋น„ํ•ด, Input-Output ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‚จ๊ทน ๋น™ํ•˜ ํ•˜๋ถ€์˜ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ง€๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ํ›„๋น™๊ธฐ ๋ฐ˜๋™ (Glacial Isostatic Adjustment, GIA) ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธก์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ GIA ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ด€์ธก์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฝ๊ฐ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. GIAํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์•ž์„œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ์ถ”์‚ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„œ๋‚จ๊ทน ๋กœ์Šค ๋น™๋ถ• ๊ทผ์ฒ˜์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•œ ์บ  ๋น™๋ฅ˜ (Kamb Ice Stream) ํ•˜๋ถ€์˜ GIA ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฐ’์„ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ํ›„๋น™๊ธฐ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์ด ์บ  ๋น™๋ฅ˜์˜ ํ›„๋น™๊ธฐ ๋ฐ˜๋™์„ ๊ณผ๋Œ€์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ๋„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ˜„์กดํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ GIA ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์—์„œ ์บ  ๋น™๋ฅ˜ ํ•˜๋ถ€์˜ ํ›„๋น™๊ธฐ ๋ฐ˜๋™ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋‚จ๊ทน์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ์˜๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•  ๋•Œ, ์ด ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์žฌ๊ณ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ๋‚จ๊ทน ์–ผ์Œ ์งˆ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ด€์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ”๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋‹ค. ์„ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•œ ๋‚จ๊ทน ๋น™ํ•˜ ๋ฐฐ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ์ถ”์ •๊ณผ ๊ทธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ํ•ด์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์ƒ์Šน ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ์žฅ์— ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์™€ ๊ณ ์ฒด ์ง€๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•จ๊ณผ ๋™์‹œ์—, ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๋น™ํ•˜์˜ ํ•ด์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์ƒ์Šน ๊ธฐ์—ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์ด์ „์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋ณ„๋œ๋‹ค.Over the past few decades, understanding of ice mass changes in Antarctica has been greatly improved by advances in satellite observation and geophysical modeling techniques. Satellite observations have clearly shown evidence of ongoing Antarctic ice mass loss, and numerical models have quantitatively estimated future ice mass loss. Both observation and modeling have found that Antarctic ice mass loss is accelerating and this would continue in the future. Within this century, Antarctica is expected to be the most important contributor to sea-level rise. To accurately predict Antarctic ice mass loss, continuous Antarctic observation is required, and the cause of Antarctic ice mass loss should be understood. Ice mass variations over Antarctic glaciers are determined by many factors, and their magnitudes differ significantly from glaciers to glaciers. Understanding ice mass variations at individual glaciers are important to project future Antarctic ice mass losses and subsequent sea level rise. Because glacier mass balances are affected by different physical mechanisms associated with atmospheric and oceanic circulations and solid earth deformation, multidisciplinary studies have been required for the accurate understanding of the interaction between Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) and the entire Earth system. In this dissertation, three studies are carried out using multiple climate models and remote sensing data to understand the current status of glacier mass balance in AIS. The first study examines the role of precipitation in AIS ice mass changes, identifying the interaction between atmosphere and cryosphere. It is found that the precipitation accounts for most of the inter-annual ice mass variability in recent decades and about 30% of the acceleration in contemporary ice mass loss can be explained by precipitation decrease. EOF analysis suggests that such precipitation variability is closely related to periodic climate change in the high altitude of the Southern Hemisphere, named Southern Annular Mode (SAM). After removing effects associated with precipitation decrease, Antarctic ice mass loss associated with glacier dynamics can be obtained. The second study is to develop a new method to improve the spatial resolution of the Antarctic ice mass change by combining two different satellite observations. Antarctic ice mass change in higher resolution can be estimated by a new linear inversion technique using satellite altimetry and gravimetry observations together. The new method provides monthly ice mass changes (2003-2016) for all Antarctic glaciers with a spatial resolution of 27 km. The high-resolution ice mass data agree better with the ice mass change from the Input-Output method than data conventionally obtained either from gravimetry or altimetry satellite. The third study estimates the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) effect beneath the Antarctic glaciers. This aims to minimize the GIA error in ice mass observations. By comparing the high-resolution mass estimates with multiple climate models, the GIA effect beneath the Kamb Ice Stream (which is located near the Ross Ice Shelf in West Antarctica) is estimated. The estimated GIA effect is then compared with many GIA models. It is found that most of the GIA models overestimate the GIA effect at the Kamb Ice Stream. Given that a number of models simulate the highest GIA rate beneath the Kamb Ice Stream within Antarctic glaciers, this finding has significant implications to improve the accuracy of Antarctic ice mass change by reducing the GIA uncertainty. Lastly, we aggregate the results of the three studies to project the future mass loss of Antarctic glaciers. This result is distinct from previous studies in that it provides glacial-scale projections of ice mass changes based on ice dynamic effects after removing effects of precipitation and solid earth deformation from glacial-scale ice mass observations.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Backgrounds 5 2.1 Satellite gravimetry 5 2.1.1 Overview & Principle 5 2.1.2 Estimation of surface mass densities from GRACE gravity data 6 2.1.3 Spatial filtering 8 2.2 Satellite altimetry 11 2.2.1 Overview & Principle 11 2.2.2 Laser & radar altimetry 12 2.2.3 Data types 13 2.3 Least squares inversion 14 2.3.1 Simple least squares for linear inverse problem 14 2.3.2 Application of least square inversion to GRACE data 16 Chapter 3. Surface mass balance contributions to Antarctic ice mass change investigated by climate models and GRACE gravity data 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Data & Methods 20 3.2.1 Precipitation models 20 3.2.2 EOF analysis of SMB 21 3.2.3 REOF analysis of SMB 21 3.3 AIS SMB from 1979 to 2017 23 3.4 Observation of AIS SMB 29 3.5 Implications of SMB to present-day ice mass loss in AIS 34 3.6 Conclusion 35 Chapter 4. Estimation of high-resolution Antarctic ice mass balance using satellite gravimetry and altimetry 38 4.1 Introduction 38 4.2 Data 39 4.2.1 GRACE gravity data 39 4.2.2 Satellite altimetry data 40 4.3 Methods 43 4.3.1 Forward Modeling (FM) solution 43 4.3.2 Joint estimation using constrained linear deconvolution 46 4.3.3 Uncertainties 50 4.3.3.1 Uncertainty of GRACE observation 52 4.3.3.2 Uncertainty of FM solution 52 4.3.3.3 Uncertainty of altimetry-based mass loads 54 4.3.3.4 Uncertainty of CLD solution 57 4.4 High resolution Antarctic ice mass loads 59 4.5 AIS glacier mass balance 62 4.6 Conclusion 66 Chapter 5. Estimation of GIA effect beneath the Antarctic Glacier using multiple remote sensing and climate models 68 5.1 Introduction 68 5.2 Data & Method 69 5.2.1 Method 69 5.2.2 Basin boundary 71 5.2.3 SMB models 73 5.2.4 Mass densities from GRACE data 73 5.2.5 Mass densities from satellite altimetry data 74 5.2.6 High-resolution GRACE data and its sensitivity to GIA estimates 75 5.3 Result & Discussion 77 5.3.1 Estimated mass rates 77 5.3.2 GIA mass rate beneath the KIS 80 5.4 Conclusion 81 Chapter 6. Sea-level projections 82 Chapter 7. Conclusion 86 Appendix: Glacial mass variability calculated by satellite gravimetry, altimetry, and their joint estimation 89 References 112 Abstract in Korean 122๋ฐ•

    Constraining the mass balance of East Antarctica

    Get PDF
    We investigate the mass balance of East Antarctica for the period 2003-2013 using a Bayesian statistical framework. We combine satellite altimetry, gravimetry, and GPS with prior assumptions characterizing the underlying geophysical processes. We run three experiments based on two different assumptions to study possible solutions to the mass balance. We solve for trends in surface mass balance, ice dynamics, and glacial isostatic adjustment. The first assumption assigns low probability to ice dynamic mass loss in regions of slow flow, giving a mean dynamic trend of 17 ยฑ 10 Gt yr-1 and a total mass imbalance of 57 ยฑ 20 Gt yr-1. The second assumption considers a long-term dynamic thickening hypothesis and an a priori solution for surface mass balance from a regional climate model. The latter results in estimates 3 to 5 times larger for the ice dynamic trends but similar total mass imbalance. In both cases, gains in East Antarctica are smaller than losses in West Antarctica

    Acceleration of dynamic ice loss in Antarctica from satellite gravimetry

    Get PDF
    The dynamic stability of the Antarctic Ice Sheet is one of the largest uncertainties in projections of future global sea-level rise. Essential for improving projections of the ice sheet evolution is the understanding of the ongoing trends and accelerations of mass loss in the context of ice dynamics. Here, we examine accelerations of mass change of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 2002 to 2020 using data from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment; 2002โ€“2017) and its follow-on GRACE-FO (2018-present) satellite missions. By subtracting estimates of net snow accumulation provided by re-analysis data and regional climate models from GRACE/GRACE-FO mass changes, we isolate variations in ice-dynamic discharge and compare them to direct measurements based on the remote sensing of the surface-ice velocity (2002โ€“2017). We show that variations in the GRACE/GRACE-FO time series are modulated by variations in regional snow accumulation caused by large-scale atmospheric circulation. We show for the first time that, after removal of these surface effects, accelerations of ice-dynamic discharge from GRACE/GRACE-FO agree well with those independently derived from surface-ice velocities. For 2002โ€“2020, we recover a discharge acceleration of -5.3 ยฑ 2.2 Gt yrโˆ’2 for the entire ice sheet; these increasing losses originate mainly in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen Sea Embayment regions (68%), with additional significant contributions from Dronning Maud Land (18%) and the Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf region (13%). Under the assumption that the recovered rates and accelerations of mass loss persisted independent of any external forcing, Antarctica would contribute 7.6 ยฑ 2.9 cm to global mean sea-level rise by the year 2100, more than two times the amount of 2.9 ยฑ 0.6 cm obtained by linear extrapolation of current GRACE/GRACE-FO mass loss trends
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore