199 research outputs found
Fuzzy Description Logics with General Concept Inclusions
Description logics (DLs) are used to represent knowledge of an application domain and provide standard reasoning services to infer consequences of this knowledge. However, classical DLs are not suited to represent vagueness in the description of the knowledge. We consider a combination of DLs and Fuzzy Logics to address this task. In particular, we consider the t-norm-based semantics for fuzzy DLs introduced by Hájek in 2005. Since then, many tableau algorithms have been developed for reasoning in fuzzy DLs. Another popular approach is to reduce fuzzy ontologies to classical ones and use existing highly optimized classical reasoners to deal with them. However, a systematic study of the computational complexity of the different reasoning problems is so far missing from the literature on fuzzy DLs. Recently, some of the developed tableau algorithms have been shown to be incorrect in the presence of general concept inclusion axioms (GCIs). In some fuzzy DLs, reasoning with GCIs has even turned out to be undecidable. This work provides a rigorous analysis of the boundary between decidable and undecidable reasoning problems in t-norm-based fuzzy DLs, in particular for GCIs. Existing undecidability proofs are extended to cover large classes of fuzzy DLs, and decidability is shown for most of the remaining logics considered here. Additionally, the computational complexity of reasoning in fuzzy DLs with semantics based on finite lattices is analyzed. For most decidability results, tight complexity bounds can be derived
Robust Linear Temporal Logic
Although it is widely accepted that every system should be robust, in the
sense that "small" violations of environment assumptions should lead to "small"
violations of system guarantees, it is less clear how to make this intuitive
notion of robustness mathematically precise. In this paper, we address this
problem by developing a robust version of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), which we
call robust LTL and denote by rLTL. Formulas in rLTL are syntactically
identical to LTL formulas but are endowed with a many-valued semantics that
encodes robustness. In particular, the semantics of the rLTL formula is such that a "small" violation of the environment
assumption is guaranteed to only produce a "small" violation of the
system guarantee . In addition to introducing rLTL, we study the
verification and synthesis problems for this logic: similarly to LTL, we show
that both problems are decidable, that the verification problem can be solved
in time exponential in the number of subformulas of the rLTL formula at hand,
and that the synthesis problem can be solved in doubly exponential time
Being correct is not enough: efficient verification using robust linear temporal logic
While most approaches in formal methods address system correctness, ensuring
robustness has remained a challenge. In this paper we present and study the
logic rLTL which provides a means to formally reason about both correctness and
robustness in system design. Furthermore, we identify a large fragment of rLTL
for which the verification problem can be efficiently solved, i.e.,
verification can be done by using an automaton, recognizing the behaviors
described by the rLTL formula , of size at most , where is the length of . This
result improves upon the previously known bound of
for rLTL verification and is closer to
the LTL bound of . The usefulness of
this fragment is demonstrated by a number of case studies showing its practical
significance in terms of expressiveness, the ability to describe robustness,
and the fine-grained information that rLTL brings to the process of system
verification. Moreover, these advantages come at a low computational overhead
with respect to LTL verification.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1510.08970. v2 notes: Proof
on the complexity of translating rLTL formulae to LTL formulae via the
rewriting approach. New case study on the scalability of rLTL formulae in the
proposed fragment. Accepted to appear in ACM Transactions on Computational
Logi
Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures
This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, FOSSACS 2021, which was held during March 27 until April 1, 2021, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2021. The conference was planned to take place in Luxembourg and changed to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 28 regular papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 88 submissions. They deal with research on theories and methods to support the analysis, integration, synthesis, transformation, and verification of programs and software systems
A method for rigorous design of reconfigurable systems
Reconfigurability, understood as the ability of a system to behave differently in different modes of operation and commute between them along its lifetime, is a cross-cutting concern in modern Software Engineering. This paper introduces a specification method for reconfigurable software based on a global transition structure to capture the system's reconfiguration space, and a local specification of each operation mode in whatever logic (equational, first-order, partial, fuzzy, probabilistic, etc.) is found expressive enough for handling its requirements.
In the method these two levels are not only made explicit and juxtaposed, but formally interrelated. The key to achieve such a goal is a systematic process of hybridisation of logics through which the relationship between the local and global levels of a specification becomes internalised in the logic itself.This work is financed by the ERDF – European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation – COMPETE 2020 Programme and by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within projects POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016692 and UID/MAT/04106/2013. The first author is further supported by the BPD FCT Grant SFRH/BPD/103004/2014, and R. Neves is sponsored by FCT Grant SFRH/BD/52234/2013. M.A. Martins is also funded by the EU FP7 Marie Curie PIRSESGA-2012-318986 project GeTFun: Generalizing Truth-Functionality
- …