3,277 research outputs found
Obfuscation-based malware update: A comparison of manual and automated methods
Indexación: Scopus; Web of Science.This research presents a proposal of malware classification and its update based on capacity and obfuscation. This article is an extension of [4]a, and describes the procedure for malware updating, that is, to take obsolete malware that is already detectable by antiviruses, update it through obfuscation techniques and thus making it undetectable again. As the updating of malware is generally performed manually, an automatic solution is presented together with a comparison from the standpoint of cost and processing time. The automated method proved to be more reliable, fast and less intensive in the use of resources, specially in terms of antivirus analysis and malware functionality checking times.http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/ijccc/article/view/2961/112
Learning Fast and Slow: PROPEDEUTICA for Real-time Malware Detection
In this paper, we introduce and evaluate PROPEDEUTICA, a novel methodology
and framework for efficient and effective real-time malware detection,
leveraging the best of conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning
(DL) algorithms. In PROPEDEUTICA, all software processes in the system start
execution subjected to a conventional ML detector for fast classification. If a
piece of software receives a borderline classification, it is subjected to
further analysis via more performance expensive and more accurate DL methods,
via our newly proposed DL algorithm DEEPMALWARE. Further, we introduce delays
to the execution of software subjected to deep learning analysis as a way to
"buy time" for DL analysis and to rate-limit the impact of possible malware in
the system. We evaluated PROPEDEUTICA with a set of 9,115 malware samples and
877 commonly used benign software samples from various categories for the
Windows OS. Our results show that the false positive rate for conventional ML
methods can reach 20%, and for modern DL methods it is usually below 6%.
However, the classification time for DL can be 100X longer than conventional ML
methods. PROPEDEUTICA improved the detection F1-score from 77.54% (conventional
ML method) to 90.25%, and reduced the detection time by 54.86%. Further, the
percentage of software subjected to DL analysis was approximately 40% on
average. Further, the application of delays in software subjected to ML reduced
the detection time by approximately 10%. Finally, we found and discussed a
discrepancy between the detection accuracy offline (analysis after all traces
are collected) and on-the-fly (analysis in tandem with trace collection). Our
insights show that conventional ML and modern DL-based malware detectors in
isolation cannot meet the needs of efficient and effective malware detection:
high accuracy, low false positive rate, and short classification time.Comment: 17 pages, 7 figure
Automatically combining static malware detection techniques
Malware detection techniques come in many different flavors, and cover different effectiveness and efficiency trade-offs. This paper evaluates a number of machine learning techniques to combine multiple static Android malware detection techniques using automatically constructed decision trees. We identify the best methods to construct the trees. We demonstrate that those trees classify sample apps better and faster than individual techniques alone
- …