Type prediction in RDF knowledge bases using hierarchical multilabel classification

Large Semantic Web knowledge bases are often noisy, incorrect, and incomplete with respect to type information. Automatic type prediction can help reduce such incompleteness, and, as previous works show, statistical methods are well-suited for this kind of data. Since most Semantic Web knowledge bases come with an ontology defining a type hierarchy, in this paper, we rephrase the type prediction problem as a hierarchical multilabel classification problem. We propose SLCN, a modification of the local classifier per node approach, which performs feature selection, instance sampling, and class balancing for each local classifier. Our approach improves scalability, facilitating its application on large Semantic Web datasets with high-dimensional feature and label spaces. We compare the performance of our proposed method with a state-of-the-art type prediction approach and popular hierarchical multilabel classifiers, and report on experiments with large-scale RDF datasets

Multi-Target Prediction: A Unifying View on Problems and Methods

Multi-target prediction (MTP) is concerned with the simultaneous prediction of multiple target variables of diverse type. Due to its enormous application potential, it has developed into an active and rapidly expanding research field that combines several subfields of machine learning, including multivariate regression, multi-label classification, multi-task learning, dyadic prediction, zero-shot learning, network inference, and matrix completion. In this paper, we present a unifying view on MTP problems and methods. First, we formally discuss commonalities and differences between existing MTP problems. To this end, we introduce a general framework that covers the above subfields as special cases. As a second contribution, we provide a structured overview of MTP methods. This is accomplished by identifying a number of key properties, which distinguish such methods and determine their suitability for different types of problems. Finally, we also discuss a few challenges for future research