10,427 research outputs found
Improved Algorithms for Parity and Streett objectives
The computation of the winning set for parity objectives and for Streett
objectives in graphs as well as in game graphs are central problems in
computer-aided verification, with application to the verification of closed
systems with strong fairness conditions, the verification of open systems,
checking interface compatibility, well-formedness of specifications, and the
synthesis of reactive systems. We show how to compute the winning set on
vertices for (1) parity-3 (aka one-pair Streett) objectives in game graphs in
time and for (2) k-pair Streett objectives in graphs in time
. For both problems this gives faster algorithms for dense
graphs and represents the first improvement in asymptotic running time in 15
years
Solving Parity Games in Scala
Parity games are two-player games, played on directed graphs, whose nodes are labeled with priorities. Along a play, the maximal priority occurring infinitely often determines the winner. In the last two decades, a variety of algorithms and successive optimizations have been proposed. The majority of them have been implemented in PGSolver, written in OCaml, which has been elected by the community as the de facto platform to solve efficiently parity games as well as evaluate their performance in several specific cases.
PGSolver includes the Zielonka Recursive Algorithm that has been shown to perform better than the others in randomly generated games. However, even for arenas with a few thousand of nodes (especially over dense graphs), it requires minutes to solve the corresponding game.
In this paper, we deeply revisit the implementation of the recursive algorithm introducing several improvements and making use of Scala Programming Language. These choices have been proved to be very successful, gaining up to two orders of magnitude in running time
Parity and Streett Games with Costs
We consider two-player games played on finite graphs equipped with costs on
edges and introduce two winning conditions, cost-parity and cost-Streett, which
require bounds on the cost between requests and their responses. Both
conditions generalize the corresponding classical omega-regular conditions and
the corresponding finitary conditions. For parity games with costs we show that
the first player has positional winning strategies and that determining the
winner lies in NP and coNP. For Streett games with costs we show that the first
player has finite-state winning strategies and that determining the winner is
EXPTIME-complete. The second player might need infinite memory in both games.
Both types of games with costs can be solved by solving linearly many instances
of their classical variants.Comment: A preliminary version of this work appeared in FSTTCS 2012 under the
name "Cost-parity and Cost-Streett Games". The research leading to these
results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreements 259454 (GALE) and 239850
(SOSNA
Infinite games with finite knowledge gaps
Infinite games where several players seek to coordinate under imperfect
information are deemed to be undecidable, unless the information is
hierarchically ordered among the players.
We identify a class of games for which joint winning strategies can be
constructed effectively without restricting the direction of information flow.
Instead, our condition requires that the players attain common knowledge about
the actual state of the game over and over again along every play.
We show that it is decidable whether a given game satisfies the condition,
and prove tight complexity bounds for the strategy synthesis problem under
-regular winning conditions given by parity automata.Comment: 39 pages; 2nd revision; submitted to Information and Computatio
Infinite-Duration Bidding Games
Two-player games on graphs are widely studied in formal methods as they model
the interaction between a system and its environment. The game is played by
moving a token throughout a graph to produce an infinite path. There are
several common modes to determine how the players move the token through the
graph; e.g., in turn-based games the players alternate turns in moving the
token. We study the {\em bidding} mode of moving the token, which, to the best
of our knowledge, has never been studied in infinite-duration games. The
following bidding rule was previously defined and called Richman bidding. Both
players have separate {\em budgets}, which sum up to . In each turn, a
bidding takes place: Both players submit bids simultaneously, where a bid is
legal if it does not exceed the available budget, and the higher bidder pays
his bid to the other player and moves the token. The central question studied
in bidding games is a necessary and sufficient initial budget for winning the
game: a {\em threshold} budget in a vertex is a value such that
if Player 's budget exceeds , he can win the game, and if Player 's
budget exceeds , he can win the game. Threshold budgets were previously
shown to exist in every vertex of a reachability game, which have an
interesting connection with {\em random-turn} games -- a sub-class of simple
stochastic games in which the player who moves is chosen randomly. We show the
existence of threshold budgets for a qualitative class of infinite-duration
games, namely parity games, and a quantitative class, namely mean-payoff games.
The key component of the proof is a quantitative solution to strongly-connected
mean-payoff bidding games in which we extend the connection with random-turn
games to these games, and construct explicit optimal strategies for both
players.Comment: A short version appeared in CONCUR 2017. The paper is accepted to
JAC
Deciding the value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight automata
The value 1 problem is a decision problem for probabilistic automata over
finite words: given a probabilistic automaton, are there words accepted with
probability arbitrarily close to 1? This problem was proved undecidable
recently; to overcome this, several classes of probabilistic automata of
different nature were proposed, for which the value 1 problem has been shown
decidable. In this paper, we introduce yet another class of probabilistic
automata, called leaktight automata, which strictly subsumes all classes of
probabilistic automata whose value 1 problem is known to be decidable. We prove
that for leaktight automata, the value 1 problem is decidable (in fact,
PSPACE-complete) by constructing a saturation algorithm based on the
computation of a monoid abstracting the behaviours of the automaton. We rely on
algebraic techniques developed by Simon to prove that this abstraction is
complete. Furthermore, we adapt this saturation algorithm to decide whether an
automaton is leaktight. Finally, we show a reduction allowing to extend our
decidability results from finite words to infinite ones, implying that the
value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight parity automata is decidable
On the Complexity of ATL and ATL* Module Checking
Module checking has been introduced in late 1990s to verify open systems,
i.e., systems whose behavior depends on the continuous interaction with the
environment. Classically, module checking has been investigated with respect to
specifications given as CTL and CTL* formulas. Recently, it has been shown that
CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking offers a distinctly different perspective
from the better-known problem of ATL (resp., ATL*) model checking. In
particular, ATL (resp., ATL*) module checking strictly enhances the
expressiveness of both CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking and ATL (resp. ATL*)
model checking. In this paper, we provide asymptotically optimal bounds on the
computational cost of module checking against ATL and ATL*, whose upper bounds
are based on an automata-theoretic approach. We show that module-checking for
ATL is EXPTIME-complete, which is the same complexity of module checking
against CTL. On the other hand, ATL* module checking turns out to be
3EXPTIME-complete, hence exponentially harder than CTL* module checking.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2017, arXiv:1709.0176
The Bridge Between Regular Cost Functions and Omega-Regular Languages
In this paper, we exhibit a one-to-one correspondence between omega-regular languages and a subclass of regular cost functions over finite words, called omega-regular like cost functions. This bridge between the two models allows one to readily import classical results such as the last appearance record or the McNaughton-Safra constructions to the realm of regular cost functions. In combination with game theoretic techniques, this also yields a simple description of an optimal procedure of history-determinisation for cost automata, a central result in the theory of regular cost functions
- …