Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package

Nonlinear time series analysis is becoming a more and more reliable tool for the study of complicated dynamics from measurements. The concept of low-dimensional chaos has proven to be fruitful in the understanding of many complex phenomena despite the fact that very few natural systems have actually been found to be low dimensional deterministic in the sense of the theory. In order to evaluate the long term usefulness of the nonlinear time series approach as inspired by chaos theory, it will be important that the corresponding methods become more widely accessible. This paper, while not a proper review on nonlinear time series analysis, tries to make a contribution to this process by describing the actual implementation of the algorithms, and their proper usage. Most of the methods require the choice of certain parameters for each specific time series application. We will try to give guidance in this respect. The scope and selection of topics in this article, as well as the implementational choices that have been made, correspond to the contents of the software package TISEAN which is publicly available from http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~tisean . In fact, this paper can be seen as an extended manual for the TISEAN programs. It fills the gap between the technical documentation and the existing literature, providing the necessary entry points for a more thorough study of the theoretical background.Comment: 27 pages, 21 figures, downloadable software at http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~tisea

Bifurcation of Nonlinear Bloch Waves from the Spectrum in the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation

We rigorously analyze the bifurcation of stationary so called nonlinear Bloch waves (NLBs) from the spectrum in the Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation with a periodic potential, in arbitrary space dimensions. These are solutions which can be expressed as finite sums of quasi-periodic functions, and which in a formal asymptotic expansion are obtained from solutions of the so called algebraic coupled mode equations. Here we justify this expansion by proving the existence of NLBs and estimating the error of the formal asymptotics. The analysis is illustrated by numerical bifurcation diagrams, mostly in 2D. In addition, we illustrate some relations of NLBs to other classes of solutions of the GP equation, in particular to so called out--of--gap solitons and truncated NLBs, and present some numerical experiments concerning the stability of these solutions.Comment: 32 pages, 12 figures, changes: discussion of assumptions reorganized, a new section on stability of the studied solutions, 15 new references adde

모델기반강화학습을이용한공정제어및최적화

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :공과대학 화학생물공학부,2020. 2. 이종민.순차적 의사결정 문제는 공정 최적화의 핵심 분야 중 하나이다. 이 문제의 수치적 해법 중 가장 많이 사용되는 것은 순방향으로 작동하는 직접법 (direct optimization) 방법이지만, 몇가지 한계점을 지니고 있다. 최적해는 open-loop의 형태를 지니고 있으며, 불확정성이 존재할때 방법론의 수치적 복잡도가 증가한다는 것이다. 동적 계획법 (dynamic programming) 은 이러한 한계점을 근원적으로 해결할 수 있지만, 그동안 공정 최적화에 적극적으로 고려되지 않았던 이유는 동적 계획법의 결과로 얻어진 편미분 방정식 문제가 유한차원 벡터공간이 아닌 무한차원의 함수공간에서 다루어지기 때문이다. 소위 차원의 저주라고 불리는 이 문제를 해결하기 위한 한가지 방법으로서, 샘플을 이용한 근사적 해법에 초점을 둔 강화학습 방법론이 연구되어 왔다. 본 학위논문에서는 강화학습 방법론 중, 공정 최적화에 적합한 모델 기반 강화학습에 대해 연구하고, 이를 공정 최적화의 대표적인 세가지 순차적 의사결정 문제인 스케줄링, 상위단계 최적화, 하위단계 제어에 적용하는 것을 목표로 한다. 이 문제들은 각각 부분관측 마르코프 결정 과정 (partially observable Markov decision process), 제어-아핀 상태공간 모델 (control-affine state space model), 일반적 상태공간 모델 (general state space model)로 모델링된다. 또한 각 수치적 모델들을 해결하기 위해 point based value iteration (PBVI), globalized dual heuristic programming (GDHP), and differential dynamic programming (DDP)로 불리는 방법들을 도입하였다. 이 세가지 문제와 방법론에서 제시된 특징들을 다음과 같이 요약할 수 있다: 첫번째로, 스케줄링 문제에서 closed-loop 피드백 형태의 해를 제시할 수 있었다. 이는 기존 직접법에서 얻을 수 없었던 형태로서, 강화학습의 강점을 부각할 수 있는 측면이라 생각할 수 있다. 두번째로 고려한 하위단계 제어 문제에서, 동적 계획법의 무한차원 함수공간 최적화 문제를 함수 근사 방법을 통해 유한차원 벡터공간 최적화 문제로 완화할 수 있는 방법을 도입하였다. 특히, 심층 신경망을 이용하여 함수 근사를 하였고, 이때 발생하는 여러가지 장점과 수렴 해석 결과를 본 학위논문에 실었다. 마지막 문제는 상위 단계 동적 최적화 문제이다. 동적 최적화 문제에서 발생하는 제약 조건하에서 강화학습을 수행하기 위해, 원-쌍대 미분동적 계획법 (primal-dual DDP) 방법론을 새로 제안하였다. 앞서 설명한 세가지 문제에 적용된 방법론을 검증하고, 동적 계획법이 직접법에 비견될 수 있는 방법론이라는 주장을 실증하기 위해 여러가지 공정 예제를 실었다.Sequential decision making problem is a crucial technology for plant-wide process optimization. While the dominant numerical method is the forward-in-time direct optimization, it is limited to the open-loop solution and has difficulty in considering the uncertainty. Dynamic programming method complements the limitations, nonetheless associated functional optimization suffers from the curse-of-dimensionality. The sample-based approach for approximating the dynamic programming, referred to as reinforcement learning (RL) can resolve the issue and investigated throughout this thesis. The method that accounts for the system model explicitly is in particular interest. The model-based RL is exploited to solve the three representative sequential decision making problems; scheduling, supervisory optimization, and regulatory control. The problems are formulated with partially observable Markov decision process, control-affine state space model, and general state space model, and associated model-based RL algorithms are point based value iteration (PBVI), globalized dual heuristic programming (GDHP), and differential dynamic programming (DDP), respectively. The contribution for each problem can be written as follows: First, for the scheduling problem, we developed the closed-loop feedback scheme which highlights the strength compared to the direct optimization method. In the second case, the regulatory control problem is tackled by the function approximation method which relaxes the functional optimization to the finite dimensional vector space optimization. Deep neural networks (DNNs) is utilized as the approximator, and the advantages as well as the convergence analysis is performed in the thesis. Finally, for the supervisory optimization problem, we developed the novel constraint RL framework that uses the primal-dual DDP method. Various illustrative examples are demonstrated to validate the developed model-based RL algorithms and to support the thesis statement on which the dynamic programming method can be considered as a complementary method for direct optimization method.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and previous work 1 1.2 Statement of contributions 9 1.3 Outline of the thesis 11 2. Background and preliminaries 13 2.1 Optimization problem formulation and the principle of optimality 13 2.1.1 Markov decision process 15 2.1.2 State space model 19 2.2 Overview of the developed RL algorithms 28 2.2.1 Point based value iteration 28 2.2.2 Globalized dual heuristic programming 29 2.2.3 Differential dynamic programming 32 3. A POMDP framework for integrated scheduling of infrastructure maintenance and inspection 35 3.1 Introduction 35 3.2 POMDP solution algorithm 38 3.2.1 General point based value iteration 38 3.2.2 GapMin algorithm 46 3.2.3 Receding horizon POMDP 49 3.3 Problem formulation for infrastructure scheduling 54 3.3.1 State 56 3.3.2 Maintenance and inspection actions 57 3.3.3 State transition function 61 3.3.4 Cost function 67 3.3.5 Observation set and observation function 68 3.3.6 State augmentation 69 3.4 Illustrative example and simulation result 69 3.4.1 Structural point for the analysis of a high dimensional belief space 72 3.4.2 Infinite horizon policy under the natural deterioration process 72 3.4.3 Receding horizon POMDP 79 3.4.4 Validation of POMDP policy via Monte Carlo simulation 83 4. A model-based deep reinforcement learning method applied to finite-horizon optimal control of nonlinear control-affine system 88 4.1 Introduction 88 4.2 Function approximation and learning with deep neural networks 91 4.2.1 GDHP with a function approximator 91 4.2.2 Stable learning of DNNs 96 4.2.3 Overall algorithm 103 4.3 Results and discussions 107 4.3.1 Example 1: Semi-batch reactor 107 4.3.2 Example 2: Diffusion-Convection-Reaction (DCR) process 120 5. Convergence analysis of the model-based deep reinforcement learning for optimal control of nonlinear control-affine system 126 5.1 Introduction 126 5.2 Convergence proof of globalized dual heuristic programming (GDHP) 128 5.3 Function approximation with deep neural networks 137 5.3.1 Function approximation and gradient descent learning 137 5.3.2 Forward and backward propagations of DNNs 139 5.4 Convergence analysis in the deep neural networks space 141 5.4.1 Lyapunov analysis of the neural network parameter errors 141 5.4.2 Lyapunov analysis of the closed-loop stability 150 5.4.3 Overall Lyapunov function 152 5.5 Simulation results and discussions 157 5.5.1 System description 158 5.5.2 Algorithmic settings 160 5.5.3 Control result 161 6. Primal-dual differential dynamic programming for constrained dynamic optimization of continuous system 170 6.1 Introduction 170 6.2 Primal-dual differential dynamic programming for constrained dynamic optimization 172 6.2.1 Augmented Lagrangian method 172 6.2.2 Primal-dual differential dynamic programming algorithm 175 6.2.3 Overall algorithm 179 6.3 Results and discussions 179 7. Concluding remarks 186 7.1 Summary of the contributions 187 7.2 Future works 189 Bibliography 192Docto

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

This open access two-volume set constitutes the proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS 2021, which was held during March 27 – April 1, 2021, as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2021. The conference was planned to take place in Luxembourg and changed to an online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The total of 41 full papers presented in the proceedings was carefully reviewed and selected from 141 submissions. The volume also contains 7 tool papers; 6 Tool Demo papers, 9 SV-Comp Competition Papers. The papers are organized in topical sections as follows: Part I: Game Theory; SMT Verification; Probabilities; Timed Systems; Neural Networks; Analysis of Network Communication. Part II: Verification Techniques (not SMT); Case Studies; Proof Generation/Validation; Tool Papers; Tool Demo Papers; SV-Comp Tool Competition Papers