24,642 research outputs found

    Option-pricing in incomplete markets: the hedging portfolio plus a risk premium-based recursive approach

    Get PDF
    Consider a non-spanned security CTC_{T} in an incomplete market. We study the risk/return tradeoffs generated if this security is sold for an arbitrage-free price C0^\hat{C_{0}} and then hedged. We consider recursive "one-period optimal" self-financing hedging strategies, a simple but tractable criterion. For continuous trading, diffusion processes, the one-period minimum variance portfolio is optimal. Let C0(0)C_{0}(0) be its price. Self-financing implies that the residual risk is equal to the sum of the one-period orthogonal hedging errors, tTYt(0)er(Tt)\sum_{t\leq T} Y_{t}(0) e^{r(T -t)}. To compensate the residual risk, a risk premium ytΔty_{t}\Delta t is associated with every YtY_{t}. Now let C0(y)C_{0}(y) be the price of the hedging portfolio, and tT(Yt(y)+ytΔt)er(Tt)\sum_{t\leq T}(Y_{t}(y)+y_{t}\Delta t)e^{r(T-t)} is the total residual risk. Although not the same, the one-period hedging errors Yt(0)andYt(y)Y_{t}(0) and Y_{t}(y) are orthogonal to the trading assets, and are perfectly correlated. This implies that the spanned option payoff does not depend on y. Let C0^C0(y)\hat{C_{0}}-C_{0}(y). A main result follows. Any arbitrage-free price, C0^\hat{C_{0}}, is just the price of a hedging portfolio (such as in a complete market), C0(0)C_{0}(0), plus a premium, C0^C0(0)\hat{C_{0}}-C_{0}(0). That is, C0(0)C_{0}(0) is the price of the option's payoff which can be spanned, and C0^C0(0)\hat{C_{0}}-C_{0}(0) is the premium associated with the option's payoff which cannot be spanned (and yields a contingent risk premium of sum ytΔy_{t}\Deltater(Tt) e^{r(T-t)} at maturity). We study other applications of option-pricing theory as well

    Superhedging in illiquid markets

    Full text link
    We study contingent claims in a discrete-time market model where trading costs are given by convex functions and portfolios are constrained by convex sets. In addition to classical frictionless markets and markets with transaction costs or bid-ask spreads, our framework covers markets with nonlinear illiquidity effects for large instantaneous trades. We derive dual characterizations of superhedging conditions for contingent claim processes in a market without a cash account. The characterizations are given in terms of stochastic discount factors that correspond to martingale densities in a market with a cash account. The dual representations are valid under a topological condition and a weak consistency condition reminiscent of the ``law of one price'', both of which are implied by the no arbitrage condition in the case of classical perfectly liquid market models. We give alternative sufficient conditions that apply to market models with nonlinear cost functions and portfolio constraints

    Indifference Pricing and Hedging in a Multiple-Priors Model with Trading Constraints

    Get PDF
    This paper considers utility indifference valuation of derivatives under model uncertainty and trading constraints, where the utility is formulated as an additive stochastic differential utility of both intertemporal consumption and terminal wealth, and the uncertain prospects are ranked according to a multiple-priors model of Chen and Epstein (2002). The price is determined by two optimal stochastic control problems (mixed with optimal stopping time in the case of American option) of forward-backward stochastic differential equations. By means of backward stochastic differential equation and partial differential equation methods, we show that both bid and ask prices are closely related to the Black-Scholes risk-neutral price with modified dividend rates. The two prices will actually coincide with each other if there is no trading constraint or the model uncertainty disappears. Finally, two applications to European option and American option are discussed.Comment: 28 pages in Science China Mathematics, 201

    A non-arbitrage liquidity model with observable parameters for derivatives

    Get PDF
    We develop a parameterised model for liquidity effects arising from the trading in an asset. Liquidity is defined via a combination of a trader's individual transaction cost and a price slippage impact, which is felt by all market participants. The chosen definition allows liquidity to be observable in a centralised order-book of an asset as is usually provided in most non-specialist exchanges. The discrete-time version of the model is based on the CRR binomial tree and in the appropriate continuous-time limits we derive various nonlinear partial differential equations. Both versions can be directly applied to the pricing and hedging of options; the nonlinear nature of liquidity leads to natural bid-ask spreads that are based on the liquidity of the market for the underlying and the existence of (super-)replication strategies. We test and calibrate our model set-up empirically with high-frequency data of German blue chips and discuss further extensions to the model, including stochastic liquidity
    corecore