Looking with the head and eyes: a developmental study

From a very early age, infants use their heads, eyes and hands to explore the world of objects around them. The infant therefore has to develop a hierarchy of stabilized systems: trunk, head and eyes must work in coordination to allow effective control of the arms and hands. In particular gaze has to be stable. Previous research into the stabilization of gaze has mainly concentrated on how eye movements compensate for head movements. There is little information on the role of the head in gaze stabilization, either for adults or for infants. The head and eye coordination of a group of adults was tested under two situations; when tracking a moving target and when compensating for body movement while gaze was fixed on a stationary target. Movement of the target or subject could be either predictable or unpredictable. It was found that the head played an important role, whether the target or subject was moving. Head control was equally good under both conditions, but was superior when movement was predictable. A group of infant subjects were tested longitudinally on the same tasks in order to chart the development of the role of the head in looking. Testing was at three week intervals between the ages of 10 and 28 weeks. As with the adults, the head was found to play an important role, control improved over the tested period, showing a surge around 16-20 weeks. Unlike adults, the performance of the infants was much better when they rather than the target were moving. Deficiencies in the development of gaze stabilization would have serious implications for perceptuo-motor development. A brain-damaged infant was tested under similar conditions in an exploratory longitudinal study between the ages of 21-28 weeks. He was shown to be principally deficient in head rather than eye control, particularly in the visual tracking task

Development of functional ectopic compound eyes in scarabaeid beetles by knockdown of orthodenticle

Complex traits like limbs, brains, or eyes form through coordinated integration of diverse cell fates across developmental space and time, yet understanding how complexity and integration emerge from uniform, undifferentiated precursor tissues remains limited. Here, we use ectopic eye formation as a paradigm to investigate the emergence and integration of novel complex structures following massive ontogenetic perturbation. We show that down-regulation via RNAi of a single head patterning gene—orthodenticle—induces ectopic structures externally resembling compound eyes at the middorsal adult head of both basal and derived scarabaeid beetle species (Onthophagini and Oniticellini). Scanning electron microscopy documents ommatidial organization of these induced structures, while immunohistochemistry reveals the presence of rudimentary ommatidial lenses, crystalline cones, and associated neural-like tissue within them. Further, RNA-sequencing experiments show that after orthodenticle down-regulation, the transcriptional signature of the middorsal head—the location of ectopic eye induction—converges onto that of regular compound eyes, including up-regulation of several retina-specific genes. Finally, a light-aversion behavioral assay to assess functionality reveals that ectopic compound eyes can rescue the ability to respond to visual stimuli when wild-type eyes are surgically removed. Combined, our results show that knockdown of a single gene is sufficient for the middorsal head to acquire the competence to ectopically generate a functional compound eye-like structure. These findings highlight the buffering capacity of developmental systems, allowing massive genetic perturbations to be channeled toward orderly and functional developmental outcomes, and render ectopic eye formation a widely accessible paradigm to study the evolution of complex systems.Fil: Zattara, Eduardo Enrique. Indiana University; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Macagno, Anna L. M.. Indiana University; Estados UnidosFil: Busey, Hannah A.. Indiana University; Estados UnidosFil: Moczek, Armin P.. Indiana University; Estados Unido

Dummy eye measurements of microsaccades: testing the influence of system noise and head movements on microsaccade detection in a popular video-based eye tracker

Whereas early studies of microsaccades have predominantly relied on custom-built eye trackers and manual tagging of microsaccades, more recent work tends to use video-based eye tracking and automated algorithms for microsaccade detection. While data from these newer studies suggest that microsaccades can be reliably detected with video-based systems, this has not been systematically evaluated. I here present a method and data examining microsaccade detection in an often used video-based system (the Eyelink II system) and a commonly used detection algorithm (Engbert & Kliegl, 2003; Engbert & Mergenthaler, 2006). Recordings from human participants and those obtained using a pair of dummy eyes, mounted on a pair of glasses either worn by a human participant (i.e., with head motion) or a dummy head (no head motion) were compared. Three experiments were conducted. The first experiment suggests that when microsaccade measurements make use of the pupil detection mode, microsaccade detections in the absence of eye movements are sparse in the absence of head movements, but frequent with head movements (despite the use of a chin rest). A second experiment demonstrates that by using measurements that rely on a combination of corneal reflection and pupil detection, false microsaccade detections can be largely avoided as long as a binocular criterion is used. A third experiment examines whether past results may have been affected by possible incorrect detections due to small head movements. It shows that despite the many detections due to head movements, the typical modulation of microsaccade rate after stimulus onset is found only when recording from the participants’ eyes

Genetic Dissection of the Drosophila Nervous System by means of Mosaics

Given a mutant having abnormal behavior, the anatomical domain responsible for the deficit may be identified by the use of genetic mosaicism. Individuals may be produced in which a portion of the body is mutant male while the rest is normal female. In such sex mosaics, or gynandromorphs, the division line between normal and mutant parts can occur in various orientations. Mutants of five different genes (cistrons) on the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, having various abnormalities in visual function, have been tested by this method. All of these have been found to be autonomous, i.e., a mutant eye always functions abnormally, regardless of the amount of normal tissue present elsewhere, indicating that the primary causes of the behavioral deficits in these mutants are within the eye