RiffleScrambler - a memory-hard password storing function

We introduce RiffleScrambler: a new family of directed acyclic graphs and a corresponding data-independent memory hard function with password independent memory access. We prove its memory hardness in the random oracle model. RiffleScrambler is similar to Catena -- updates of hashes are determined by a graph (bit-reversal or double-butterfly graph in Catena). The advantage of the RiffleScrambler over Catena is that the underlying graphs are not predefined but are generated per salt, as in Balloon Hashing. Such an approach leads to higher immunity against practical parallel attacks. RiffleScrambler offers better efficiency than Balloon Hashing since the in-degree of the underlying graph is equal to 3 (and is much smaller than in Ballon Hashing). At the same time, because the underlying graph is an instance of a Superconcentrator, our construction achieves the same time-memory trade-offs.Comment: Accepted to ESORICS 201

Navigating in the Cayley graph of SL2(Fp)SL_2(F_p) and applications to hashing

Cayley hash functions are based on a simple idea of using a pair of (semi)group elements, $A$ and $B$, to hash the 0 and 1 bit, respectively, and then to hash an arbitrary bit string in the natural way, by using multiplication of elements in the (semi)group. In this paper, we focus on hashing with $2 \times 2$ matrices over $F_p$. Since there are many known pairs of $2 \times 2$ matrices over $Z$ that generate a free monoid, this yields numerous pairs of matrices over $F_p$, for a sufficiently large prime $p$, that are candidates for collision-resistant hashing. However, this trick can "backfire", and lifting matrix entries to $Z$ may facilitate finding a collision. This "lifting attack" was successfully used by Tillich and Z\'emor in the special case where two matrices $A$ and $B$ generate (as a monoid) the whole monoid $SL_2(Z_+)$. However, in this paper we show that the situation with other, "similar", pairs of matrices from $SL_2(Z)$ is different, and the "lifting attack" can (in some cases) produce collisions in the group generated by $A$ and $B$, but not in the positive monoid. Therefore, we argue that for these pairs of matrices, there are no known attacks at this time that would affect security of the corresponding hash functions. We also give explicit lower bounds on the length of collisions for hash functions corresponding to some particular pairs of matrices from $SL_2(F_p)$.Comment: 10 page