487 research outputs found
Hardness and approximation for the geodetic set problem in some graph classes
In this paper, we study the computational complexity of finding the
\emph{geodetic number} of graphs. A set of vertices of a graph is a
\emph{geodetic set} if any vertex of lies in some shortest path between
some pair of vertices from . The \textsc{Minimum Geodetic Set (MGS)} problem
is to find a geodetic set with minimum cardinality. In this paper, we prove
that solving the \textsc{MGS} problem is NP-hard on planar graphs with a
maximum degree six and line graphs. We also show that unless , there is
no polynomial time algorithm to solve the \textsc{MGS} problem with
sublogarithmic approximation factor (in terms of the number of vertices) even
on graphs with diameter . On the positive side, we give an
-approximation algorithm for the \textsc{MGS}
problem on general graphs of order . We also give a -approximation
algorithm for the \textsc{MGS} problem on the family of solid grid graphs which
is a subclass of planar graphs
Computing Minimum Rainbow and Strong Rainbow Colorings of Block Graphs
A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are
colored the same. The graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path
between every pair of vertices. If there is a rainbow shortest path between
every pair of vertices, the graph is strongly rainbow-connected. The
minimum number of colors needed to make rainbow-connected is known as the
rainbow connection number of , and is denoted by . Similarly,
the minimum number of colors needed to make strongly rainbow-connected is
known as the strong rainbow connection number of , and is denoted by
. We prove that for every , deciding whether
is NP-complete for split graphs, which form a subclass
of chordal graphs. Furthermore, there exists no polynomial-time algorithm for
approximating the strong rainbow connection number of an -vertex split graph
with a factor of for any unless P = NP. We
then turn our attention to block graphs, which also form a subclass of chordal
graphs. We determine the strong rainbow connection number of block graphs, and
show it can be computed in linear time. Finally, we provide a polynomial-time
characterization of bridgeless block graphs with rainbow connection number at
most 4.Comment: 13 pages, 3 figure
Parameterized Complexity of Geodetic Set
A vertex set S of a graph G is geodetic if every vertex of G lies on a shortest path between two vertices in S. Given a graph G and k ? ?, the NP-hard Geodetic Set problem asks whether there is a geodetic set of size at most k. Complementing various works on Geodetic Set restricted to special graph classes, we initiate a parameterized complexity study of Geodetic Set and show, on the negative side, that Geodetic Set is W[1]-hard when parameterized by feedback vertex number, path-width, and solution size, combined. On the positive side, we develop fixed-parameter algorithms with respect to the feedback edge number, the tree-depth, and the modular-width of the input graph
Complexity and Algorithms for ISOMETRIC PATH COVER on Chordal Graphs and Beyond
A path is isometric if it is a shortest path between its endpoints. In this article, we consider the graph covering problem Isometric Path Cover, where we want to cover all the vertices of the graph using a minimum-size set of isometric paths. Although this problem has been considered from a structural point of view (in particular, regarding applications to pursuit-evasion games), it is little studied from the algorithmic perspective. We consider Isometric Path Cover on chordal graphs, and show that the problem is NP-hard for this class. On the positive side, for chordal graphs, we design a 4-approximation algorithm and an FPT algorithm for the parameter solution size. The approximation algorithm is based on a reduction to the classic path covering problem on a suitable directed acyclic graph obtained from a breadth first search traversal of the graph. The approximation ratio of our algorithm is 3 for interval graphs and 2 for proper interval graphs. Moreover, we extend the analysis of our approximation algorithm to k-chordal graphs (graphs whose induced cycles have length at most k) by showing that it has an approximation ratio of k+7 for such graphs, and to graphs of treelength at most ?, where the approximation ratio is at most 6?+2
Algorithms and Complexity for Geodetic Sets on Planar and Chordal Graphs
We study the complexity of finding the geodetic number on subclasses of planar graphs and chordal graphs. A set S of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if every vertex of G lies in a shortest path between some pair of vertices of S. The Minimum Geodetic Set (MGS) problem is to find a geodetic set with minimum cardinality of a given graph. The problem is known to remain NP-hard on bipartite graphs, chordal graphs, planar graphs and subcubic graphs. We first study MGS on restricted classes of planar graphs: we design a linear-time algorithm for MGS on solid grids, improving on a 3-approximation algorithm by Chakraborty et al. (CALDAM, 2020) and show that MGS remains NP-hard even for subcubic partial grids of arbitrary girth. This unifies some results in the literature. We then turn our attention to chordal graphs, showing that MGS is fixed parameter tractable for inputs of this class when parameterized by their treewidth (which equals the clique number minus one). This implies a linear-time algorithm for k-trees, for fixed k. Then, we show that MGS is NP-hard on interval graphs, thereby answering a question of Ekim et al. (LATIN, 2012). As interval graphs are very constrained, to prove the latter result we design a rather sophisticated reduction technique to work around their inherent linear structure
Three problems on well-partitioned chordal graphs
In this work, we solve three problems on well-partitioned chordal graphs. First, we show that every connected (resp., 2-connected) well-partitioned chordal graph has a vertex that intersects all longest paths (resp., longest cycles). It is an open problem [Balister et al., Comb. Probab. Comput. 2004] whether the same holds for chordal graphs. Similarly, we show that every connected well-partitioned chordal graph admits a (polynomial-time constructible) tree 3-spanner, while the complexity status of the Tree 3-Spanner problem remains open on chordal graphs [BrandstÀdt et al., Theor. Comput. Sci. 2004]. Finally, we show that the problem of finding a minimum-size geodetic set is polynomial-time solvable on well-partitioned chordal graphs. This is the first example of a problem that is NP -hard on chordal graphs and polynomial-time solvable on well-partitioned chordal graphs. Altogether, these results reinforce the significance of this recently defined graph class as a tool to tackle problems that are hard or unsolved on chordal graphs.acceptedVersio
07211 Abstracts Collection -- Exact, Approximative, Robust and Certifying Algorithms on Particular Graph Classes
From May 20 to May 25, 2007, the Dagstuhl Seminar 07211 ``Exact, Approximative, Robust and Certifying Algorithms on Particular Graph Classes\u27\u27 was held
in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
Grundy Distinguishes Treewidth from Pathwidth
Structural graph parameters, such as treewidth, pathwidth, and clique-width,
are a central topic of study in parameterized complexity. A main aim of
research in this area is to understand the "price of generality" of these
widths: as we transition from more restrictive to more general notions, which
are the problems that see their complexity status deteriorate from
fixed-parameter tractable to intractable? This type of question is by now very
well-studied, but, somewhat strikingly, the algorithmic frontier between the
two (arguably) most central width notions, treewidth and pathwidth, is still
not understood: currently, no natural graph problem is known to be W-hard for
one but FPT for the other. Indeed, a surprising development of the last few
years has been the observation that for many of the most paradigmatic problems,
their complexities for the two parameters actually coincide exactly, despite
the fact that treewidth is a much more general parameter. It would thus appear
that the extra generality of treewidth over pathwidth often comes "for free".
Our main contribution in this paper is to uncover the first natural example
where this generality comes with a high price. We consider Grundy Coloring, a
variation of coloring where one seeks to calculate the worst possible coloring
that could be assigned to a graph by a greedy First-Fit algorithm. We show that
this well-studied problem is FPT parameterized by pathwidth; however, it
becomes significantly harder (W[1]-hard) when parameterized by treewidth.
Furthermore, we show that Grundy Coloring makes a second complexity jump for
more general widths, as it becomes para-NP-hard for clique-width. Hence, Grundy
Coloring nicely captures the complexity trade-offs between the three most
well-studied parameters. Completing the picture, we show that Grundy Coloring
is FPT parameterized by modular-width.Comment: To be published in proceedings of ESA 202
- âŠ