2,996 research outputs found
Building Ethically Bounded AI
The more AI agents are deployed in scenarios with possibly unexpected
situations, the more they need to be flexible, adaptive, and creative in
achieving the goal we have given them. Thus, a certain level of freedom to
choose the best path to the goal is inherent in making AI robust and flexible
enough. At the same time, however, the pervasive deployment of AI in our life,
whether AI is autonomous or collaborating with humans, raises several ethical
challenges. AI agents should be aware and follow appropriate ethical principles
and should thus exhibit properties such as fairness or other virtues. These
ethical principles should define the boundaries of AI's freedom and creativity.
However, it is still a challenge to understand how to specify and reason with
ethical boundaries in AI agents and how to combine them appropriately with
subjective preferences and goal specifications. Some initial attempts employ
either a data-driven example-based approach for both, or a symbolic rule-based
approach for both. We envision a modular approach where any AI technique can be
used for any of these essential ingredients in decision making or decision
support systems, paired with a contextual approach to define their combination
and relative weight. In a world where neither humans nor AI systems work in
isolation, but are tightly interconnected, e.g., the Internet of Things, we
also envision a compositional approach to building ethically bounded AI, where
the ethical properties of each component can be fruitfully exploited to derive
those of the overall system. In this paper we define and motivate the notion of
ethically-bounded AI, we describe two concrete examples, and we outline some
outstanding challenges.Comment: Published at AAAI Blue Sky Track, winner of Blue Sky Awar
Predicting human preferences using the block structure of complex social networks
With ever-increasing available data, predicting individuals' preferences and
helping them locate the most relevant information has become a pressing need.
Understanding and predicting preferences is also important from a fundamental
point of view, as part of what has been called a "new" computational social
science. Here, we propose a novel approach based on stochastic block models,
which have been developed by sociologists as plausible models of complex
networks of social interactions. Our model is in the spirit of predicting
individuals' preferences based on the preferences of others but, rather than
fitting a particular model, we rely on a Bayesian approach that samples over
the ensemble of all possible models. We show that our approach is considerably
more accurate than leading recommender algorithms, with major relative
improvements between 38% and 99% over industry-level algorithms. Besides, our
approach sheds light on decision-making processes by identifying groups of
individuals that have consistently similar preferences, and enabling the
analysis of the characteristics of those groups
R-UCB: a Contextual Bandit Algorithm for Risk-Aware Recommender Systems
Mobile Context-Aware Recommender Systems can be naturally modelled as an
exploration/exploitation trade-off (exr/exp) problem, where the system has to
choose between maximizing its expected rewards dealing with its current
knowledge (exploitation) and learning more about the unknown user's preferences
to improve its knowledge (exploration). This problem has been addressed by the
reinforcement learning community but they do not consider the risk level of the
current user's situation, where it may be dangerous to recommend items the user
may not desire in her current situation if the risk level is high. We introduce
in this paper an algorithm named R-UCB that considers the risk level of the
user's situation to adaptively balance between exr and exp. The detailed
analysis of the experimental results reveals several important discoveries in
the exr/exp behaviour
Improving argumentation-based recommender systems through context-adaptable selection criteria
Recommender Systems based on argumentation represent an important proposal where the recommendation is supported by qualitative information. In these systems, the role of the comparison criterion used to decide between competing arguments is paramount and the possibility of using the most appropriate for a given domain becomes a central issue; therefore, an argumentative recommender system that offers an interchangeable argument comparison criterion provides a significant ability that can be exploited by the user. However, in most of current recommender systems, the argument comparison criterion is either fixed, or codified within the arguments. In this work we propose a formalization of context-adaptable selection criteria that enhances the argumentative reasoning mechanism. Thus, we do not propose of a new type of recommender system; instead we present a mechanism that expand the capabilities of existing argumentation-based recommender systems. More precisely, our proposal is to provide a way of specifying how to select and use the most appropriate argument comparison criterion effecting the selection on the user´s preferences, giving the possibility of programming, by the use of conditional expressions, which argument preference criterion has to be used in each particular situation.Fil: Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - BahÃa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e IngenierÃa de la Computación; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre RÃos; ArgentinaFil: Gottifredi, Sebastián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - BahÃa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e IngenierÃa de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: GarcÃa, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - BahÃa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e IngenierÃa de la Computación; ArgentinaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientÃficas y Técnicas. Centro CientÃfico Tecnológico Conicet - BahÃa Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e IngenierÃa de la Computación; Argentin
- …